My Morning Commute
Our Community › Forums › Commuters › My Morning Commute
- This topic has 6,789 replies, 234 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 2 months ago by
Brendan von Buckingham.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 11, 2018 at 7:01 pm #1089618
ginacico
Participant@Steve O 180889 wrote:
I think it should be an ingrained habit to glance over your left shoulder any time you are going to move left, whether on trail, road or racing in a garage. A mirror can mitigate this need to a significant degree, however. Even if you are completely copacetic with your move, it’s good to know what’s back there.
This is so habitual for me that I find myself doing it even on my rides home in the middle of the night when I know for certain there is no one around for miles.Sigh. By implying that we don’t employ mirrors and similar habits, you’re beating a dead horse and missing the point entirely.
@ginacico 174981 wrote:
Me: Northbound MVT approaching turn onto the 14th St bridge. Looked behind and saw no one, slowed down gradually, gave a long full-arm left turn signal, and made a gradual wide turn leaving plenty of room for someone coming downhill in the opposite lane.
You: Appeared out of nowhere and screeched your brakes behind me, as though I’d done something unpredictable and interrupted your morning hammerfest.
Dude, that was audacious and amateur. Just because you’re fast doesn’t mean you’re not an idiot.
The point is, defensive behavior won’t keep you from a wreck or near miss when people behave like asshats.
LOTM and I are bitching about idiots who don’t follow conventional rules of the road. I’ve concluded there is no productive advice on how to avoid or stop them, which is why this thread sounds like a broken record. A broken record. A broken record.
September 11, 2018 at 8:03 pm #1089619Tania
Participantginacico;180923 wrote:sigh. By implying that we don’t employ mirrors and similar habits, you’re beating a dead horse and missing the point entirely.The point is, defensive behavior won’t keep you from a wreck or near miss when people behave like asshats.
Lotm and i are bitching about idiots who don’t follow conventional rules of the road. I’ve concluded there is no productive advice on how to avoid or stop them, which is why this thread sounds like a broken record. A broken record. A broken record.
elite. Elite. Elite. Elite. Elite. Elite.
September 11, 2018 at 8:46 pm #1089620musclys
Participant@Subby 180758 wrote:
I’m worried that the dude driving the opposite direction from me on Georgetown Pike this morning at 6:20am was not able to properly hear my witty rejoinder to his “get off the road” admonition. So just in case you stumble upon this board searching for answers, what I replied was…”fuck you”.
Boom. Roasted. Here is some Neosporin for that burn, etc..
#fightme
Curious. When we ride together, you always leave the fighting words to me.
September 11, 2018 at 8:49 pm #1089621PeteD
Participant@ginacico 180923 wrote:
The point is, defensive behavior won’t keep you from a wreck or near miss when people behave like asshats.
LOTM and I are bitching about idiots who don’t follow conventional rules of the road. I’ve concluded there is no productive advice on how to avoid or stop them, which is why this thread sounds like a broken record. A broken record. A broken record.
Yup. Just this morning I was almost run over by the same driver twice. Even with my defensive behaviour, I barely escaped injury due to my evasive manoevers the second time. I failed to channel my inner Dirt, and I believe the surprisingly explative-free phrase I yelled was “What?!?!?! Did you NOT see my hand signal?”
[ATTACH=CONFIG]18357[/ATTACH]
September 12, 2018 at 2:23 pm #1089632lordofthemark
Participant@ginacico 180923 wrote:
LOTM and I are bitching about idiots who don’t follow conventional rules of the road. I’ve concluded there is no productive advice on how to avoid or stop them, which is why this thread sounds like a broken record. A broken record. A broken record.
Kind of. After an RH sermon on civility (more or less) I am trying not to come off as bitchy, but as learning. There are as many people have noted above, things we do for our own safety that are in fact accommodations to unsafe behavior by others. Defensive biking, I guess. But I doubt any of us are perfectly defensive riders at all times – at some point looking out for the rule violators is exhausting. Not that I would ever discourage a practice that makes one safer. As I said, I will turn around to look more on trails and consider getting a helmet mirror (I had a handlebar end mirror a couple of bikes ago, but I hated it). But I do think the principle burden should be on the rider passing to call their passes, which is in fact the trail etiquette that I believe all trail owning orgs support, and which we now have nice new signs on most trails in NoVa to remind us of.
