New "speed control" bariers at Roosevelt Island
Our Community › Forums › Road and Trail Conditions › New "speed control" bariers at Roosevelt Island
- This topic has 143 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
Drewdane.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 25, 2011 at 2:37 pm #926149
OneEighth
ParticipantAgain, for anyone wishing to express their concerns directly to the Park Superintendent, here is Ms. Dottie Marshall’s email address: GWMP_Superintendent@nps.gov
Giving the benefit of the doubt for just a moment—it appears that someone had the sense to leave a gap in the new speed bump to allow bikes to swing wide for the turn without having to hit the bump. It’s still bad placement and doesn’t address the underlying design flaw(s), but hey.May 25, 2011 at 3:23 pm #926151Dirt
ParticipantI can’t wait to see what’s next. I am so hoping that they install a catapult that randomly flings trail users into the Potomac.
(Yes. I am being a sarcastic jerk and that isn’t at all helpful. The image in my mind of such a thing was just way too vivid for me to NOT comment.)
I love and respect all mankind.
Pete
May 25, 2011 at 5:01 pm #926152OneEighth
ParticipantDoes it absolutely have to be random…or can I help pick who gets flung?
May 25, 2011 at 8:16 pm #926158consularrider
ParticipantWho gets to hit the eject button?
May 26, 2011 at 12:51 pm #926184Dirt
ParticipantI like the idea of completely random flingings. It adds a bit of suspense to the ride. If someone were actually at the controls, I would know that I had a 100% chance of getting flinged every day. (My bad English and made-up words are intentional. It cuts down on being taken more seriouslier.)
June 1, 2011 at 1:26 pm #926332Dirt
ParticipantI’ve had an ongoing e-mail volley with Dottie Marshal, Park Superintendent. She’s been awesome!!! She e-mailed me this morning and said that she’d been out to observe how traffic flows over the speed bump. She agreed that it needs to be moved to the south of that crosswalk area. That was originally where it was supposed to be installed. They’re going to have the contractor move the speed bump as soon as they can.
I had a great exchange with Superintendent Marshall and was impressed with their attention to detail and safety. They’re really trying to do what is best for all users. Sometimes that balance is hard to find.
Happy riding.
Pete
June 1, 2011 at 1:34 pm #926334OneEighth
Participant@Dirt 3887 wrote:
I like the idea of completely random flingings. It adds a bit of suspense to the ride. If someone were actually at the controls, I would know that I had a 100% chance of getting flinged every day. (My bad English and made-up words are intentional. It cuts down on being taken more seriouslier.)
Reminds me of that Monty Python skit with the flying cat.
June 1, 2011 at 1:55 pm #926335Dirt
Participant@OneEighth 4055 wrote:
Reminds me of that Monty Python skit with the flying cat.
I was actually thinking of :
KEEPER: What is your favorite color?
GALAHAD: Blue. No yel– Auuuuuuuugh!PS: While researching this post, I found the entire script for Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Dang I love the Interwebs. I also like that “Lemon Chiffon” is a color choice for text on this forum. The world is truly a happy place.
June 2, 2011 at 5:56 pm #926397baiskeli
Participant@Dirt 4053 wrote:
I’ve had an ongoing e-mail volley with Dottie Marshal, Park Superintendent. She’s been awesome!!! She e-mailed me this morning and said that she’d been out to observe how traffic flows over the speed bump. She agreed that it needs to be moved to the south of that crosswalk area. That was originally where it was supposed to be installed. They’re going to have the contractor move the speed bump as soon as they can.
South? That doesn’t make sense. I thought it was keeping cyclists from rushing onto the trail at the crosswalk when coming from the north and sideswiping those who take the trail the whole way. At least, it’s accomplishing that now by slowing and/or discouraging bikes in that part of the parking lot.
June 2, 2011 at 6:48 pm #926403Dirt
Participant@baiskeli 4140 wrote:
South? That doesn’t make sense. I thought it was keeping cyclists from rushing onto the trail at the crosswalk when coming from the north and sideswiping those who take the trail the whole way. At least, it’s accomplishing that now by slowing and/or discouraging bikes in that part of the parking lot.
I believe the purpose was to slow cars down around the crosswalk.
June 3, 2011 at 5:20 pm #926437baiskeli
Participant@Dirt 4147 wrote:
I believe the purpose was to slow cars down around the crosswalk.
Okay, well, it’s working to slow cyclists who cut through that side of the parking lot too.
June 6, 2011 at 4:34 pm #926496consularrider
ParticipantBut it is totally gone now (as of Friday afternoon I believe). Wonder if it will make the appearance again?
June 9, 2011 at 1:03 pm #926707consularrider
ParticipantIt’s back…
The speed bump was being reinstalled south of the crosswalk this morning at 8 am.
June 9, 2011 at 1:03 pm #926788consularrider
ParticipantIt’s back…
The speed bump was being reinstalled south of the crosswalk this morning at 8 am.
June 10, 2011 at 1:12 pm #926811Dirt
ParticipantIt’s back and in a much better location…. I like this set-up much better.
New Speed Bump location
Car demonstrating correct speed bump technique.Have a nice day.
Pete
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.