Smog => lung damage
Our Community › Forums › Commuters › Smog => lung damage
- This topic has 37 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 11 months ago by
Greenbelt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 20, 2011 at 3:19 pm #928307
WillStewart
Participant@Brendan von Buckingham 6017 wrote:
There’s all sorts of things in urban air. Professionally I work with historic architecture and old buildings. Went to a seminar on historic masonry. When they clean masonry buildings of decades worth of grime, guess what the number one contaminant is. Rubber. Rubber from millions of tires slowly wearing away, every day.
Good point, Brendan.
“Particulate Matter, or PM-2.5, refers to tiny particles that are smaller than 2.5 microns (smaller than the width of a human hair). Particulate matter has several sources including dirt kicked up into the air on paved and unpaved roads, tires and brake linings as they wear down, smoke, vehicle tailpipe emissions, and earth moving activities. Because particulate matter is so very tiny, it easily bypasses your lung’s protective systems.”
http://www.tmacog.org/airqualityfacts.htm
Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 CEQA Significance Thresholds
“Particles in the PM2.5 size range are able to travel deeply into the respiratory tract, reaching the lungs. Exposure to fine particles can cause short-term health effects such as eye, nose, throat and lung irritation, coughing, sneezing, runny nose and shortness of breath. Exposure to fine particles can also affect lung function and worsen medical conditions such as asthma and heart disease. Scientific studies have linked increases in daily PM2.5 exposure with increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospital admissions, emergency department visits and deaths. Studies also suggest that long term exposure to fine particulate matter may be associated with increased rates of chronic bronchitis, reduced lung function and increased mortality from lung cancer and heart disease.”
http://www.health.state.ny.us/environmental/indoors/air/pmq_a.htm
Wearing an effective mask while bike commuting significant distances on high pollution days is looking more and more appropriate.
July 21, 2011 at 2:47 pm #928394baiskeli
Participant@WillStewart 6056 wrote:
Wearing an effective mask while bike commuting significant distances on high pollution days is looking more and more appropriate.
That brings up another question – aren’t most days going to be bad for particulates? The heat probably doesn’t affect them like it does ozone. I would think that unless it’s raining or just rained, most days would have particulates floating around.
July 21, 2011 at 4:17 pm #928402DaveK
ParticipantToday’s heat – brain damage. If you catch someone riding around singing Winter Wonderland that’ll be me.
July 21, 2011 at 4:23 pm #928404WillStewart
Participant@baiskeli 6145 wrote:
That brings up another question – aren’t most days going to be bad for particulates? The heat probably doesn’t affect them like it does ozone. I would think that unless it’s raining or just rained, most days would have particulates floating around.
Good question. If you look at the daily data over the year, it seems that PM 2.5 pollution correlates to temperature, at least weakly;
http://air.mwcog.org/index.cfm?selYear=2011&selMonth=1Make sure Particulate Matter is selected and keep hitting “Next Month” to see how it progresses through this year (to date).
July 21, 2011 at 4:40 pm #928407Dirt
Participant@DaveK 6153 wrote:
Today’s heat – brain damage. If you catch someone riding around singing Winter Wonderland that’ll be me.
I used Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer this morning. I felt very comfy and cool in my own personal dream world.
July 21, 2011 at 5:01 pm #928410ronwalf
Participant@WillStewart 6155 wrote:
Good question. If you look at the daily data over the year, it seems that PM 2.5 pollution correlates to temperature, at least weakly;
Look at February 19th, 2011. It seems particulate matter has a strong correlation with major fires :0
http://www.mde.state.md.us/programs/Air/AirQualityMonitoring/Documents/EEPetition_20110219_Final.pdf
(skip the boring text, just look at the pictures)July 23, 2011 at 10:42 pm #928542Greenbelt
ParticipantI’m just now going through all the great air quality links on this thread — thanks everyone.
If it wasn’t mentioned before, this is the one I’ve been using. I like the animation tab thingy: http://www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action=airnow.local_city&cityid=268
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.