Travel Bike Wishlist
Our Community › Forums › Bikes & Equipment › Travel Bike Wishlist
- This topic has 48 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by
KayakCyndi.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 3, 2016 at 4:41 am #1061184
hozn
ParticipantIn an online thread I found this quote that I think would rule out the Breakaway design: “Note that the larger Ritchey bikes require an oversized 26x29x10 case instead of the 26x26x10 case that s&s uses.”
That makes some sense thinking about top tube length and fork angle. So if I go the coupler route, I guess I would want two couplers to ensure this fits in the non-oversize case.
December 3, 2016 at 12:18 pm #1061186ginacico
Participant@mstone 149762 wrote:
FWIW, I’ve heard from a few people that the S&S couplers are a PITA, and not worth doing unless you fly a lot and also can’t live without a perfectly fitted full size bike.
I would disagree. The couplers themselves are a marvel of engineering, solid and easy to use. Travel bikes can also be taken on trains as carry-on luggage (Amtrak roll-on service is still quite fickle), which opens up a lot of territory. Flying adds a certain PITA factor, but may be worth it in some scenarios.
Perhaps the best info on travel bikes is from S&S themselves. They list a bunch of manufacturers who make travel bikes, and offer lots of info on packing and maintenance.
As you’ve discovered, Bilenky is the only framebuilder who will retrofit a steel or titanium frame with S&S couplers, and they’re somewhat local (PA). They claim to have done tens of thousands; I’ve talked to other builders who were afraid to try it, so their vast experience is a good thing. Bilenky’s basic package price for a retrofit includes a coupler wrench (also called spanner wrench), and you can add a paint job for additional cost and/or a 26x26x10 case. Only caution is to have patience, they’re often backed up and rumor is Stephen Bilenky would sometimes rather go ride his bike than be at work (wouldn’t we all!).
Co-Motion (in Oregon) is the other company I’m familiar with that makes both stock and custom travel bikes. They are high quality and not cheap. My friend Peter now has two of them, a single and tandem, both acquired used on eBay. We refer to Co-Motion’s videos on how to pack when we need a reminder.
My bike is an out-of-the-box Salsa Vaya Travel. The frame is bare stainless steel, so I don’t have to worry about rust or paint scratches. I find it easy to break down, the process takes about an hour. As dkel pointed out, Salsa discontinued making the Travel version of this bike, but they may be a few floating around in the marketplace. It’s essentially a gravel bike with all the attachment points for touring, capacity for fat tires, and mechanical (Avid BB7) disk brakes. I bought it because it’s exactly the bike I wanted, and it happened to have couplers; the geometry works out perfectly for me (YMMV).
Cable couplers aren’t going to be compatible with hydraulic lines, but mechanical disk brakes are totally manageable. Peter’s bikes both have caliper brakes. Simple, field-repairable systems work best for obvious reasons.
@mstone 149776 wrote:
You’ll be putting a bike together in the hotel room, it’s gonna be a focus.
Yes, indeed. I’d be happy to host a show-n-tell of my Vaya, even (depending on how much time you want to spend) demonstrate the packing process and tricks I’ve learned to hozn or anyone else who’s interested.
If solving the equation proved that a travel bike wasn’t worth the effort, I’d probably consider a folding bike of some flavor.
December 3, 2016 at 2:47 pm #1061189hozn
Participant@ginacico 149786 wrote:
I would disagree. The couplers themselves are a marvel of engineering, solid and easy to use. Travel bikes can also be taken on trains as carry-on luggage (Amtrak roll-on service is still quite fickle), which opens up a lot of territory. Flying adds a certain PITA factor, but may be worth it in some scenarios.
(Thanks so much for the detailed reply!)
Yeah, the appeal of a breakable bike, in addition to making airline travel practical, would be packing it in trunk of rental cars. While I don’t have any immediate plans to do the train here, train in Europe could be useful too (my limited impression is that there’s good roll-on support for the local trains, but not for the long-distance trains).
A few questions about your disc-brake setup / packing with disc brakes:
– Do you have to remove the rotors from your wheels to get it to fit in 26x26x10?
