Self driving cars

[bobco85]

@Judd 163288 wrote:

(12:05 PM)I’ve also thought of how such a device could be used maliciously such as throwing a beacon in front of a moving vehicle.

@Judd 163290 wrote:

(12:21 PM)I’ve also thought of how such a device could be used maliciously such as throwing a beacon in front of a moving vehicle.

You guys should meet up sometime; very similar ways of thinking.

[trailrunner]

I worked for a while developing sensors for autonomous vehicles, and sensors for alerting the operator of an impending dangerous situation, such as a pedestrian or deer crossing in front of the vehicle. It is a very hard problem, even if I would have been allowed to cheat by providing some sort of recognition tag for classes of objects (such as pedestrians or cyclists). Based on what I know, autonomous vehicles scare me, and they have a long way to go before they are mature.

[Dewey]

Arlnow featured a video of an autonomous driverless van going up and down Wilson & Clarendon Boulevards in Arlington. At 30 seconds in you can see it passing a cyclist.

[Dewey]

GGW article “Congress and auto industry move to ban cities from regulating self-driving cars”

[mstone]

@scoot 163279 wrote:

Yes, our current mix of drivers has set an incredibly low bar for self-driving cars to clear. But I’d implicate our milquetoast licensing and traffic violence justice system rather than the cars themselves.

How many of these deaths could be prevented if we held drivers fully responsible for their actions? Is a self-driving car safer than an attentive sober driver who is genuinely more concerned about safety than being two minutes late?

Honestly, none of that matters: we live in this reality, where 200+ million americans think they have a god-given right to drive as fast as they want without paying attention to what’s in front of them, not an alternate reality in which we have 200+ million attentive sober drivers concerned about others. Self driving cars are the only foreseeable path toward streets which are safe for cyclists & pedestrians, because you can’t fix 200 million peoples’ ingrained bad habits. (And no, those people aren’t going to sign up for being held responsible for they way they drive.)

[Anna Riggins]

@nxzx 163260 wrote:

Self driving cars is the nice dream !!!

Which easy comes true. Guess in near future

[Dewey]

Mobility Lab article by an Arlington resident about “Why it’s so difficult for autonomous vehicles to see bikes“. The linked IEEE Spectrum blog post illustrates how far software still has to go before it can be trusted – only identifying which direction a bicycle is facing 59% of the time.

[cvcalhoun]

@Dewey 163731 wrote:

Arlnow featured a video of an autonomous driverless van going up and down Wilson & Clarendon Boulevards in Arlington. At 30 seconds in you can see it passing a cyclist.

Yeah, but it was a fake. There was just a carefully concealed driver.

[Dewey]

Thankfully not driving as recklessly as that James Bond fella driving a BMW with his phone from the back seat.

[Dewey]

@cvcalhoun 164789 wrote:

There was just a carefully concealed driver.

Thankfully not driving as recklessly as that James Bond fella driving a BMW with his phone from the back seat, the show off.

[Judd]

@cvcalhoun 164789 wrote:

Yeah, but it was a fake. There was just a carefully concealed driver.

Here’s Adam Tuss figuring it out…

https://twitter.com/AdamTuss/status/894627339891609602

[baiskeli]

@cvcalhoun 164789 wrote:

Yeah, but it was a fake. There was just a carefully concealed driver.

So the news is that a driver didn’t run over a cyclist. Back to square one.

[cvcalhoun]

@baiskeli 164818 wrote:

So the news is that a driver didn’t run over a cyclist. Back to square one.

Well, there are days I feel like that could be a legitimate news item. But perhaps I’m just jaded from playing dodge ’em in downtown DC.

[kellyon]

never heard about it before. Thanks for sharing was interesting to read

[Author]

Posts