September 12, 2018 at 3:39 pm #1089634hozn
Participant@ginacico 180923 wrote:
Sigh. By implying that we don’t employ mirrors and similar habits, you’re beating a dead horse and missing the point entirely.
The point is, defensive behavior won’t keep you from a wreck or near miss when people behave like asshats.
LOTM and I are bitching about idiots who don’t follow conventional rules of the road. I’ve concluded there is no productive advice on how to avoid or stop them, which is why this thread sounds like a broken record. A broken record. A broken record.
I don’t think Steve was implying that. LOTM was the one who says he doesn’t look behind him (and I understand believes that this shouldn’t be required if you signal). I’d agree with Steve on this one, that checking before you change lanes is just safe practice. I’m sure that 90% of the folks here are doing this. But, yeah, that horse is dead and I feel bad about the way it died. I’ll stop beating it.
Completely agree that you can’t stop people from being asshats. Ideally there’d be consequences for people behaving like that on the trail besides just the ire of their fellow MUP users. Sadly relying on peoples’ better nature and common consideration is a sort of 80/20 rule around here. I’m sure for some of you it feels less positive than that. I will say that every time I ride the MVT in traffic, I am amazed at the difference in behavior. On the W&OD most people cover lights, etc. On the MVT basically no one does. And obviously the trail is narrow and busier and people are speeding around peds or shooting the way-too-narrow-on-that-trail gap. It’s ridiculous. And not even all of them are e-bike riders!
The non-e-bike riders must be from Maryland.
September 12, 2018 at 4:49 pm #1089640huskerdont
ParticipantIs like with cars. You shouldn’t have to check to make sure drivers are actually stopping when their light changes red, but you do; otherwise, you get dead if you go.
September 12, 2018 at 5:18 pm #1089641lordofthemark
Participant@hozn 180941 wrote:
I don’t think Steve was implying that. LOTM was the one who says he doesn’t look behind him (and I understand believes that this shouldn’t be required if you signal). I’d agree with Steve on this one, that checking before you change lanes is just safe practice. I’m sure that 90% of the folks here are doing this. But, yeah, that horse is dead and I feel bad about the way it died. I’ll stop beating it.
Completely agree that you can’t stop people from being asshats. Ideally there’d be consequences for people behaving like that on the trail besides just the ire of their fellow MUP users. Sadly relying on peoples’ better nature and common consideration is a sort of 80/20 rule around here. I’m sure for some of you it feels less positive than that. I will say that every time I ride the MVT in traffic, I am amazed at the difference in behavior. On the W&OD most people cover lights, etc. On the MVT basically no one does. And obviously the trail is narrow and busier and people are speeding around peds or shooting the way-too-narrow-on-that-trail gap. It’s ridiculous. And not even all of them are e-bike riders!
The non-e-bike riders must be from Maryland.
Ah, I shouldn’t beat dead horses either, but do want to clarify my position a bit.
1. I always look when changing lanes on roads.
2. Even before this discussion, I sometimes looked when changing lanes on trails.
3. I have often not done so. If I am the only person here who has not completely consistently biked defensively (IE not merely being a PAL, but going beyond to check for violations by others) I do need to self reflect more.
4. Yes, I do think that one should not HAVE to look behind on a trail when passing appropriately and signalling. Note, we are talking about passing into an opposite direction lane, where only another passer should be approaching from behind, its not the equivalent of passing into another lane going the same direction (as on a multilane road). And I note that all the trail etiquette rules I have seen do say to call your passes, and none say to anyone that they are required to look behind when passing. As a matter of policy, of what trail etiquette we promote, I do NOT think we should be promoting an obligation to look behind when passing. Just as we should not be promoting an obligation for people proceeding through an intersection with a green light to look for red light violators. Or promoting an obligation for pedestrians walking with the light, in crosswalks, to not look at their phones in order to check for scofflaw drivers.
5. That does not mean defensive biking/walking/driving is not a good idea for self preservation. I certainly do not look at my phone when walking across the street. I am, I think more cautious at street intersections than most riders I see. I will be more careful when passing on the trails, to avoid being hit by someone passing me without calling.