– Do you think it would be sufficient to just have brake cables (or, heck, hoses) attached with zip-tie/c-clips to exterior of frame for packing, or would you actually need to separate the cable in some way? (Hard to imagine whether the cables still attached to the caliper and levers could just be coiled up next to the broken down pieces or if that would be a lot less convenient than having the tables separate.) I’ve also heard some people say they just unbolt the calipers, but I think that also crosses the line on ease of re-assembly.
– Same question for rear derailleur, I guess. Could I just run full length housing on toptube and down seatstay attached with c-clips and then coil up the cable rather than separate it?
– In this more gravel/cx/touring paradigm, I would not have a front derailleur, so at least that part would be simpler.
– Have you done anything with tubeless tires? I assume big-volume (30+mm?) tires have to be deflated to fit, which means emptying sealant from tubeless. That sounds like a pain in the butt since I’d also need a HV pump. So maybe tubeless isn’t worth the benefit for that setup.I don’t have any plans to do any long touring/bikepacking trips at this stage in my life, but having a bike that would be comfortable off-road could be a plus. The more I think about it, the more it seems like the economical approach would be to replace my cx/commuter frame with a coupled frame. That would only make sense, though, if I could go hydro disc on the coupled frame (since that is what is on my cx/commuter is).
December 3, 2016 at 4:13 pm #1061191mstone
Participant@ginacico 149786 wrote:
I would disagree. The couplers themselves are a marvel of engineering, solid and easy to use.[/quote]
Yeah, it’s not the coupler unscrewing that I think was the PITA part…
Quote:I find it easy to break down, the process takes about an hour.…it’s this. And, in an hour, you can break a regular bike down to fit in a box. So as I said before, you’re basically golden if the difference in size between a regular box and a checked luggage box is really, really significant for you. Given my feelings about modern air travel, I’d much rather ship the bike through than sit around an airport, but everyone’s different. It’s definitely not a spur of the moment “I think I’ll throw the bike in the car” kind of serendipity–if that’s what you’re looking for, get a folder.
December 3, 2016 at 4:37 pm #1061192ginacico
Participant@hozn 149789 wrote:
(Thanks so much for the detailed reply!)
Happy to do so. 😎 Don’t hesitate to ping me for a show-n-tell either.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
Yeah, the appeal of a breakable bike, in addition to making airline travel practical, would be packing it in trunk of rental cars.
That’s the spirit! One of my cars is an ’02 Honda Insight, a tiny little 2-seater with a hatchback, and I can actually fit Vaya in the back of it simply by unscrewing the couplers. Don’t even have to remove the wheels. Vaya has the capability to go wherever I go.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
While I don’t have any immediate plans to do the train here, train in Europe could be useful too (my limited impression is that there’s good roll-on support for the local trains, but not for the long-distance trains).
Good thought. Most regional trains in Europe have excellent roll-on service, but the long-distance routes and high-speed trains do not. On our last tour in Europe, the equation worked out such that we rented bikes in Germany, and we used trains as our one-way shuttle. But that was before we had travel bikes.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
A few questions about your disc-brake setup / packing with disc brakes:
– Do you have to remove the rotors from your wheels to get it to fit in 26x26x10?
I do remove the rotors. They are center lock, so they just unscrew (with a tool), super easy.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
– Do you think it would be sufficient to just have brake cables (or, heck, hoses) attached with zip-tie/c-clips to exterior of frame for packing, or would you actually need to separate the cable in some way? (Hard to imagine whether the cables still attached to the caliper and levers could just be coiled up next to the broken down pieces or if that would be a lot less convenient than having the tables separate.) I’ve also heard some people say they just unbolt the calipers, but I think that also crosses the line on ease of re-assembly.
You’ll definitely want to free the cable somehow, so it doesn’t get kinked when you go to pack the frame pieces. In my case the two derailleur cables have couplers installed. However, my rear brake cable is sheathed and incompatible with couplers, so I free it up by actually unbolting the brake caliper and cutting the zip-ties holding it to the frame. I’m skeptical you could do that with hydraulic brakes, but I imagine it’s possible if there’s no risk of the fluid leaking.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
– Same question for rear derailleur, I guess. Could I just run full length housing on toptube and down seatstay attached with c-clips and then coil up the cable rather than separate it?
