Seeing non-CaBi dockless bikes using CaBi docks (seen at Roosevelt Island), Thoughts

Our Community Forums Capital Bikeshare Seeing non-CaBi dockless bikes using CaBi docks (seen at Roosevelt Island), Thoughts

  • This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by Yule.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1114183
    Zack
    Participant

    Hi Yule, I help manage bikeshare and scootershare for the County so thank you for sharing this photo. NPS does not allow dockless e-bike and e-scootershare parking on their property but I will check to see why these bikes fell through the cracks.

    We are replacing Roosevelt Island’s equipment with a slightly larger station (17 docks) sometime in the next few months.

    #1114185
    DrP
    Participant

    @Zack 210527 wrote:

    NPS does not allow dockless e-bike and e-scootershare parking on their property but I will check to see why these bikes fell through the cracks.

    Really? Given the numbers of dockless bikes and scooters scattered all around (and often on) the MVT and East and West Potomac Parks (and elsewhere on NPS land), I wonder what they do to stop it.

    #1114191
    LhasaCM
    Participant

    @DrP 210529 wrote:

    Really? Given the numbers of dockless bikes and scooters scattered all around (and often on) the MVT and East and West Potomac Parks (and elsewhere on NPS land), I wonder what they do to stop it.

    Related but unrelated: NPS launched a dockless scooter parking pilot program with DDOT to provide designated parking areas on/around the Mall. https://www.nps.gov/nama/planyourvisit/dockless-scooter-parking.htm

    #1114192
    Yule
    Participant

    @Zack 210527 wrote:

    NPS does not allow dockless e-bike and e-scootershare parking on their property but I will check to see why these bikes fell through the cracks.[/quote]
    I think that whenever I’ve cruised past the Roosevelt Island CaBi station, which is not often, there have been non-CaBi dockless ebikes and e-scooters there at the station (and usually nowhere else).

    I can also say that non-CaBi bikes/scooters outnumber the CaBi bikes around the station most times I’ve gone by. Especially on good-weather weekend/holiday-type days when people going to Roosevelt Island predictably create high demand for such things. It must be that people think the station is a proper place to drop off. I don’t think I’ve ever NOT seen some nonCaBi bikes or scooters there.

    There have been a few cases I remember of an empty Roosevelt Island Station with multiple JUMP (etc.) bikes and e-scooters around the station, so if anyone wanted to take a “small personal vehicle share” (bike or scooter), they’d be paying into the other guys and not CaBi, despite CaBi’s heavy infrastructure investment of the station.

    #1114193
    Yule
    Participant
    Quote:
    We are replacing Roosevelt Island’s equipment with a slightly larger station (17 docks) sometime in the next few months.
    That is good to hear.

    I am positive that CaBi planners have thought of all this, but I just wanted to put some thoughts to digital paper here:

    It would seem to me that demand on the stations at Roosevelt Island and Gravelly Point (and a potential Arlington Cemetery Station) are unique in the system in Arlington because they are: (1) more inelastic in demand (meaning people there will tend to either use those stations to get a bike or give up on the idea if none are available, NOT shift their ‘demand’ to another station), (2) seasonal (dependent on weather/day-of-week, creating relative demand surges more in relative terms than, I’d think, a typical station’s), and (3) higher-profit-to-the-system (higher share of non-member users) than, say, any of the stations in the Rosslyn area or really most other areas.

    If a station is full or empty at Rosslyn, there are other stations practically within eyesight which you can go to to dock or get a bike. Not so for Roosevelt Island and Gravelley Point users. The actual walked distance to the next station is one reason, but I think it’s going to be an even bigger psychological barrier. Few of the potential people taking bikes at Roosevelt Island are regular bike/bikeshare users, often not familiar with the area, and unwilling to just wander into an unknown area in search of a bike.

    I remember the Bike Angel point system. It is ruled by algorithm and didn’t seem to understand Roosevelt Island. When Roosevelt would go full or empty, it thought no big deal. The algorithm’s programmed thinking being: “Oh, look, the crow-flies distance to this ither station at Lynn St & 19th St North, nearest Key Bridge, is so close; demand to dock or take a bike from Roosevelt Island will shift there; so I’m marking this low-priority. We won’t pay many Bike Angel points, no big deal.”). Because of the unique kind of (inelastic) demand and the deceptive proximity (it only seems close if you are running on an algorithm — there is nothing like a straight line from Roosevelt Island to Rosslyn as if it was all a street grid), this was wrong.

    That problem ends up hurting the system as follows:

    I remember several cases in late 2018 (when the station was very new) and 2019. This excess of demand over supply would happen often. I remember seeing tourists on CaBi bikes staring at the full station, puzzled at what to do. An obvious case of demand-exceeding-supply. Meanwhile the Bike Angel system thought it was worth one point. These people, unable to dock, inevitably would get frustrated, not know what to do, try to contact the help-line; some might abandon the bikes, without docking near the station; many would end up with a sour taste in their mouths after arguing with someone about overcharges or whatever. Those situations are bad for all (if you read CaBi app reviews on google play store you see people smetimes giving one-star for problems like this) and often come down to demand exceeding supply at especially these tourist-oriented stations.

    (It feels like I’ve noticed Roosevelt Island gets more demand stress than Gravelley Point in the times I’ve either passed or noticed the situation on the app map. I can’t understand why that would be: Gravelly Point is even more isolated [the only game in town], attracts even more visitors with its much bigger parking lot than Roosevelt Island, and has its station location in an even better location than Roosevelt, but *still* gets less demand pressure — less often full or empty; so that one is a mystery to me, or maybe my impression is wrong.)

    #1114195
    Yule
    Participant

    @LhasaCM 210531 wrote:

    Related but unrelated: NPS launched a dockless scooter parking pilot program with DDOT to provide designated parking areas on/around the Mall. https://www.nps.gov/nama/planyourvisit/dockless-scooter-parking.htm

    Thanks — Interesting to see their pilot program is ongoing right now and through Memorial Day weekend 2021.

    I clicked the map to see where their dockless e-bike and e-scooter parking zones are. I couldn’t see any. You have to zoom in really far to see those things. Tiny and scattered. Some or their 19 designated areas seem next to one of the six CaBi stations they’ve allowed on the Mall (at least three of the e-scooter parking zones are, afaict, right at the CaBi stations).

    I’ve been down in the Mall area in the past few weeks and haven’t noticed any of them, but then I am not an e-scooter user so maybe their apps direct them to these places. The people dropping off the re-charged scooters by the hundred every day continue to dump them in rows just outside the Mall area, lots lined up along the north side of Constitution Ave, and near CaBi stations of course (CaBi stations also being, rather awkwardly, forced off National Mall land onto the north side of Constitution Ave), sometimes into tight squeezes (19th St & Constitution Ave being one), but clearly serving Mall-going people.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.