Let’s talk about e scooters
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › Let’s talk about e scooters
- This topic has 212 replies, 53 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 5 months ago by
Steve O.
-
AuthorReplies
-
August 31, 2018 at 7:27 pm #1089334
huskerdont
ParticipantBike Snob NYC Outside article on sharable e-Scooters in Portland.
https://www.outsideonline.com/2340806/dockless-scooters-cities-pros-cons-bikesnob
September 1, 2018 at 7:51 pm #1089353dasgeh
Participant@AlexandriaBiker 180496 wrote:
A little late to this party but I will throw my .02 in here. I fully support scooters and e-bikes and want to see them in the bike lanes. Anything we can do to increase demand for “alternative transportation lanes” makes them more viable for the community. And scooters and e-bikes offer transportation to people that dont have or dont want access to cars. Yes the riders dont follow the law all the time and that is unfortunate. The same is true for drivers of large gas powered vehicles and that is unfortunate too.
Some people are a$$hats and they will be a$$hats on whatever tool they have available to them. Not news, and not a reason to be against escooters generally, in my book.
September 4, 2018 at 7:54 pm #1089438
lordofthemarkParticipantSeptember 7, 2018 at 3:20 am #1089525Dewey
ParticipantSobering article in the Post about e-scooters maintenance issues, I was surprised to read about the wide open throttle (WOT) problem, as an ebike owner I would have thought these scooters would have motor inhibitors on the brake levers to cut the power each time the rider pulls a brake lever. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/scooter-use-is-rising-in-major-cities-so-are-trips-to-the-emergency-room/2018/09/06/53d6a8d4-abd6-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?utm_term=.03f0390e5ab4
September 22, 2018 at 3:32 pm #1089937Dewey
ParticipantAwful, 20 is no age to die, reminds me of the young student run down and killed in a crosswalk by a car exiting Washington circle in Foggy Bottom a couple of years ago. Perhaps DC DOT could look into speeding up the timer on the light outside of rush hours so people aren’t waiting so long for the walk signal. Ought the scooter companies pay to educate riders by subsidizing e-scootering classes? Something like the WABA City cycling class with new drills for riding an e-scooter on sidewalks, in traffic, and navigating traffic circles.
September 25, 2018 at 4:48 pm #1090037hozn
ParticipantThis e-scooter craze is intriguing. From a transportation perspective this makes so much more sense to me than bike-share e-bikes (or non-assist bike-share bikes): they go fast enough, are far more compact/maneuverable, can be ridden more places (even if they shouldn’t be), and have a lower barrier to entry. If you’re trying to just save time on a couple-mile errand, who wants to actually pedal a damn bicycle!? I mean, it’s not going to do anything to further cycling itself, so *we* might be sad, but honestly even I would rather use an e-scooter than an e-bike if it’s just about speeding up pedestrian transportation. And it’s not like an e-bike is doing anything to further the sport of cycling, so no love lost there. Sure, bikes could haul more stuff, so maybe we’ll see some bikeshare e-cargo bikes that might differentiate themselves. But that’s still gonna be a tiny percentage of the people who want to speed up their walk to the metro or the drug store.
It’s a bit funny that e-bikes have been such a point of controversy. The real future of e-assist transportation probably looks a lot more like this.
And, yeah, it’s also going to generate its due share of controversy. Just the other evening in Clarendon a couple of dudes in brown flipflops were zigzagging through peds on the sidewalk at 12+mph like a bunch of jackasses. Hey, maybe it’ll shift the target of all the hatred away from bikes.
September 25, 2018 at 4:59 pm #1090040
lordofthemarkParticipant@hozn 181393 wrote:
This e-scooter craze is intriguing. From a transportation perspective this makes so much more sense to me than bike-share e-bikes (or non-assist bike-share bikes): they go fast enough, are far more compact/maneuverable, can be ridden more places (even if they shouldn’t be), and have a lower barrier to entry. If you’re trying to just save time on a couple-mile errand, who wants to actually pedal a damn bicycle!? I mean, it’s not going to do anything to further cycling itself, so *we* might be sad, but honestly even I would rather use an e-scooter than an e-bike if it’s just about speeding up pedestrian transportation. And it’s not like an e-bike is doing anything to further the sport of cycling, so no love lost there. Sure, bikes could haul more stuff, so maybe we’ll see some bikeshare e-cargo bikes that might differentiate themselves. But that’s still gonna be a tiny percentage of the people who want to speed up their walk to the metro or the drug store.
It’s a bit funny that e-bikes have been such a point of controversy. The real future of e-assist transportation probably looks a lot more like this.
And, yeah, it’s also going to generate its due share of controversy. Just the other evening in Clarendon a couple of dudes in brown flipflops were zigzagging through peds on the sidewalk at 12+mph like a bunch of jackasses. Hey, maybe it’ll shift the target of all the hatred away from bikes.
I would question that escooter net can go more places than bikeshare bikes -neither should be ridden on a crowded sidewalk, and either can be ridden on an empty sidewalk. Maybe there are some grey area sidewalks where its appropriate to ride an escooter but not a bike. I definitely find a bike feels safer on a wider variety of rides, because its easier to signal and to brake, and I feel you are a bit more visible. Both of course are fine in bike lanes.
