My Evening Commute
Our Community › Forums › Commuters › My Evening Commute
- This topic has 1,933 replies, 155 voices, and was last updated 3 months, 3 weeks ago by
cathy liang.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 13, 2015 at 2:26 pm #1029865
TwoWheelsDC
Participant@mstone 115629 wrote:
Because they don’t want everyone in the office seeing them in full lycra? (Some things just can’t be unseen!) The solution here is simply to wear a longer shirt.
In my experience, it’s less about the length of the shirt than the flappiness of the shirt.
May 13, 2015 at 2:34 pm #1029866mstone
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 115630 wrote:
In my experience, it’s less about the length of the shirt than the flappiness of the shirt.
Both are important–a tight crop top won’t help here.
May 13, 2015 at 2:52 pm #1029868hozn
Participant@mstone 115629 wrote:
Because they don’t want everyone in the office seeing them in full lycra? (Some things just can’t be unseen!) The solution here is simply to wear a longer shirt.
I think Pete’s wondering about non-bibs vs. bibs. Or maybe he did mean baggy shorts?
I think people wear non-bib shorts since they’re slightly simpler and usually cost ~15-20% less than the bib short variant. I agree that bib shorts are a lot more comfortable; I used to wear more “regular” shorts but have switched almost wholesale to bibs. I regard it as an indication of cycling maturity or seriousness now, but I imagine there exist some that still prefer non-bibs for whatever reason.
May 13, 2015 at 3:03 pm #1029869Tim Kelley
Participant@hozn 115634 wrote:
I think Pete’s wondering about non-bibs vs. bibs. Or maybe he did mean baggy shorts?
I think people wear non-bib shorts since they’re slightly simpler and usually cost ~15-20% less than the bib short variant. I agree that bib shorts are a lot more comfortable; I used to wear more “regular” shorts but have switched almost wholesale to bibs. I regard it as an indication of cycling maturity or seriousness now, but I imagine there exist some that still prefer non-bibs for whatever reason.
I’ve heard that some people prefer bibs because the waist band doesn’t cut into their tummy as much?? I’m on the thinner side so I don’t mind either way.
And on the trainer, I think I actually prefer shorts because they’re cooler.
May 13, 2015 at 3:04 pm #1029870mstone
Participant@hozn 115634 wrote:
I think Pete’s wondering about non-bibs vs. bibs. Or maybe he did mean baggy shorts?
I think people wear non-bib shorts since they’re slightly simpler and usually cost ~15-20% less than the bib short variant. I agree that bib shorts are a lot more comfortable; I used to wear more “regular” shorts but have switched almost wholesale to bibs. I regard it as an indication of cycling maturity or seriousness now, but I imagine there exist some that still prefer non-bibs for whatever reason.
I took “regular shorts” to mean “regular shorts”. I.e., not something that a superhero would wear. If I’m going for a long ride (50+ miles?) then definitely bibs. For a commute? It’s not long enough that the pants matter, so I might as well (try to) keep my dignity. Similarly, I don’t wear bibs to go shopping or run errands.
May 13, 2015 at 3:27 pm #1029876Emm
Participant@Tim Kelley 115635 wrote:
I’ve heard that some people prefer bibs because the waist band doesn’t cut into their tummy as much?? I’m on the thinner side so I don’t mind either way.
I think this is only available for women, but bontrager makes shorts with a yoga waistband. They are actually just as comfortable for me as bibs are since the waistband design prevents rolling/cutting in. Plus as a woman, they only JUST started making bathroom friendly bibs (aka ones that you don’t need to strip naked to use the restroom), and I haven’t decided if I need new bibs quite yet.
I wear the above bontrager shorts for my work commute. I just wear a long, slightly baggier shirt with it. I definitely feel inappropriate wearing the shorts in the office so I get out quickly after I change.
May 13, 2015 at 3:35 pm #1029879hozn
ParticipantYeah, I just assumed since he was talking about seeing butt cracks that the cut (i.e. the “bib”) was the significant part — not the material.
Sure, I will wear baggy shorts or jeans or whatever if I am just casually riding with the kids or something.
Tim has a good point about shorts being a bit cooler than bibs.
May 13, 2015 at 4:36 pm #1029883ShawnoftheDread
ParticipantI don’t wear bibs because I don’t like them, either comfort-wise or for practicality. I cover my rear by using shorts and shirts that actually fit me.
May 13, 2015 at 4:39 pm #1029886TwoWheelsDC
Participant@Tim Kelley 115635 wrote:
I’ve heard that some people prefer bibs because the waist band doesn’t cut into their tummy as much??
And since they don’t have a waistband, they smooth over the gut-pelvis transition, giving them a slimming effect as well.
May 13, 2015 at 5:42 pm #1029897pfunkallstar
Participant@ShawnoftheDread 115651 wrote:
I don’t wear bibs because I don’t like them, either comfort-wise or for practicality. I cover my rear by using shorts and shirts that actually fit me.
My clothes fit, for the most part – my issue is more one of “spandex age v. exposure to UVA,” which leads to UVB (you view my butt). I try to strategically pull my jersey over my shorts, but I really just need to get new ones.
May 13, 2015 at 6:11 pm #1029899Crickey7
ParticipantI own no bibs, but I’d definitely choose whichever best shows off my newly desirable “dad bod” to its most curvaceous effect.
May 13, 2015 at 7:15 pm #1029904Powerful Pete
ParticipantWow, that brought on a few comments.
A clarification might be useful: I really don’t care what you wear when you ride, but would appreciate not having to see… ehm… too much of your backside while riding. The best solution for this (in my very humble opinion, of course) are bibs. Feel free to wear what you want, but please think of the children at gravelly point… and the poor slowpoke cyclists like me.
We work hard and should not be… exposed to such things on the ride home! :rolleyes:
May 13, 2015 at 8:14 pm #1029905pfunkallstar
ParticipantNo better incentive to dig deep down and summon a CAT 6 POWER PASS than semi-translucent bike shorts.
May 13, 2015 at 8:27 pm #1029906rcannon100
ParticipantFtfy
powerful pete;115674 wrote:we work hard sitting all day on our fat asses and should not expose such things on the ride home! :rolleyes:May 13, 2015 at 8:47 pm #1029907kwarkentien
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 115654 wrote:
And since they don’t have a waistband, they smooth over the gut-pelvis transition, giving them a slimming effect as well.
I love bibs. I would never go back to bike shorts. My middle-aged, post-menopausal, fat-assed body is not safe for anyone if I don’t wear my bibs. My civvies are ok in the “off” season but I am very cognizant of the potential for shirt creep and the resultant pants drop and am constantly checking to make sure that I am not one of the offenders. I’ve had to witness too many instances of inappropriate skinage and those cannot be unseen, no matter how hard I try.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.