Virginia anti-mask law is still on the books
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › Virginia anti-mask law is still on the books
- This topic has 9 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
Terpfan.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 7, 2014 at 11:12 pm #990458
DismalScientist
ParticipantWhat do you expect from Southerners? I hear they cancel school when it gets too “cold,” even when the temperature is above zero!
January 7, 2014 at 11:28 pm #990460rcannon100
ParticipantDang, halloween and mardi gras must suck in Virginia.
(any enforcement would probably be so rife with civil rights problems I am not sure I would worry)
((If you are really concerned, just right “Winter Sucks” across your mask and then it is a first amendment issue))
January 7, 2014 at 11:32 pm #990462Arlingtonrider
ParticipantYes, I think we had this discussion last year or maybe the year before that. Thanks for mentioning that perhaps the law could be modified, but I doubt that anyone will want to re-open it and risk having the inability to enforce it where it should be enforced. Unless there is a real problem, aside from that one individual who stopped the VBF board member, I’m not overly concerned about it. I think good safety/health arguments could be made to challenge any enforcement efforts against cyclists, skiers, etc.
January 8, 2014 at 6:26 am #990492mattotoole
ParticipantQuote:((If you are really concerned, just right “Winter Sucks” across your mask and then it is a first amendment issue))Best idea yet! Sadly, no bill to get behind this year.
January 8, 2014 at 8:17 am #990493Fast Friendly Guy
Participant@PotomacCyclist 73964 wrote:
ยง 18.2-422. Prohibition of wearing of masks in certain places; exceptions.
It shall be unlawful for any person over sixteen years of age while wearing any mask, hood or other device whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered so as to conceal the identity of the wearer……However, the provisions of this section shall not apply to persons …. (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment or other activities and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons;
Lucky thing Trish N lives in MD. (seen her Strava photo lately?) I think we’re okay based on (ii), however, I intend to do my part by almost never robbing either a bank or a 7-11 while riding my bike on a really cold day. I ask all my fellow riders to join me in setting this good example. Note: if you do feel compelled to do a hold-up, please, for all of us, leave your bike at home. Dave
January 8, 2014 at 11:56 am #990495Rod Smith
ParticipantI briefly acquired a bit of notoriety when the bicycle riding bank robber was discovered to be a contractor with Quick Messenger Service named Rod (it was the other Rod, not me).
January 8, 2014 at 12:50 pm #990496Brent
Participant@PotomacCyclist 73964 wrote:
(ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment or other activities and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons;
I am not a lawyer, but I’m pretty sure this puts cyclists in a safe position. Protecting your face from the cold is definitely a physical safety issue.
Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk
January 8, 2014 at 1:55 pm #990499Amalitza
Guest@Rod Smith 74003 wrote:
(it was the other Rod, not me).
So you say…
January 8, 2014 at 3:11 pm #990509Terpfan
ParticipantKind of surprising they still haven’t changed it given the broad range of folks it would encompass from cyclists to skiers, hunters, teenagers playing paintball, Halloween, etc. Or at least change the designation from felony to misdemeanor. I wonder what stopped the change before? My guess is prosecutors probably argued for it claiming they only use it judiciously (heard that argument about small scale poker games several times from similar organizations in another life/career).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.