Time to join the Velominati? Embrace being Elite?
Our Community › Forums › General Discussion › Time to join the Velominati? Embrace being Elite?
- This topic has 17 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by
JorgeGortex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 5, 2012 at 2:50 pm #954836
TwoWheelsDC
Participant@thecyclingeconomist 35078 wrote:
Is this the definition of “Elite” to you all? Then refer to Rule #5… Bwhahaha.
:p
(Can someone link me to the original rant where the term “Elite” became forum terminology? When you search the term… it’s a bit overused to find the original that I’ve read reference to.)
ELITE is anyone faster than me…crazy jerks!
November 5, 2012 at 2:50 pm #954837Mikey
ParticipantIt’s spelled ELITE! Bush leage mistake
November 5, 2012 at 2:58 pm #954841jabberwocky
Participant@thecyclingeconomist 35078 wrote:
Am I the only one who finds that site profoundly annoying? Its like all the snobbish conformity of the roadie world condensed into one web page.
November 5, 2012 at 3:47 pm #954859vvill
ParticipantNot quite profoundly annoying, but I do usually make sure my sunglasses are UNDER my helmet straps. I like to take off my helmet while being able to keep my sunglasses on. I also don’t usually remove my valve nut/cap on my tubes. I’ve read the rules before but a lot of them don’t match my riding priorities, e.g. I wear MTB gear on commutes on my road bike all the time.
November 5, 2012 at 3:56 pm #954861eminva
ParticipantHere is the original thread:
http://bikearlingtonforum.com/showthread.php?2684-Dear-ELITE-biker
As for the Rules, I feel my strict adherence to Rule #9 exempts me from having to pay attention to any of the other rules.
Liz
November 5, 2012 at 3:58 pm #954862Certifried
ParticipantThat site is entirely satirical. Mostly. Some of “The Rules” do seem to be a sad acceptance of ELITEism with a warm embrace. After all, if you can’t laugh at yourself…. http://www.velominati.com/the-rules/#5
November 5, 2012 at 3:59 pm #954863baiskeli
ParticipantThis is why we have a Forum Dictionary.
ELITE (N to the proper): An obtuse ninja, existing in an alternate time-space dimension, indifferent to the peons who dare tread on the same ground.
November 5, 2012 at 4:01 pm #954864TwoWheelsDC
ParticipantWhat I find interesting is that some of the ridiculous rules are written like they are meant to be tongue-in-cheek, but I’m pretty sure they are completely serious…and now I constantly stress about my sock height. Dammit!
November 5, 2012 at 4:24 pm #954866KelOnWheels
ParticipantI fail at rule #56. I must have milk.
Also I feel that rule #57 does not apply to beater bikes, which should be enstickered.
I do tell myself to Rule 5 from time to time
November 5, 2012 at 4:50 pm #954875ShawnoftheDread
ParticipantI think it’s both annoying and hilarious. I break all the rules except 5, 9, 40, and 47. Okay, sometimes I break 5.
November 5, 2012 at 5:15 pm #954890Certifried
ParticipantIf you’re not blasting this song as you drive the herd of hipsters down your local path, you’re not doing it right.
November 5, 2012 at 5:35 pm #954892rcannon100
ParticipantAll good colloquialisms (ie “ELITE rider) come from rants!
Have seen this before. Makes you realize how different the different bike cultures are. We need a set of rules for bike commuters. Something like
- If your Kit and your equipment matches, you’re not a commuter.
- If some part of your bike is not held together by duck tape, you are not a commuter.
- Nobody cares what you wear; save the racing spandex for the race
- Rule #9 still applies
- Rule #43 still applies
- It’s not about speed; its about safety
November 5, 2012 at 7:06 pm #954902OneEighth
Participant#50 non-compliant.
November 5, 2012 at 7:52 pm #954909KelOnWheels
Participant@rcannon100 35140 wrote:
If some part of your bike is not held together by duck tape, you are not a commuter.
Sweet! I’m a commuter!
November 5, 2012 at 9:43 pm #954922PeteD
ParticipantI do enjoy reading the site, as they do at least have a fine appreciation for cycle racing, specifically the 80’s era. I do agree most of it is tongue-in-cheek, and there’s no way anyone could seriously adhere to all 91 rules.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.