There are clearly some people who feel comfortable on a scooter (the RAZR scooter generation?) and not so comfortable on a bike, especially when wearing business clothes. I am glad this expands the possibilities for non auto transportation and last mile from transit issues (I hope its not all walking substitution) and also glad this expands the constituency for safe streets and for bike infra. But I don’t think this will at all obviate the importance of bike share.
September 26, 2018 at 4:14 pm #1090088Drewdane
ParticipantI finally came across one outside my office yesterday and decided to give it a try. It was mildly terrifying, but nothing I couldn’t get used to. I did come away with the impression that CaBi and plain ol’ hoofing it are all the options I really need, though. YMMV.
September 26, 2018 at 8:16 pm #1090099TwoWheelsDC
Participant@hozn 181393 wrote:
This e-scooter craze is intriguing. From a transportation perspective this makes so much more sense to me than bike-share e-bikes (or non-assist bike-share bikes): they go fast enough, are far more compact/maneuverable, can be ridden more places (even if they shouldn’t be), and have a lower barrier to entry. If you’re trying to just save time on a couple-mile errand, who wants to actually pedal a damn bicycle!? I mean, it’s not going to do anything to further cycling itself, so *we* might be sad, but honestly even I would rather use an e-scooter than an e-bike if it’s just about speeding up pedestrian transportation. And it’s not like an e-bike is doing anything to further the sport of cycling, so no love lost there. Sure, bikes could haul more stuff, so maybe we’ll see some bikeshare e-cargo bikes that might differentiate themselves. But that’s still gonna be a tiny percentage of the people who want to speed up their walk to the metro or the drug store.
It’s a bit funny that e-bikes have been such a point of controversy. The real future of e-assist transportation probably looks a lot more like this.
And, yeah, it’s also going to generate its due share of controversy. Just the other evening in Clarendon a couple of dudes in brown flipflops were zigzagging through peds on the sidewalk at 12+mph like a bunch of jackasses. Hey, maybe it’ll shift the target of all the hatred away from bikes.
I seem to remember reading an article a few weeks ago that judged e-bikeshares were ultimately the fastest, followed by e-scooters (I may have that backward…it was close either way, and now I can’t find the article). I haven’t tried a scooter yet (personally I would get on a Jump or CaBi+ before a e-scooter), but my understanding is that scooters are not suited to going up hills of any kind. So around downtown they may be okay, but if you’re going up to Columbia Heights or something, you’ll want to grab a Jump or CaBi+.
September 26, 2018 at 11:43 pm #1090106n18
ParticipantFew days ago, I observed someone taking his folding Bird-like eScooter on Metro. It took a lot less space than a folding bike. So, I am going to start recommending them.
September 27, 2018 at 1:45 am #1090109hozn
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 181450 wrote:
I seem to remember reading an article a few weeks ago that judged e-bikeshares were ultimately the fastest, followed by e-scooters (I may have that backward…it was close either way, and now I can’t find the article). I haven’t tried a scooter yet (personally I would get on a Jump or CaBi+ before a e-scooter), but my understanding is that scooters are not suited to going up hills of any kind. So around downtown they may be okay, but if you’re going up to Columbia Heights or something, you’ll want to grab a Jump or CaBi+.
I believe that, but I still feel that a scooter is “fast enough” for cruising around between transport stops without a helmet etc. And it’s only a matter of time before there are stronger motors, etc. Conceptually the scooter makes more sense to me for short trips from pretty much every angle other than “hauling capacity”.
I’d always rather ride *my* bike. But I think I’d rather use an e-scooter than a cabi if I’m just looking for convenient short-trip transportation.
It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.
September 27, 2018 at 4:32 pm #1090117dasgeh
ParticipantOn scooters, it seems like they are less stable, particularly at speed, and less able to carry stuff than bikes. But they take up less space and they are easier to get on and off than bikes. I don’t think e-assist fundamentally changes those facts, they just make it easier to go faster on either a scooter or a bike.
Given that, I think some people will prefer bikes, and others will prefer scooters. For the rest – people who are fine with either – scooters are probably better for shorter trips (particularly because they are slower), bikes for longer.
Also, early adopters of anything are going to be less risk adverse than the general population. Plus, the first few times anyone uses anything, they’re going to make mistakes/misjudge/etc. Finally, new stuff generally seems weird and stands out to most people. So, I’m not at all surprised that the average person sees people using scooters now as not well-behaved. I imagine that the scooter-ers take risks more than most and that they misjudge how fast they can go in new situations. Also, an adult riding a scooter sticks out to the average person more than other things. And some people are just jerks. But I rather have those jerks on scooters than in a car. We should address putting limits on bad behavior through regulation and infrastructure.
November 14, 2018 at 5:52 pm #1091315Dewey
ParticipantAlexandria to roll out scooter program The Post’s Gridlock reports the City of Alexandria will run its own scooter trial
November 15, 2018 at 7:06 am #1091337consularrider
ParticipantAnd not an e-scooter to be seen in Frankfurt
November 16, 2018 at 11:25 pm #1091428Oldtowner
ParticipantAccording to Catherine Rampell E-scooters are like Q-tips.
“In both cases, the products are marketed with explicit warnings about how not to use them, even though everyone knows that’s precisely the way pretty much every customer will use them.”
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.