Let’s talk about e scooters
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › Let’s talk about e scooters
- This topic has 212 replies, 53 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 9 months ago by
Steve O.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 15, 2018 at 8:54 pm #1089053
Emm
ParticipantOne less car, so I support them in the big picture.
I see a few a day, and they’ve never bothered me in the slightest. They go about as fast as a slow bike in the bike lane, so I just pass them when I can if I encounter one. They don’t go fast enough to bother me on sidewalks when I’ve encounter them there.
I think if perhaps hundreds suddenly showed up in the bike lane I’d be ticked, but that hasn’t happened yet so I’m not really concerned. I’m more worried about all the f*cking cars parked in the bike lanes than I am about the occasional scooter I see.
August 15, 2018 at 10:25 pm #1089058n18
ParticipantI noticed that Bird eScooters occupy less footprint than a bike.
August 16, 2018 at 2:09 am #1089061TwoWheelsDC
ParticipantTwo wheels good.
August 16, 2018 at 1:52 pm #1089065Henry
Keymaster@Emm 180292 wrote:
I think if perhaps hundreds suddenly showed up in the bike lane I’d be ticked, …
But wouldn’t that be preferable to hundreds of cars next to you on the street?
August 16, 2018 at 3:56 pm #1089072JustinW
ParticipanteScooters are sort of the present day Segway, really. Open-air personal transportation without exertion. Certain limits apply – they are not very stable, you have to have both hands on the bar pretty much all of the time, and if you want to carry anything, its either using a backpack or *nothing*. Of course, the feeling of cutting through the air feels good on any machine, and one need not sweat while using an eScooter, so I can see some appeal. Overall if these help get folks out of cars, then bring ’em on.
August 18, 2018 at 4:05 am #1089119highline
ParticipantI have seen e-scooters on the bike paths; yet, on the W&OD, at least, signs say “No Motorized Vehicles”. The logical implication is that e-scooters do not belong on the W&OD because they have motors. Same with motorized bikes, electric or gas. I’ve also seen motorized skateboards. I don’t get it. The signs are quite clear, yet I see more and more motorized bikes/scooters/skateboards. And even a guy in a flintstones car that appears to have a motor. Are the signs just a suggestion, or some sort of joke? I tell you, this is the age of boundless confusion.
August 18, 2018 at 1:30 pm #1089121Starduster
ParticipantIt *is* indeed a brave new world, with boundless confusion. First, the advent of the modern E-bike, in varying levels of e-assist to full throttle, such that every governing body worldwide has to reconcile that line when a bicycle becomes a motorcycle. Even StVZO (in its native German: Road Traffic Licensing Regulations) had to write standards for fast E-bikes. And then there are the electric scooters. When the current rules about scooters on trails were implemented decades ago, I don’t think battery-powered scooters even existed, except in someone’s dreams. I made note of this during the last ABAC meeting. And there were *maybe* a few brave/crazy skateboards powered by a 2-stroke gas engine, which could never be employed by a ninja. But they’re out there now, running fast enough to cause great concerns about speed differential and safety on the trails.
We must update our access and safety rules and perhaps even infrastructure to address emerging technology. Still, at the end of the day, if it results in fewer cars clogging the road… net gain.
August 18, 2018 at 3:27 pm #1089122hozn
Participant@highline 180360 wrote:
I have seen e-scooters on the bike paths; yet, on the W&OD, at least, signs say “No Motorized Vehicles”. The logical implication is that e-scooters do not belong on the W&OD because they have motors. Same with motorized bikes, electric or gas. I’ve also seen motorized skateboards. I don’t get it. The signs are quite clear, yet I see more and more motorized bikes/scooters/skateboards. And even a guy in a flintstones car that appears to have a motor. Are the signs just a suggestion, or some sort of joke? I tell you, this is the age of boundless confusion.
To distill countless pages of squabe that have already been written elsewhere on here … While the signs seem clear to the layperson, the issue here is in definitions. And in VA the definition of a motorized vehicle specifically excludes most/many of the vehicles you mention (there is a minimum output wattage before it is classified as a motorized vehicle etc.). There is some disagreement over whether NVRPA can mean something different than VA code. They don’t even attempt to clarify the question, afaik.
In any event, you can think what you want about them and their riders but it’s probably not correct to just assume they’re illegal on all the trails.
August 18, 2018 at 10:23 pm #1089126TwoWheelsDC
ParticipantMaybe just make the trails better instead of handwringing about 15mph e-scooters and e-skateboards?
August 20, 2018 at 8:44 pm #1089157mstone
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 180369 wrote:
Maybe just make the trails better instead of handwringing about 15mph e-scooters and e-skateboards?
LOL, I’m looking for things I can do in the years before I’m dead and buried…
August 21, 2018 at 5:17 pm #1089176sjclaeys
ParticipantAugust 22, 2018 at 7:21 am #1089189TwoWheelsDC
Participant@sjclaeys 180434 wrote:
Buzzfeed piece on e-scooter injuries: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katienotopoulos/e-scooter-injuries-are-becoming-common-in-emergency-rooms?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam&stream=top-stories
37000+ people died in cars in 2016.
August 22, 2018 at 2:56 pm #1089197arlrider
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 180450 wrote:
37000+ people died in cars in 2016.
An absolute figure just begging to be normalized by a population size…would not surprise me if the scooters were in fact more dangerous per mile or hour of use. Of course, they’re also early in the adoption curve and there has been little policy work directed at them, so it would be expected that these would be the subject of relatively more incidents than a more mature technology with established policy and infrastructure.
August 22, 2018 at 3:17 pm #1089198lordofthemark
ParticipantScooters, much like bikes, can help address issues of road congestion, criteria emissions, carbon emissions. The user may not burn many calories while riding them (less than on an ebike, even?) but if it enables a car free or car lite lifestyle, likely improves health outcomes enough to more than offset any dangers from accidents. Not to mention the mental health benefits of being outside. All in all, a good thing.
As someone particularly concerned with improving utilization of our seg infra, and broadening the constituency for it, I welcome them to share MUPs and bike lanes with us. I also note that all the arguments against allowing ebikes on the trails, apply more weakly or not at all to e scooters.
August 22, 2018 at 4:14 pm #1089199creadinger
Participant@arlrider 180458 wrote:
An absolute figure just begging to be normalized by a population size…would not surprise me if the scooters were in fact more dangerous per mile or hour of use. Of course, they’re also early in the adoption curve and there has been little policy work directed at them, so it would be expected that these would be the subject of relatively more incidents than a more mature technology with established policy and infrastructure.
They also may already surpass bicycles with regard to embarrassingly bad “journalism”…. like this story from Cleveland.com. https://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2018/08/woman_riding_electric_scooter.html
You wouldn’t know it from the headline, but the driver of the car was 19 and drunk! And it ends with this brilliant bit – “The scooters have been known to cause injuries to their riders in 32 other American cities where they’ve appeared over the past year.”
Yeah! Injuries tend to happen when you get drunk and mow people down in your cars!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.