What shoe booties do you recommend?
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › What shoe booties do you recommend?
- This topic has 35 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 2 months ago by
Geoff.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 6, 2014 at 3:35 pm #993102
TwoWheelsDC
ParticipantYeah…that’s why I just said f&*% it” and bought legit winter riding shoes. With a thick pair of socks, they’re warm (enough) into the single digits, they’re completely waterproof, and I expect that they’ll last years, even with using them every day (they are Sidis, after all). Also, they look cool, while shoe covers absolutely do not.
February 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm #993107Steve
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 76733 wrote:
Yeah…that’s why I just said f&*% it” and bought legit winter riding shoes. With a thick pair of socks, they’re warm (enough) into the single digits, they’re completely waterproof, and I expect that they’ll last years, even with using them every day (they are Sidis, after all). Also, they look cool, while shoe covers absolutely do not.
Oh. My. God. I think my paycheck just got a few hundred dollars lighter. Plus if you take the cleat off and wear some ultra-tapered jeans, you can go to any Euro club you want…
February 6, 2014 at 3:45 pm #993108ShawnoftheDread
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 76733 wrote:
Yeah…that’s why I just said f&*% it” and bought legit winter riding shoes. With a thick pair of socks, they’re warm (enough) into the single digits, they’re completely waterproof, and I expect that they’ll last years, even with using them every day (they are Sidis, after all). Also, they look cool, while shoe covers absolutely do not.
My toes got warmer just looking at the webpage.
February 6, 2014 at 4:45 pm #993115Subby
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 76733 wrote:
Yeah…that’s why I just said f&*% it” and bought legit winter riding shoes. With a thick pair of socks, they’re warm (enough) into the single digits, they’re completely waterproof, and I expect that they’ll last years, even with using them every day (they are Sidis, after all). Also, they look cool, while shoe covers absolutely do not.
This belongs in the Covet thread. Holy god they look awesome.
February 6, 2014 at 5:10 pm #993118off2ride
ParticipantGore Windstopper booties works for me.
February 6, 2014 at 5:17 pm #993119consularrider
Participant@Steve 76738 wrote:
Oh. My. God. I think my paycheck just got a few hundred dollars lighter. Plus if you take the cleat off and wear some ultra-tapered jeans, you can go to any Euro club you want…
Come on they’re spd compatible, no need to take off the cleats!
February 6, 2014 at 6:37 pm #993132MattAune
Participant@Steve 76738 wrote:
Oh. My. God. I think my paycheck just got a few hundred dollars lighter. Plus if you take the cleat off and wear some ultra-tapered jeans, you can go to any Euro club you want…
The Specialized ones are cheaper, and look more like something you would see on the Death Star. http://www.specialized.com/us/en/ftr/shoes/mtb-shoes/defroster-trail
February 6, 2014 at 6:47 pm #993136jrenaut
ParticipantIt seems to me you all are suggesting we violate Rule 34.
I mean, not that I’m not already violating Rule 34 regularly.
February 6, 2014 at 7:23 pm #993139TwoWheelsDC
Participant@jrenaut 76769 wrote:
It seems to me you all are suggesting we violate Rule 34.
I mean, not that I’m not already violating Rule 34 regularly.
The solution: http://www.sidiamerica.com/sidi/road/hydro.html
February 6, 2014 at 7:35 pm #993142jrenaut
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 76772 wrote:
The solution: http://www.sidiamerica.com/sidi/road/hydro.html
Well played, but I don’t actually want road shoes. I walk too much and don’t actually mind having MTB shoes. Anyway, my bike is officially a cross bike and effectively a commuter/errand bike and I don’t expect anyone who really cares about Rule 34 would call it a road bike.
February 6, 2014 at 7:43 pm #993144mstone
Participant@TwoWheelsDC 76772 wrote:
The solution: http://www.sidiamerica.com/sidi/road/hydro.html
wow, cycle-specific ice skates! what will they think of next?
February 6, 2014 at 11:49 pm #993173hozn
ParticipantI have been wearing Northwave boots and they aren’t much warmer than good covers. My feet don’t last more than an hour below 25F. But the fit is excellent for me; they are water proof; and the quality is top notch. Recently I decided to take advantage of a UK online store sale to buy the warmer edition. (They were around $180, if I remember right.)
I decided to go with the hi-viz model since they are almost exclusively used for commuting:
http://www.northwave.com/it/product/_artic_commuter_mFebruary 7, 2014 at 12:28 am #993177Oldtowner
ParticipantThis is why my pedals take street shoes, too. I wear regular waterproof low duck boots when it gets below 15 degrees. Feet never get cold or wet. Waterproof socks fill the gap between the rain/snow pants and the shoes. In general, I find in weather that cold, ski clothes are the only way to go.
February 7, 2014 at 2:18 am #993182vvill
Participant@Oldtowner 76810 wrote:
This is why my pedals take street shoes, too. I wear regular waterproof low duck boots when it gets below 15 degrees. Feet never get cold or wet. Waterproof socks fill the gap between the rain/snow pants and the shoes. In general, I find in weather that cold, ski clothes are the only way to go.
Yeah I’ve only worn (non cycling) winter waterproof boots on flat pedals the coldest and iciest days this winter. When it’s that cold and I’m lugging around 40lbs of studded tire bike I don’t find it makes it significantly slower, or less efficient – and it’s handy to be able to stick out a leg if I do slip on ice.
I’ve sort of given up on the bootie/shoe cover thing. I still use them to reduce the amount of moisture in my shoes or delay its onset, and keep me warmer, but since I don’t own any waterproof trousers, socks, gaiters, etc. there’s really no way I could stay dry without getting a more complete solution and I don’t really want to buy another set of bike shoes. I can also never keep my toes warm enough in shoe covers under 32F or so (haven’t tried chemical warmers yet).
February 7, 2014 at 3:30 am #993190Tim Kelley
Participant@Dickie 76726 wrote:
My only qualm was the ankle opening being far too large. With the velcro strap pulled tight I still had excess material folded over. Not a huge concern since my tights cover this section, but if you plan to wear them with exposed legs in the rain don’t be surprised if water runs down into your shoes.
Interesting–I just got a pair of the RXLs (in size XL) and the ankle hole was just right. I never thought of myself as having particularly large ankles.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.