6. But yeah, those folks (who pass without calling) are a source of danger and discomfort to other trail users. They are not following widespread rules of trail etiquette (at least in the USA).
7. My main solution to this, for me personally, is simply to avoid the MVT at the most crowded times, when it is filled both with users I need to pass (walkers, runners, and very slow riders) and the pathletes who will pass me without calling. Thankfully I have an alternative I like the Eads Street bike lanes. People can complain about the imperfections of those lanes all they want, but given how I ride (not terribly fast, and quite careful at intersections) I find them much more comfortable than the MVT most of the time – I tend to take them at PM rush hour even though they lengthen my commute home.
September 12, 2018 at 5:59 pm #1089642Crickey7
ParticipantI dunno. I generally check, but I can’t say I swivel around that much, maybe to about 8 o’clock position. And some riders come up super fast. E bike riders aren’t noticeably worse as a percentage, but they are faster and they’re starting to become more numerous on the CCT.
September 13, 2018 at 12:29 pm #1089663huskerdont
Participant@lordofthemark 180948 wrote:
7. My main solution to this, for me personally, is simply to avoid the MVT at the most crowded times…
So many of us do this that it’s a wonder anyone uses it at the most crowded times.
The MVT really is substandard at this point, with the exception of the sections that have recently been redone.
September 13, 2018 at 1:29 pm #1089665lordofthemark
Participant@huskerdont 180963 wrote:
So many of us do this that it’s a wonder anyone uses it at the most crowded times.
The MVT really is substandard at this point, with the exception of the the sections that have recently been redone.
Between newbies/casuals afraid to ride near cars, and pathletes who ride faster than would be safe in a PBL (and who wants to stop at a red when you are training, I guess?) there are a lot of people for whom that is not a good option I think.
September 13, 2018 at 1:53 pm #1089666honestmachinery
Participant@huskerdont 180963 wrote:
So many of us do this that it’s a wonder anyone uses it at the most crowded times.
The MVT really is substandard at this point, with the exception of the the sections that have recently been redone.
I can’t remember the last time new pavement was applied, unless it related to other infrastructure projects. I guess I should just still be happy the trail was striped in 1990, and frames fit wider tires again.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
September 13, 2018 at 3:30 pm #1089669huskerdont
Participant@honestmachinery 180966 wrote:
I can’t remember the last time new pavement was applied, unless it related to other infrastructure projects. I guess I should just still be happy the trail was striped in 1990, and frames fit wider tires again.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
People were posting about the root heaves on the Custis near the bridge to nowhere, but those hardly rate compared to the root heaves on the MVT near Memorial Bridge. I actually almost went over the handlebars last weekend because of a combination of one set and forgetting I was on a fixie.
And how much narrower is the trail now compared to when it was first paved what with the encroachment of grass and debris? I am truly thankful I usually commute via the Custis, which does get attention from Arlington county, rather than the MVT. If a tree comes down along the trail in Arlington and you write in, they take care of it that day. Trollheim injures people regularly, yet nothing is done. It’s too bad people generally can’t successfully sue because of substandard infrastructure that causes injury. But I suppose a successful suit, instead of prompting remediation, would likely end up with a closing of the trail.
September 13, 2018 at 5:12 pm #1089670dasgeh
Participant@huskerdont 180969 wrote:
And how much narrower is the trail now compared to when it was first paved what with the encroachment of grass and debris? I am truly thankful I usually commute via the Custis, which does get attention from Arlington county, rather than the MVT. If a tree comes down along the trail in Arlington and you write in, they take care of it that day. Trollheim injures people regularly, yet nothing is done. It’s too bad people generally can’t successfully sue because of substandard infrastructure that causes injury. But I suppose a successful suit, instead of prompting remediation, would likely end up with a closing of the trail.
Please tell the people who can do something about it: your elected federal officials.
September 13, 2018 at 5:26 pm #1089673mstone
Participant@dasgeh 180972 wrote:
Please tell the people who can do something about it: your elected federal officials.
NPS has a maintenance backlog of more than ten billion dollars, and congress could not care less since it isn’t a social wedge issue that will motivate primary voters. But sure, maybe a phone call about a trail in DC will change everything.
If someone’s real motivated to work the phones, there’s much higher chance of making progress by getting a local company to sponsor the trail. I hear they might even get naming rights.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.