What to do with video of dangerous driver at signaled crosswalk in Arlington?
Our Community › Forums › Crashes, Close Calls and Incidents › What to do with video of dangerous driver at signaled crosswalk in Arlington?
- This topic has 16 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 9 months ago by
elbows.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 8, 2022 at 5:14 pm #1121692
Brett L.
Participant@EasyRider 219269 wrote:
What’s the most productive course of action here?
Stop donating to AAA and other members of the car lobby.
June 8, 2022 at 7:00 pm #1121693chris_s
ParticipantI just wanted to share that the county is proposing to add a project to its Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to upgrade the Glebe & 9th St intersection, including adding a full traffic signal. That plan is in draft form, there will be a public hearing at the end of June and then a final plan will be adopted in July.
This project was one of the priorities we rode for at Bike4ThePike back in 2018 and it’s great to see some potential progress on it.
One positive potential use of the video is emailing it to the County Board along with a note about the dangers you have experienced at this intersection and encouraging them to move this project up in the Capital plan to happen faster (though I’m not 100% clear on its current schedule, to be honest).
June 8, 2022 at 7:37 pm #1121694EasyRider
Participant@chris_s 219272 wrote:
I just wanted to share that the county is proposing to add a project to its Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to upgrade the Glebe & 9th St intersection, including adding a full traffic signal. That plan is in draft form, there will be a public hearing at the end of June and then a final plan will be adopted in July.
This project was one of the priorities we rode for at Bike4ThePike back in 2018 and it’s great to see some potential progress on it.
One positive potential use of the video is emailing it to the County Board along with a note about the dangers you have experienced at this intersection and encouraging them to move this project up in the Capital plan to happen faster (though I’m not 100% clear on its current schedule, to be honest).
Thank you Chris, I think I will email the video to the County Board and ask them to expedite this project.
June 8, 2022 at 8:09 pm #1121695mstone
ParticipantFull traffic light: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/06/07/fairfax-crash-pedestrians-injured/
More traffic lights aren’t going to fix this sort of thing, only redesigning roads to reduce conflicts and lower speeds while changing the culture to make speeding and aggressive driving unacceptable can fix this. But that’s unlikely to happen as pedestrian safety is not a priority in this country.
June 9, 2022 at 2:00 pm #1121699EasyRider
ParticipantAgree, it won’t fix it. However, I do think a traffic light in this location would be more convenient for cyclists and pedestrians, and relatively safer than the current lighted crosswalk, which most drivers feel free to ignore.
FWIW, I did file a police report. I called the non-emergency number and they advised me to file an online report. I told them I looked into that and none of the category options were related to pedestrian or cyclist safety. Half of them were property crimes involving vehicles. I would’ve thought keeping children safe from reckless drivers might be as important as recovering stolen airbags and pocket change, but I guess not.
Dispatch said, “I know” when I told them about the categories and suggested I file my report under “suspicious circumstances.” I did so and described upfront that this was not a case of suspicious circumstances, but clear video evidence of failure to yield and reckless driving. I was able to input license plate and VIN info, so hopefully my report is taken seriously.
I will be updating this post to note progress, or lack thereof.
June 9, 2022 at 4:35 pm #1121701Starduster
Participant#EasyRider, keep us updated. I agree, a full traffic light should be considered here, especially since the new hi-rise on the old Westmont site is going to add to population and traffic volume. It requires patience & alertness in tandem to cross half-safely here.
June 16, 2022 at 3:22 pm #1121728kwarkentien
ParticipantSend it to Dave Statter. He’s a retired reporter from Channel 9, a former volunteer firefighter, and runs a website, Statter911. He posts all sorts of videos of near misses and stupid drivers on I-395 as well as calls out local 911 services (DC) and other actions that endanger resident safety. Most of the stuff on his website is fire department-related, but he lives here in Arlington and is a rabble-rouser for safety. Might be worth a try.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
June 22, 2022 at 4:32 pm #1121720Brendan von Buckingham
Participant@EasyRider 219269 wrote:
Good morning everyone, I could use some forum wisdom about what to do with video of a really dangerous traffic violation.
This morning I was riding with my 8 year old to school. We dismount and use the beg button to cross Glebe Road at 9th St South on foot. It is part of the County’s “bike boulevard” running parallel to Columbia Pike. Pushing the beg button activates blinking lights that cars can see from a block away.
Our routine is that my kid gets to push the button. While he’s doing that, I get out my phone and start recording video. I do this every time we cross. I’ve found that holding up my phone so that drivers can see I’m recording our crossing encourages them to stop for the blinking lights. This morning, it didn’t work.
After we had already crossed the median, a driver accelerated, swerved and changed lanes, passing with a couple feet in front of us. He blasted through the crosswalk after the lights had been blinking for awhile. In my 20 years of riding a bike in Arlington, it was the closest call I’ve ever had. I captured the entire incident in one unbroken video clip, from the time my son pushed the beg button to the car speeding away. I have the driver’s face, the car’s make and model, and his license plate.
