@DrP 129337 wrote:
I know this is supposed to be about the problems that cyclists encounter, this is a case where a cyclist did something completely inappropriate, although apparently a car did the same day too. I was not present, but my neighbors who were watching it all, let me know what happened. My road was temporarily closed while Arlington County was working on the fire hydrant. A cyclist decided that it was unacceptable to turn around and go to another block, or walk the bicycle through the area. Apparently the cyclist decided that my yard was an appropriate bike route and off-roaded to get around all the workers. That is not cool. How do we get people to at least be reasonable.
[Apparently a car decided the same thing too and did a bit of damage. ]
To be honest, if I were a cyclist in this same situation, I would likely off-road it (only if things appeared to be dry) or dismount and walk across the lawn. Also, this is assuming that the construction crew did not put up a sign at the last intersection before the closure (did they?).
@DrP 129346 wrote:
…the next door neighbor who also had their lawn driven over (and lost their FIOS over this).
This is the reason that pedestrians/cyclists can do this but vehicles cannot. Did the cyclist do any damage (grass bounces back, but other things don’t)?
@wheels&wings 129443 wrote:
Personally I think that all suburban homes should have sidewalks out front, in the interest of safety and public health and building livable people-centric communities.
I know I’m nitpicking here, but wouldn’t having a shared space where it is safe for pedestrians and vehicles to coexist (like a woonerf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woonerf ) be a hallmark of a livable people-centric community? Btw, I do somewhat agree with you that sidewalks (both sides if possible) should be standard in most communities, but I do not feel as strongly about it as I used to. I’m more open to the shared space idea than I used to be and think they can actually work when properly implemented.