Virginia Legislation Action Thread
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › Virginia Legislation Action Thread
- This topic has 84 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by
baiskeli.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 19, 2013 at 10:34 pm #962927
Mark Blacknell
Participant@sjclaeys 44307 wrote:
Asking for feedback the same week that the bill was introduced does not constitute meaningful outreach. I doubt that her interaction with Loudoun County officials was limited to that week.
Loudoun County had a lobbyist on the case, sent a Sheriff’s Deputy down to (ultimately not) testify, and her Legislative Assistant was presenting crash figures from a (erroneous, as best as I could tell) Loudoun-prepared fact sheet.
February 25, 2013 at 4:21 pm #963196GuyContinental
ParticipantSo, I don’t know if it was related but there was a Loudoun trooper well hidden at the Van Buren crossing bright and early this morning. Which is awesome since Van Buren is completely deserted (as in tumbleweeds blowing through) at 7am. Sure am glad that I hung out shivering at that light for 6 minutes while one car passed. I feel safer already.
February 25, 2013 at 4:34 pm #963197mstone
ParticipantWe need a “pedestrian level of service” where intersections fail if pedestrians have to wait several minutes at empty intersections. W&OD at gallows is the same way–really short walk signal, then it will refuse to give pedestrians a signal again for several minutes. The funny thing is, you usually have to stand at an empty street for a while, then cars come just before they finally get a red.
February 25, 2013 at 4:34 pm #963198FFX_Hinterlands
Participant@GuyContinental 44600 wrote:
So, I don’t know if it was related but there was a Loudoun trooper well hidden at the Van Buren crossing bright and early this morning. Which is awesome since Van Buren is completely deserted (as in tumbleweeds blowing through) at 7am. Sure am glad that I hung out shivering at that light for 6 minutes while one car passed. I feel safer already.
You sure it wasn’t a Herndon Police Car? They sit there and nail people coming down the hill toward the Herndon Post office. I don’t think Herndon has a stop sign ordinance yet, but I’ve heard them say they like to “write warnings” to “keep tabs” on repeat offenders.
February 25, 2013 at 4:58 pm #963201bobco85
Participant@GuyContinental 44600 wrote:
So, I don’t know if it was related but there was a Loudoun trooper well hidden at the Van Buren crossing bright and early this morning. Which is awesome since Van Buren is completely deserted (as in tumbleweeds blowing through) at 7am. Sure am glad that I hung out shivering at that light for 6 minutes while one car passed. I feel safer already.
@mstone 44601 wrote:
We need a “pedestrian level of service” where intersections fail if pedestrians have to wait several minutes at empty intersections. W&OD at gallows is the same way–really short walk signal, then it will refuse to give pedestrians a signal again for several minutes. The funny thing is, you usually have to stand at an empty street for a while, then cars come just before they finally get a red.
I don’t want to derail the conversation, but in both the situations that I have quoted, it seems that the 2 minute law (VA Code § 46.2-833) would apply, allowing each of you to cross on a red.
February 25, 2013 at 4:58 pm #963202GuyContinental
ParticipantHonestly not sure- coloration looked like Loudoun but I could only see the front half of the car. She was sitting in the office park cut out about 100 yards south of the crossing (on the E side) giving me the evil eye (if she was camped out for speeders the pickings were slim).
February 25, 2013 at 5:03 pm #963204GuyContinental
Participant@bobco85 44606 wrote:
I don’t want to derail the conversation, but in both the situations that I have quoted, it seems that the 2 minute law (VA Code § 46.2-833) would apply, allowing each of you to cross on a red.
Not sure I’d want to test that with a LEO sitting right there. Maybe dismount and jaywalk?
Regardless, I agree with Mr. Stone, Gallows is the other signaled WO&D intersection where there are large gaps of traffic and very long light intervals, at least in the AM (pm notsomuch)
February 25, 2013 at 5:14 pm #963208baiskeli
Participant@GuyContinental 44609 wrote:
Not sure I’d want to test that with a LEO sitting right there. Maybe dismount and jaywalk?
It specifically mentions bicycles, along with motorcycles (which aren’t expected to dismount), so I’d say it’s legal to ride through without dismounting.