My question is, what is the most effective use of this video? I will report the incident to the police, so that I can say I did. I’m sorry to be cynical, but I don’t really expect that will accomplish anything; the police will just say they didn’t witness anything themselves. I’m not sure providing police video of the incident would change that. Honestly, I wonder if I need to give this video to someone more important than me. I’m just a nobody on a bike with his kid. To be clear, I don’t want to “dox” anyone but this driver’s actions are how children get killed on their way to school.
Ultimately, I do hope the driver is ticketed. But my larger aim is that videos like this one would lead to more enforcement and public awareness of pedestrian safety.
What’s the most productive course of action here?
Video would be more useful convincing transportation planners that they’ve implemented ROW crosswalks across multi-lane roads inrcorrectly. There are no zig zag shoulder lines. In Europe the zig zags declare the zone a no passing zone; do not pass stopped vehicles (because they’re stopped for a good reason). Without the zig zags the oncoming car in the far lane sees a stopped car in the near lane for no apparent reason and enjoys the pass and getting ahead. Except for the pedestrians in the crosswalk blocked from line of sight because of the stopped car.
ROW crosswalks over multi-lane roads without zigzags is a tragedy waiting to happen. And also too, teach Amercian drivers what the zig zag means.
Scariest thing I ever witnessed was seeing a woman crosswalk across Wilson courtesy of a car stopped in the near lane. Tow truck flying up the far lane not seeing or knowing a thing. Lady stepped into the far lane. Tow truck stood on the brakes and stopped with an inch to spare. Woman got to far curb and just collapsed hysterically sobbing. It was that close.
June 23, 2022 at 1:52 pm #1121736mstone
Participant@Brendan von Buckingham 219425 wrote:
Video would be more useful convincing transportation planners that they’ve implemented ROW crosswalks across multi-lane roads inrcorrectly.
But it won’t convince them of that because the only metrics they use are things like “how many cars can pass this spot in an hour”. Anything that slows down cars is a negative impact to the metrics. Until we manage to force them to use metrics like “do people feel safe walking here” and prioritize those metrics higher than vehicle level of service, they aren’t going to change.
June 23, 2022 at 5:20 pm #1121721n18
ParticipantThese types of signals are a waste of money that better spent on better infrastructure. I thought HAWK Beacons are a better option, until I witnessed a car ignoring its 4 solid red lights and speeding(~35-40 MPH) while a lady and her kid were waiting to cross. They had the walk signal at the time, but luckily she looked before crossing. This was in Vienna, Maple Ave(RT123), 3 blocks west of the W&OD intersection(Street View here).
June 23, 2022 at 7:36 pm #1121722mstone
Participant@n18 219429 wrote:
These types of signals are a waste of money that better spent on better infrastructure. I thought HAWK Beacons are a better option, until I witnessed a car ignoring its 4 solid red lights and speeding(~35-40 MPH) while a lady and her kid were waiting to cross. They had the walk signal at the time, but luckily she looked before crossing.
yes, there’s no safe way for pedestrians to cross large high speed roads. the options are 1) slow down the cars 2) design unsafe crossings 3) get rid of the pedestrians.
June 23, 2022 at 9:12 pm #1121724consularrider
Participant@mstone 219430 wrote:
yes, there’s no safe way for pedestrians to cross large high speed roads. the options are 1) slow down the cars 2) design unsafe crossings 3) get rid of the pedestrians.
I really like option #1, but it would require major re-education camps for those pesky drivers. Maybe shock collars for when they are speeding?
June 24, 2022 at 2:15 pm #1121737mstone
Participant@consularrider 219431 wrote:
I really like option #1, but it would require major re-education camps for those pesky drivers. Maybe shock collars for when they are speeding?
no, it just requires redesigning the roads. but since that would affect vehicle level of service metrics, it can’t be done.
June 24, 2022 at 6:29 pm #1121738lordofthemark
Participant@mstone 219437 wrote:
no, it just requires redesigning the roads. but since that would affect vehicle level of service metrics, it can’t be done.
Some roads get redesigned. It just takes way more effort by advocates than it should.
July 13, 2022 at 4:56 pm #1121743EasyRider
ParticipantOP here, posting a update.
As I mentioned, I followed the advice of the non-emergency dispatch and filed a report. I described the events, and provided the license plate, and said I had video to share. After a week, I had gotten no response so I called to get the case number and assigned detective. I decided to wait another week. After two weeks, still nothing from police, so I emailed the assigned detective. He was polite enough, but it was pretty obvious to me that if I hadn’t contacted him I’d have never heard from them. He was quick to point out this was a traffic violation and not a criminal case. I responded, yes, I know. I then asked if having video of the incident would allow the police to issue a traffic citation. That was several weeks ago, and I’ve not heard from the detective since.
The silent treatment leads me to believe that they probably can issue a citation, but have just about zero interest in doing so. I understand or imagine the reasons why, but being ignored like this has increased my cynicism about the police when it comes to matters of pedestrian and cyclist safety. I’ve nothing against the detective, but I’d guess his superiors are focused on airbag thefts and loud mufflers.
In the end, I decided not to share the video, knowing there was at least a decent chance what it did or didn’t show would be used against me, to make it my fault, or my son’s. Sorry there’s no happy ending here.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.