dkel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 2,399 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Covid-19 Sanatarium: Group Bike Rides #1105313
    dkel
    Participant

    @accordioneur 199363 wrote:

    Holy cow! Recreational cycling prohibited in Spain, too (commuting and #adulting still allowed). I think CBGAnimal may want to rethink some plans. 😮

    It’s true that a bike crash may necessitate calling for medical assistance, which would unnecessarily burden an already strained medical system. Fortunately most of us can still drive: as we all know, cars never crash!

    So much for logic.

    in reply to: Road brake lever angle? #1104977
    dkel
    Participant

    You could ditch the road levers altogether, and go with cross levers.

    in reply to: Why Finland leads the field when it comes to winter cycling #1104302
    dkel
    Participant

    Because in Finland it’s winter year round?

    in reply to: Rules Clarification Question #1101519
    dkel
    Participant

    @epilsk 194737 wrote:

    I think a prize based on evaluating people’s smugness can only end badly. But it would be a lot of wicked fun, however!

    Sounds like an everybody-wins proposition.

    in reply to: Missed connection #1100798
    dkel
    Participant

    @Drewdane 193673 wrote:

    Not to defend people who don’t use their own lights and reflectors, but would it kill you to briefly cover your light or swivel it to the side? A light angled to illuminate 25-30 feet ahead is also angled high enough to temporarily blind most oncoming trail users.

    I don’t cover my light for people who don’t use one because then no one can see. I cover mainly the upper portion of my light when others are also using lights because my light’s beam is quite diffuse; if I had a nice dynamo light with a swanky cutoff, all of this would be obviated. I get frustrated when I cover mine and an oncoming cyclist blinds me with theirs—that seems offensively dangerous to me. I have no problem with lights that aren’t blinding.

    in reply to: Should Cyclists Be Allowed to Yield at Stop Signs? #1099586
    dkel
    Participant

    I hardly ever see drivers come to a complete stop. I also will get passed by drivers at stop signs: these drivers seem to think that when a bike slows down at a stop sign, that’s the perfect time to roll through—on the wrong side of the road. In other words, what difference does it make whether cyclists stop or not? The whole thing is already pretty close to a free-for-all, and the only thing that matters to anyone, it seems, is getting ahead.

    in reply to: some fun and inventive cartoons #1099533
    dkel
    Participant

    “Utterly useless cycle lanes: a painted white line with no segregation from traffic = worse than no line.” My thought exactly as I was riding up Gallows Rd today. The only caveat to this is that if there is no white line, some drivers may assume this means you shouldn’t be there at all, and will no doubt make that abundantly clear in diverse ways as they zoom by.

    in reply to: Missed connection #1099522
    dkel
    Participant

    My stopping at the stop sign on my bike is not your big opportunity to pass me by whizzing right through the stop in your car, on the wrong side of the road!

    dkel
    Participant

    @Starduster 191805 wrote:

    Before we get too distracted, this is about single use bottles, etc, that are now a huge pollution hazard, not your structural plastics…

    Hey, man, I’m just trying to push back on the haters.

    dkel
    Participant

    @DismalScientist 191786 wrote:

    I assume that carbon bikes are not allowed to participate.

    Do any of your retro-grouch bikes actually have zero plastic on them? My son’s recently acquired 80s Trek road bike seems to have at least a few plastic bits on it.

    dkel
    Participant

    @Drewdane 191759 wrote:

    It’s actually a very well-made video by The Guardian, discussing cyclist behavior in traffic, some of the reasons why we do the things we do, and whether it’s really as bad as non-cyclists are always complaining about.

    I was reluctant to watch it because I thought it would cause me to feel even more antagonized than I already am by drivers on a nearly daily basis of late. Having watched it, I wish all those same drivers would watch it, because it’s exactly the kind of thing that might get them to stop antagonizing me just for being “a cyclist.”

    in reply to: Missed connection #1099265
    dkel
    Participant

    @rcannon100 191481 wrote:

    “Might appear” to whom?? Bitching to each other does nothing. That is exactly my point. You want change – STOP KVETCHIHNG and when you have a problem with someone, stop them, talk to them. Waiting till you can post a whitty remark on the forum is just an ego game.

    Point taken.

    Man, you’re annoying!

    in reply to: Weekly Coffee Gatherings #1099168
    dkel
    Participant

    @rcannon100 191375 wrote:

    Just as long as its not Subby, I’m fine with it.

    Ok. I just don’t want anyone misinterpreting the type of gathering it is—private, as opposed to public.

    in reply to: Weekly Coffee Gatherings #1099163
    dkel
    Participant

    @dcv 191366 wrote:

    .8cca112e001e97538ad3fb210c604637.jpg

    Did rcannon100 give you permission to post that pic, cuz…

    dkel
    Participant

    The “Cycling Route Afterthought Project” Trail.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 2,399 total)