Let’s talk about e scooters

Our Community Forums General Discussion Let’s talk about e scooters

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 212 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1089053
    Emm
    Participant

    One less car, so I support them in the big picture.

    I see a few a day, and they’ve never bothered me in the slightest. They go about as fast as a slow bike in the bike lane, so I just pass them when I can if I encounter one. They don’t go fast enough to bother me on sidewalks when I’ve encounter them there.

    I think if perhaps hundreds suddenly showed up in the bike lane I’d be ticked, but that hasn’t happened yet so I’m not really concerned. I’m more worried about all the f*cking cars parked in the bike lanes than I am about the occasional scooter I see.

    #1089058
    n18
    Participant

    I noticed that Bird eScooters occupy less footprint than a bike.

    #1089061
    TwoWheelsDC
    Participant

    Two wheels good.

    #1089065
    Henry
    Keymaster

    @Emm 180292 wrote:

    I think if perhaps hundreds suddenly showed up in the bike lane I’d be ticked, …

    But wouldn’t that be preferable to hundreds of cars next to you on the street?

    #1089072
    JustinW
    Participant

    eScooters are sort of the present day Segway, really. Open-air personal transportation without exertion. Certain limits apply – they are not very stable, you have to have both hands on the bar pretty much all of the time, and if you want to carry anything, its either using a backpack or *nothing*. Of course, the feeling of cutting through the air feels good on any machine, and one need not sweat while using an eScooter, so I can see some appeal. Overall if these help get folks out of cars, then bring ’em on.

    #1089119
    highline
    Participant

    I have seen e-scooters on the bike paths; yet, on the W&OD, at least, signs say “No Motorized Vehicles”. The logical implication is that e-scooters do not belong on the W&OD because they have motors. Same with motorized bikes, electric or gas. I’ve also seen motorized skateboards. I don’t get it. The signs are quite clear, yet I see more and more motorized bikes/scooters/skateboards. And even a guy in a flintstones car that appears to have a motor. Are the signs just a suggestion, or some sort of joke? I tell you, this is the age of boundless confusion.

    #1089121
    Starduster
    Participant

    It *is* indeed a brave new world, with boundless confusion. First, the advent of the modern E-bike, in varying levels of e-assist to full throttle, such that every governing body worldwide has to reconcile that line when a bicycle becomes a motorcycle. Even StVZO (in its native German: Road Traffic Licensing Regulations) had to write standards for fast E-bikes. And then there are the electric scooters. When the current rules about scooters on trails were implemented decades ago, I don’t think battery-powered scooters even existed, except in someone’s dreams. I made note of this during the last ABAC meeting. And there were *maybe* a few brave/crazy skateboards powered by a 2-stroke gas engine, which could never be employed by a ninja. But they’re out there now, running fast enough to cause great concerns about speed differential and safety on the trails.

    We must update our access and safety rules and perhaps even infrastructure to address emerging technology. Still, at the end of the day, if it results in fewer cars clogging the road… net gain.

    #1089122
    hozn
    Participant

    @highline 180360 wrote:

    I have seen e-scooters on the bike paths; yet, on the W&OD, at least, signs say “No Motorized Vehicles”. The logical implication is that e-scooters do not belong on the W&OD because they have motors. Same with motorized bikes, electric or gas. I’ve also seen motorized skateboards. I don’t get it. The signs are quite clear, yet I see more and more motorized bikes/scooters/skateboards. And even a guy in a flintstones car that appears to have a motor. Are the signs just a suggestion, or some sort of joke? I tell you, this is the age of boundless confusion.

    To distill countless pages of squabe that have already been written elsewhere on here … While the signs seem clear to the layperson, the issue here is in definitions. And in VA the definition of a motorized vehicle specifically excludes most/many of the vehicles you mention (there is a minimum output wattage before it is classified as a motorized vehicle etc.). There is some disagreement over whether NVRPA can mean something different than VA code. They don’t even attempt to clarify the question, afaik.

    In any event, you can think what you want about them and their riders but it’s probably not correct to just assume they’re illegal on all the trails.

    #1089126
    TwoWheelsDC
    Participant

    Maybe just make the trails better instead of handwringing about 15mph e-scooters and e-skateboards?

    #1089157
    mstone
    Participant

    @TwoWheelsDC 180369 wrote:

    Maybe just make the trails better instead of handwringing about 15mph e-scooters and e-skateboards?

    LOL, I’m looking for things I can do in the years before I’m dead and buried…

    #1089176
    sjclaeys
    Participant
    #1089189
    TwoWheelsDC
    Participant
    #1089197
    arlrider
    Participant

    @TwoWheelsDC 180450 wrote:

    37000+ people died in cars in 2016.

    An absolute figure just begging to be normalized by a population size…would not surprise me if the scooters were in fact more dangerous per mile or hour of use. Of course, they’re also early in the adoption curve and there has been little policy work directed at them, so it would be expected that these would be the subject of relatively more incidents than a more mature technology with established policy and infrastructure.

    #1089198
    lordofthemark
    Participant

    Scooters, much like bikes, can help address issues of road congestion, criteria emissions, carbon emissions. The user may not burn many calories while riding them (less than on an ebike, even?) but if it enables a car free or car lite lifestyle, likely improves health outcomes enough to more than offset any dangers from accidents. Not to mention the mental health benefits of being outside. All in all, a good thing.

    As someone particularly concerned with improving utilization of our seg infra, and broadening the constituency for it, I welcome them to share MUPs and bike lanes with us. I also note that all the arguments against allowing ebikes on the trails, apply more weakly or not at all to e scooters.

    #1089199
    creadinger
    Participant

    @arlrider 180458 wrote:

    An absolute figure just begging to be normalized by a population size…would not surprise me if the scooters were in fact more dangerous per mile or hour of use. Of course, they’re also early in the adoption curve and there has been little policy work directed at them, so it would be expected that these would be the subject of relatively more incidents than a more mature technology with established policy and infrastructure.

    They also may already surpass bicycles with regard to embarrassingly bad “journalism”…. like this story from Cleveland.com. https://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2018/08/woman_riding_electric_scooter.html

    You wouldn’t know it from the headline, but the driver of the car was 19 and drunk! And it ends with this brilliant bit – “The scooters have been known to cause injuries to their riders in 32 other American cities where they’ve appeared over the past year.”

    Yeah! Injuries tend to happen when you get drunk and mow people down in your cars!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 212 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.