Again, I think you’ll want to separate the cable somehow. As soon as you de-couple the frame, that cable is going to seem too tight, get in your way and limit your ability to arrange the pieces into the box. I also unbolt the rear-D from the frame because I find the pieces nest better that way. I remove the chain with a quick link, store it in a ziplock, and re-thread it again. In general, the more pieces I remove, the easier it is to pack and the safer it will travel. The line of “must do” is pretty blurry at this point.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
– In this more gravel/cx/touring paradigm, I would not have a front derailleur, so at least that part would be simpler.
True!
Let me say this…. Before I tried it, I mentally resisted each potentially unnecessary step. I thought there’s no way I’d remove a derailleur, or a brake caliper, or whatever, if I don’t have to. And guess what, now I gleefully deconstruct my bike into a million pieces, and I’m happy that within an hour of arrival I’m back on MY bike again. I’m no mechanic for sure, but I know how Vaya works, and after a few trips I’m very comfortable with the whole process. It’s only one bike, and every part on it has been demystified. Knowing how handy you are building bikes, there is quite simply NO task that would be a barrier for you. Hotel rooms can be pretty dreary, but reassembling a bike sure beats watching bad cable TV.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
– Have you done anything with tubeless tires? I assume big-volume (30+mm?) tires have to be deflated to fit, which means emptying sealant from tubeless. That sounds like a pain in the butt since I’d also need a HV pump. So maybe tubeless isn’t worth the benefit for that setup.
No, I run standard tubes with “flatless” tires, and they do get deflated for packing. Tubeless would be a PITA for travel. Simple, field-repairable systems.
@hozn 149789 wrote:
I don’t have any plans to do any long touring/bikepacking trips at this stage in my life, but having a bike that would be comfortable off-road could be a plus. The more I think about it, the more it seems like the economical approach would be to replace my cx/commuter frame with a coupled frame. That would only make sense, though, if I could go hydro disc on the coupled frame (since that is what is on my cx/commuter is).
Is your cx/commuter bike steel? Heck, contact Bilenky and see if they’ll cut it in half for you. If it’s the bike you want to be riding anyway, coupling it to take with you might just be an economical answer.
December 3, 2016 at 4:49 pm #1061193ginacico
Participant@mstone 149791 wrote:
…it’s this. And, in an hour, you can break a regular bike down to fit in a box. So as I said before, you’re basically golden if the difference in size between a regular box and a checked luggage box is really, really significant for you. Given my feelings about modern air travel, I’d much rather ship the bike through than sit around an airport, but everyone’s different. It’s definitely not a spur of the moment “I think I’ll throw the bike in the car” kind of serendipity–if that’s what you’re looking for, get a folder.
There’s a lot to be said for folding bikes. In fact, this conversation had Peter and I browsing around last night and talking about them. Some can be custom fit and have decent travel cases. A whole world I haven’t explored much.
We have little experience flying with our travel bikes, for sure we’ve used them a lot more on trains and in cars. The serendipity of those scenarios hasn’t worn off yet. I was as skeptical or worse before I got one, and now I’m always looking for more ways to use it.
December 3, 2016 at 7:53 pm #1061195hozn
Participant@ginacico 149792 wrote:
Is your cx/commuter bike steel? Heck, contact Bilenky and see if they’ll cut it in half for you. If it’s the bike you want to be riding anyway, coupling it to take with you might just be an economical answer.
It Is titanium, but unfortunately my commuter has an ovalized top tube, so I suspect it wouldn’t work. Also, I have drilled-out cable stops which would need to be changed to zip-tie stops. You’re probably right though that drawing the line at removing a caliper is a bit silly. Especially with hydro brakes putting that back on is a pretty quick job. I will do some more cost research on replacing my commuter as identically as possible with a coupler frame. Then I’d sell my current frame to offset the new frame cost. Have to see how the math works out there.
Thanks again for all the feedback; very helpful!
December 5, 2016 at 4:00 pm #1061259ginacico
Participant@hozn 149795 wrote:
It Is titanium, but unfortunately my commuter has an ovalized top tube, so I suspect it wouldn’t work. Also, I have drilled-out cable stops which would need to be changed to zip-tie stops.
It still might be an option. “We can install couplers in almost any bike, even if the tubes are non-round or tapered. However, there is an upcharge for oversized as well as irregular tubes.” Brazing on a few cable guides shouldn’t be a big deal, and if it doesn’t need a paint job you’d save that cost.
