e-Bikes – Let’s talk
Our Community › Forums › Commuters › e-Bikes – Let’s talk
- This topic has 1,364 replies, 117 voices, and was last updated 6 months ago by
Max Silverstone.
-
CreatorTopic
-
June 21, 2011 at 7:12 pm #910062
eBikeDude
ParticipantI see a number of pros and cons to e-bikes, and I’d like to get a conversation going on that topic. Any other e-Bike users out there? What do you like about it? Anyone with concerns about e-Bikes? Let’s hear from you too! Please be nice, though!
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 27, 2017 at 6:39 pm #1076176
TwoWheelsDC
ParticipantPretty soon the Falls Church PD will be on here with a burner account advocating for speed limits on the W&OD. $$$$$
September 27, 2017 at 6:43 pm #1076179Harry Meatmotor
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 165840 wrote:
Virginia allows up to 1000W motors to be classified as “electric power-assisted bicycles,” which are effectively treated the same as bikes.
This is the problem.
September 27, 2017 at 7:18 pm #1076183Judd
Participant@lordofthemark 165871 wrote:
(would they need to ride ebikes to make sure they could keep up with violators?)
I prefer to be called a perp.
September 27, 2017 at 7:48 pm #1076185Vicegrip
Participant@Harry Meatmotor 165878 wrote:
This is the problem.
Ya, 1000 watts is well over 1 HP. Meat motors are for the most part good for 200 watts or so unless gifted or prodded.
I took a long look a some electric MTN bikes at a local bike shop. I am now in the “Oh, Hell no” category now. Too many people spent too much time getting other people to change their minds and let MTN bikes into the woods and then going into the woods and hand building trails.
September 27, 2017 at 8:38 pm #1076186Judd
Participant@Vicegrip 165884 wrote:
Ya, 1000 watts is well over 1 HP.
I’m failing to see something wrong with a Multi Use Trail user being able to put out nearly the same wattage as a finishing sprinter at the Tour de France.
September 27, 2017 at 8:44 pm #1076187Subby
ParticipantI had fun racing an e-bike dude down the Rosslyn hill today until he jumped up on the sidewalk along Lynn before the IOD.
Cheater.
September 27, 2017 at 8:50 pm #1076188anomad
ParticipantI wonder how many times I could get away with riding my Suzuki to work on the bike path? It would be an interesting experiment.
September 27, 2017 at 9:02 pm #1076189Crickey7
Participant@lordofthemark 165871 wrote:
How would you enforce it?
Once a year or so on the CCT, the MoCo Park Police set up a radar trap on the trail. They tag you going above 15, they wave you over and ticket you. I suspect they have a motorcycle with them, but for all their scofflaw reputation cyclists will obey an officer’s command.
September 28, 2017 at 12:21 am #1076194sjclaeys
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 165827 wrote:
Most e-bikes a)don’t weigh dramatically more than normal bikes; b)aren’t traveling dramatically faster than normal bikes, and; c)can’t go up a hill at a “constant speed.”
I’d love to see objective data about this.
September 28, 2017 at 12:24 am #1076195sjclaeys
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 165827 wrote:
An e-bike will get you up a hill with less effort than a regular bike, but not dramatically faster and not at a constant speed as you say.
So the times when I’ve been passed going up the Custis Trail from Rosslyn by an e-bike going considerably faster was my imagination? Note, that this is one of the larger e-bikes (and they don’t call their passes).
September 28, 2017 at 12:25 am #1076196sjclaeys
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 165827 wrote:
Why are we focused on making sure e-bike riders take all this extra care when e-bikes are almost-without-exception within the existing range of rider mass and speeds already on the trail?
I guess we can look at this question from the other perspective of why are e-bike divers so focused on not taking extra care?
September 28, 2017 at 11:38 am #1076203mstone
Participant@EasyRider 165851 wrote:
One might say the same of road speed limits for automobiles, but it’s not a great argument for doing away with them.
The difference is fairly clear science that higher vehicle speed limits result in more fatalities. I don’t think there’s any science to suggest that a speed limit of 15 (i.e., 25) on a trail does anything to affect fatality rates–the speeds involved are all so low (the difference between typical minimum and maximum speeds is within the legal margin of error) that the limit is utterly pointless. If the intended purpose of the limit is to make people “feel better” I’d submit that an a-hole going 15 through a fun run on a crowded Saturday morning, though within the legal limit, isn’t making anyone else feel anything but rage.
September 28, 2017 at 11:45 am #1076204mstone
Participant@Vicegrip 165884 wrote:
Ya, 1000 watts is well over 1 HP. Meat motors are for the most part good for 200 watts or so unless gifted or prodded.
I took a long look a some electric MTN bikes at a local bike shop. I am now in the “Oh, Hell no” category now. Too many people spent too much time getting other people to change their minds and let MTN bikes into the woods and then going into the woods and hand building trails.
This has basically been my problem with e-bikes all along. The advocates insist that it’s only assistive, and the speeds aren’t that high, and the batteries won’t allow extended high speed use–but this is just tech, and tech improves. I’m not particularly troubled with current e-bikes, but it’s a dead certainty that within a few years it’ll be easy to get a little electric motorcycle that can easily do 20-30MPH for a typical commute–and that’s something that the current infrastructure is entirely unable to support. It’s also dead certain that LE is entirely unable to enforce any fine distinctions between types of ebikes (wattage, max speed, etc) in any systematic fashion. So, while I wish there were a better solution that makes it easier for people to use assistive ebikes, I don’t see a more practicable solution than to just ban everything with a motor and hope that people riding responsibly can fly under the radar/rely on enforcement discretion. (But realistically, I know that as the 30MPH emotorcycles become common, the idiotic reactive enforcement is going to sweep up the responsible, slow, easy to catch riders rather than the asshats. I really don’t know what a good solution is.)
September 28, 2017 at 11:51 am #1076205mstone
Participant@huskerdont 165872 wrote:
Personally, if I had to remain under 15 mph no matter what the trail/traffic conditions, I’d ride on the roads instead.
For longer commutes in Fairfax I think you’d just see a decline in riders. There are long stretches of the W&OD which are mostly empty in the morning where 20MPH is in no way unsafe (unless you’re not watching for deer) and where there aren’t any safe on-road alternatives.
September 28, 2017 at 1:07 pm #1076208anomad
Participant@mstone 165904 wrote:
, but it’s a dead certainty that within a few years it’ll be easy to get a little electric motorcycle that can easily do 20-30MPH for a typical commute
30 mph ebikes with long range have been around for years now.
We shouldn’t forget that speed and fun have a linear relationship.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.