But I don’t want to test it in front of a cop either, let alone the cop’s knowledge of the law in the first place.
February 25, 2013 at 5:18 pm #963209dasgeh
Participant@mstone 44601 wrote:
We need a “pedestrian level of service” where intersections fail if pedestrians have to wait several minutes at empty intersections. W&OD at gallows is the same way–really short walk signal, then it will refuse to give pedestrians a signal again for several minutes. The funny thing is, you usually have to stand at an empty street for a while, then cars come just before they finally get a red.
There are a bunch of intersections near the Lincoln that would fail this too — the lights aren’t timed together, so pedestrians have red when there are no cars, or no way cars could go far, but then pedestrians get green when cars could be continuing. Backs up traffic and frustrates pedestrians.
February 25, 2013 at 5:37 pm #963217mstone
Participant@bobco85 44606 wrote:
I don’t want to derail the conversation, but in both the situations that I have quoted, it seems that the 2 minute law (VA Code § 46.2-833) would apply, allowing each of you to cross on a red.
I think that only applies to road signals, not pedestrian signals. (Because who cares how long pedestrians wait if the alternative might make a car slow down.)
February 25, 2013 at 5:41 pm #963220ShawnoftheDread
Participant@mstone 44623 wrote:
I think that only applies to road signals, not pedestrian signals. (Because who cares how long pedestrians wait if the alternative might make a car slow down.)
I’d read it that way too, especially considering it’s meant to address the inability of motorcycles and bikes to trip the light. That’s not the case with a pedestrian signal.
February 25, 2013 at 6:11 pm #963229DaveK
ParticipantNope.
Quote:…if a driver of a motorcycle or moped or a bicycle rider approaches an intersection that is controlled by a traffic light…That includes any signal in my mind. They should have written traffic signal instead of traffic light, but I’m having a hard time figuring out where that would be a problem. In any case, if I roll up to a pedestrian signal to cross, say, Gallows Road, and I have to wait 2 minutes, I’ll run it right in front of a cop and take it to court. This is another law I need to laminate and keep in my seat bag…
February 25, 2013 at 6:21 pm #963234GuyContinental
Participant@DaveK 44636 wrote:
Nope.
That includes any signal in my mind. They should have written traffic signal instead of traffic light, but I’m having a hard time figuring out where that would be a problem. In any case, if I roll up to a pedestrian signal to cross, say, Gallows Road, and I have to wait 2 minutes, I’ll run it right in front of a cop and take it to court. This is another law I need to laminate and keep in my seat bag…
I was going to ask if anyone had a laminated list of laws and what they might be… of course there is a time place and attitude to pull that off… maybe helmet camera to boot.
February 25, 2013 at 6:42 pm #963238mstone
Participant@DaveK 44636 wrote:
Nope.
That includes any signal in my mind. They should have written traffic signal instead of traffic light, but I’m having a hard time figuring out where that would be a problem. In any case, if I roll up to a pedestrian signal to cross, say, Gallows Road, and I have to wait 2 minutes, I’ll run it right in front of a cop and take it to court. This is another law I need to laminate and keep in my seat bag…
So in your mind it is intended to cover pedestrian walk signals, but they just forgot to mention pedestrians? In context, it is intended to apply to sensor-actuated lights which often never change for anything other than a car. You might have a valid argument for a broken push-to-walk signal, but this provision was never meant to just be a “I don’t want to wait for the signal” exemption.
February 25, 2013 at 6:49 pm #963239ShawnoftheDread
Participant@DaveK 44636 wrote:
Nope.
That includes any signal in my mind. They should have written traffic signal instead of traffic light, but I’m having a hard time figuring out where that would be a problem….
…the driver or rider may proceed through the intersection on a steady red light…
The statute doesn’t mention a pedestrian signal at all. If you’re using a crosswalk without waiting for a walk signal, you’re not crossing “on a steady red light.”
In any case, if I roll up to a pedestrian signal to cross, say, Gallows Road, and I have to wait 2 minutes, I’ll run it right in front of a cop and take it to court. This is another law I need to laminate and keep in my seat bag…
I wish you luck. Let us know how it goes.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.