Time to join the Velominati? Embrace being Elite?

Our Community Forums General Discussion Time to join the Velominati? Embrace being Elite?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #954836
    TwoWheelsDC
    Participant

    @thecyclingeconomist 35078 wrote:

    Is this the definition of “Elite” to you all? Then refer to Rule #5… Bwhahaha.

    :p

    http://www.velominati.com/

    (Can someone link me to the original rant where the term “Elite” became forum terminology? When you search the term… it’s a bit overused to find the original that I’ve read reference to.)

    ELITE is anyone faster than me…crazy jerks!

    #954837
    Mikey
    Participant

    It’s spelled ELITE! Bush leage mistake ;)

    #954841
    jabberwocky
    Participant

    @thecyclingeconomist 35078 wrote:

    http://www.velominati.com/

    Am I the only one who finds that site profoundly annoying? Its like all the snobbish conformity of the roadie world condensed into one web page.

    #954859
    vvill
    Participant

    Not quite profoundly annoying, but I do usually make sure my sunglasses are UNDER my helmet straps. I like to take off my helmet while being able to keep my sunglasses on. I also don’t usually remove my valve nut/cap on my tubes. I’ve read the rules before but a lot of them don’t match my riding priorities, e.g. I wear MTB gear on commutes on my road bike all the time.

    #954861
    eminva
    Participant

    Here is the original thread:

    http://bikearlingtonforum.com/showthread.php?2684-Dear-ELITE-biker

    As for the Rules, I feel my strict adherence to Rule #9 exempts me from having to pay attention to any of the other rules.

    Liz

    #954862
    Certifried
    Participant

    That site is entirely satirical. Mostly. Some of “The Rules” do seem to be a sad acceptance of ELITEism with a warm embrace. After all, if you can’t laugh at yourself…. http://www.velominati.com/the-rules/#5

    #954863
    baiskeli
    Participant

    This is why we have a Forum Dictionary.

    ELITE (N to the proper): An obtuse ninja, existing in an alternate time-space dimension, indifferent to the peons who dare tread on the same ground.

    #954864
    TwoWheelsDC
    Participant

    What I find interesting is that some of the ridiculous rules are written like they are meant to be tongue-in-cheek, but I’m pretty sure they are completely serious…and now I constantly stress about my sock height. Dammit!

    #954866
    KelOnWheels
    Participant

    I fail at rule #56. I must have milk. :)

    Also I feel that rule #57 does not apply to beater bikes, which should be enstickered.

    I do tell myself to Rule 5 from time to time :D

    #954875
    ShawnoftheDread
    Participant

    I think it’s both annoying and hilarious. I break all the rules except 5, 9, 40, and 47. Okay, sometimes I break 5.

    #954890
    Certifried
    Participant

    If you’re not blasting this song as you drive the herd of hipsters down your local path, you’re not doing it right.

    #954892
    rcannon100
    Participant

    All good colloquialisms (ie “ELITE rider) come from rants!

    Have seen this before. Makes you realize how different the different bike cultures are. We need a set of rules for bike commuters. Something like

    • If your Kit and your equipment matches, you’re not a commuter.
    • If some part of your bike is not held together by duck tape, you are not a commuter.
    • Nobody cares what you wear; save the racing spandex for the race
    • Rule #9 still applies
    • Rule #43 still applies
    • It’s not about speed; its about safety
    #954902
    OneEighth
    Participant

    #50 non-compliant.

    #954909
    KelOnWheels
    Participant

    @rcannon100 35140 wrote:

    If some part of your bike is not held together by duck tape, you are not a commuter.

    Sweet! I’m a commuter!

    #954922
    PeteD
    Participant

    I do enjoy reading the site, as they do at least have a fine appreciation for cycle racing, specifically the 80’s era. I do agree most of it is tongue-in-cheek, and there’s no way anyone could seriously adhere to all 91 rules.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.