Registration for Freezing Saddles 2016 is now open!

[Steve O]

@cvcalhoun 129149 wrote:

… But I can take it out.

I’m torn between veracity and notoriety.

Maybe just change “weird” to “ingenius.”

[dkel]

@Steve O 129157 wrote:

I’m torn between veracity and notoriety.

Maybe just change “weird” to “ingenius.”

Is this the wrong time to point out that you misspelled ingenious?

[ShawnoftheDread]

@dkel 129160 wrote:

Is this the wrong time to point out that you misspelled ingenious?

[dkel]

Oh, I can definitely die in peace now!

[Vicegrip]

@Steve O 129157 wrote:

I’m torn between veracity and notoriety.

Maybe just change “weird” to “ingenius.”

@dkel 129160 wrote:

Is this the wrong time to point out that you misspelled ingenious?

Oh-my-Dog. I almost spat my afternoon coffee.

[cvcalhoun]

So let’s see, as to the pros and cons of leaving this the way it is:

Pros:

• Avoiding extra work.
• Ability to twit Steve O.
• Perhaps next year, people will pay attention when I request several times that they review the form before it goes final.

Con:

• Increased veracity.

Yeah, I’m not seeing a lot of benefits to changing it!

@Steve O 129137 wrote:

Hey I just signed up and saw this:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10198[/ATTACH]

First, whatever systems I may come up with, they are not weird; they are genius. Second, it’s not actually true. Although I have proposed systems in the past, I have consistently been ignored in the end.

[Steve O]

@dkel 129160 wrote:

Is this the wrong time to point out that you misspelled ingenious?

It’s called irony

[consularrider]

@cvcalhoun 129184 wrote:

So let’s see, as to the pros and cons of leaving this the way it is:

Pros:

…
• … twit Steve O.
  …

Con:

• Increased veracity.

Yeah, I’m not seeing a lot of benefits to changing it!

As well as being weird?

[Vicegrip]

@Steve O 129195 wrote:

It’s called iorny

fxd?

[Boomer Cycles]

@Steve O 129137 wrote:

Hey I just signed up and saw this:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10198[/ATTACH]

First, whatever systems I may come up with, they are not weird; they are genius. Second, it’s not actually true. Although I have proposed systems in the past, I have consistently been ignored in the end.

…and obtuse, opaque and idiosyncratic [emoji12]

[Raymo853]

Is it ok for those of us not joining the competition to join the Strava group? Plan to to Strava-stalk the proceedings.

[Anonymous]

@Raymo853 129262 wrote:

Is it ok for those of us not joining the competition to join the Strava group? Plan to to Strava-stalk the proceedings.

@Arlingtonrider 128951 wrote:

… slackers … limited to two or three time alumni or those who have made significant volunteer contributions…

Pretty sure you qualify. I won’t kick you off. (regardless of whether someone actually makes a slacker group that you can join).

…now SteveO you might need to worry about…

[cyclingfool]

So… first off. Hello everyone. I haven’t been on the forums in ages. My apologies. I trust you enjoyed my absence.

Secondly, and more importantly, I am trying to sign up for FS16. The registration form won’t accept my Strava number (83324), which is only five digits long. The form keeps insisting my Strava number have 6 digits (“at least 111111”). I tried adding a leading 0 so that the number was six digits long, but it still won’t take it. Suggestions???

[cvcalhoun]

Sorry, I didn’t know there were numbers that low. I’ve fixed it now. Can you please try again?
@cyclingfool 129313 wrote:

So… first off. Hello everyone. I haven’t been on the forums in ages. My apologies. I trust you enjoyed my absence.

Secondly, and more importantly, I am trying to sign up for FS16. The registration form won’t accept my Strava number (83324), which is only five digits long. The form keeps insisting my Strava number have 6 digits (“at least 111111”). I tried adding a leading 0 so that the number was six digits long, but it still won’t take it. Suggestions???

[hozn]

Yes, Strava numbers presumably start at 1. It is just an incrementing sequence so far as I can tell.

[Author]

Posts