Raymo853
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Raymo853
Participant@hozn 146104 wrote:
I am also curious about problems with larger than a 32t rear; I haven’t had any problems with a 36t rear cog, but that is the largest I have used. (Planning on 40/42, so should probably rethink if there are some significant drawbacks.)
I’ll stop at five but bet I can think of more:
• If you are in a rural location and break the rear derailleur, there are many more replacements available that can handle the biggest cog if it is 32 or less. And even more if it is 27 or less.
• If you cross chain your drivetrain into the big-big, a bigger big rear cog increases the chance for damage.
• Big rear cogs require longer chains. Not so concerned about weight but if the chain stays are touring bike long, normal replacement chains may not be long enough.
• The longer chain required by a big rear cog makes it harder to use small-smaller gear combos as the derailleur may not be able to take up the slake.
• The big cog cassettes are less common and often crazy expensiveBTW, I am a big advocate to have your bike set up so big-big combos do not damage anything. I know the list of reasons you should never shift into that combo, but it happens.
Raymo853
ParticipantI think the Herse crankset is one of the best looking crank sets I have I ever seen. If I had much more money time and space, I would have a retro touring bike with one on it. I would never use this bike for much more than riding around town.
However, if I needed to rely on my bike for real uses such as riding, commuting, or touring I would not consider it for even one second. Yes it is well engineered and will work well, but the lack of compatibility with standard chainrings is just foolish. Even if money is no concern, trying to find chainrings if you are far from home could be very difficult.
For touring, I suggest getting a 5 bolt crankset with the outer bolt diameter being 110 and the inner 74. You can find chain rings for those everywhere and in many many sizes. I have seen as small as 24 and as large as 54. Then ruin a wide by not crazy wide rear cassette. One with the smallest being 11 or 12 and the largest 30 or 32. Having the largest as 34-42 may sound good, but that can lead to a huge amount of other problems.
The best touring crank I know of, the Sugino XD500-T http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/cranks/11074.html One problem, it does not work well with 10 or 11 speed rear systems. In those cases, I would suggest something like a modern Shimano MTB triple crank.
Raymo853
ParticipantThere is this, but I submitted one for the murder on Burns SE.http://ghostbikes.org/ghostbikemap
No reply after a few days.
September 17, 2016 at 9:14 am in reply to: Anacostia River trail to Kenilworth Trail Bridge #1057265Raymo853
ParticipantHowever, there were still barriers up pass the garbage incinerator plant. This photo is from under Benning Road.
September 17, 2016 at 9:11 am in reply to: Anacostia River trail to Kenilworth Trail Bridge #1057264Raymo853
ParticipantWow, the completed all the pavement Friday.
September 16, 2016 at 1:33 pm in reply to: Ghost Bike for Cyclist Killed at Minnesota and Burns SE #1057208Raymo853
ParticipantBetter view of the current state of the memorial.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12432[/ATTACH]
September 16, 2016 at 1:16 pm in reply to: Ghost Bike for Cyclist Killed at Minnesota and Burns SE #1057205Raymo853
ParticipantAnd DC has target the memorial for removal. Just like they did for Alice Swanson’s on R Street and I am assume like others I do not know of.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]12431[/ATTACH]
Raymo853
ParticipantNot always about bikes, but after any day when I ride 10 plus hours, my dreams that night are crazy. But the bike focus are usually centered around my father’s stories’ about bike as a kid.
September 13, 2016 at 6:19 pm in reply to: Sunday Trail Work at Fort Dupont with REI and NPS #1057089Raymo853
Participant@DrP 145832 wrote:
So, I went to the page to figure out where Ft Dupont was. As per that web page, it is in Kansas. A little further than I would like to bike to this Sunday. Google does find one in DC. That might be easier.
I just saw that myself. I will send a note to the MORE folks right now.
August 28, 2016 at 9:42 am in reply to: Ghost Bike for Cyclist Killed at Minnesota and Burns SE #1058133Raymo853
ParticipantI noticed someone tried to remove the front wheel as well.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Raymo853
Participant@bentbike33 144826 wrote:
I wonder if a studded rear tire would help?
based on how studs reduce traction on stone and pavement, I assume it would make it worse
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Raymo853
Participant@vvill 144753 wrote:
So – why 12mm?
The main reason provided by those pushing the standard is lighter. I think the secondary ones are:
– without the lever of a 15 or Qr, it can be marketed as more aero
– it is not the MTB standard
– the wheel makers of the world needed to increase sales to fund their chem-trails researchhttp://www.cxmagazine.com/enve-cross-fork-12mm-axle-test-review
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Raymo853
ParticipantI like your idea, but you should ask on a Seattle focused forum and not a Washington DC forum nearly 3000 km away.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Raymo853
ParticipantLate notice, but both gone to Joel G
Raymo853
Participantgone, to Joel G.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
-
AuthorPosts