Working up the nerve to have someone chop your bike in half is another matter entirely
Beyond that, keeping a close eye on eBay and bike forums for a travel frame is probably the best bet.
December 5, 2016 at 4:59 pm #1061271hozn
Participant@ginacico 149870 wrote:
It still might be an option. “We can install couplers in almost any bike, even if the tubes are non-round or tapered. However, there is an upcharge for oversized as well as irregular tubes.” Brazing on a few cable guides shouldn’t be a big deal, and if it doesn’t need a paint job you’d save that cost.
Working up the nerve to have someone chop your bike in half is another matter entirely
Beyond that, keeping a close eye on eBay and bike forums for a travel frame is probably the best bet.
Ha, I guess I should have investigated before just assuming it wouldn’t work
— But really, I think the cheaper option would still be getting a second ti frame. And I would pay some number of hundreds of dollars not to be without my bike for the time it would take to get that turned around. (For commuting I don’t have a good backup, since the trailer hitch doesn’t work on my road bike’s breezer-style dropouts).
I’ve setup some ebay watches, so we’ll see what turns up.
I think I have resolved, though, that the right solution here is to replace my commuter frame rather than try to N+1. I have no room for an assembled N+1, which means it’d stay in the case until I needed it, which sounds like a waste. My commuter is versatile enough for road or gravel or singletrack, so that seems like the perfect choice to be also collapsible. If the net cost of upgrading to collapsible is somewhere south of $800, it sounds like it’s worth considering. I’ve been delaying rebuilding my rear wheels for 11sp, but I will choose centerlock hubs when I do; my front hubs are already centerlock on that bike.
Thanks again to everyone for the input. I’ll update with what I end up doing. Probably nothing until next year unless a too-good deal comes up on ebay.
December 5, 2016 at 6:21 pm #1061281peterw_diy
Participant@hozn 149878 wrote:
For commuting I don’t have a good backup, since the trailer hitch doesn’t work on my road bike’s breezer-style dropouts
Isn’t that a $20 problem?
https://www.bikeshophub.com/trailers/burley-alternative-hitch-adapter-p-2660.html
December 5, 2016 at 6:36 pm #1061283hozn
Participant@peterw_diy 149888 wrote:
Isn’t that a $20 problem?
https://www.bikeshophub.com/trailers/burley-alternative-hitch-adapter-p-2660.html
Maybe if I had a quick release! I would need that for 12mm thru-axle. I don’t think this exists, but I’d be happy to be wrong.
December 5, 2016 at 8:53 pm #1061292peterw_diy
Participant@hozn 149890 wrote:
Maybe if I had a quick release! I would need that for 12mm thru-axle. I don’t think this exists, but I’d be happy to be wrong.
… paging vicegrip, I think we have a project for you…
December 6, 2016 at 12:24 am #1061302hozn
Participant@peterw_diy 149903 wrote:
… paging vicegrip, I think we have a project for you…
No, no, I really don’t need my road bike to tow the trailer. After all, the retrofit option is still more expensive than a new frame.
February 17, 2017 at 1:51 pm #1066299vvill
ParticipantAnyone familiar with or used either of these before? They’re both “custom” made bags for bikes that require a bit more assembly – fork removal (and probably won’t fit larger frames, 29ers, etc.).
http://www.gavilanbff.com/
https://orucase.com/February 17, 2017 at 3:17 pm #1066304ginacico
Participant@vvill 155229 wrote:
Anyone familiar with or used either of these before? They’re both “custom” made bags for bikes that require a bit more assembly – fork removal (and probably won’t fit larger frames, 29ers, etc.).
I hadn’t seen those, specifically, but they look interesting.
Peter has the Backpack Case and I have Co-Motion’s Co-Pilot Travel Case.
Both are roughly 26x26x10, just inside the airline regulation limits. They accommodate 700c wheels (must deflate the tires) but don’t require removing the fork. Conveniently, the soft case fits inside the other one, which comes in handy when we’re traveling with two bikes or the tandem, because we can pre-ship or store them as one case.
Anecdotally, we both really appreciate that the Co-Motion case has a telescoping handle and wheels. Backpack styles work okay, but the reality of lugging around a bulky case on your back gets old pretty fast.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.