Use supports widening here too. Heavy mixed use. There are some spots where widening would be a bit more difficult given the surrounding geography.
I rode from the Columbia Pike to Bikenetic today and had the opportunity to think about the trail in terms of widening. There are desire paths along the majority of the section. It’s common to see runners running alongside the trail instead of on it. There are some portions of this section that flat and at the same grade. There are a few sections where one or both sides of the trail drops off into 4MR and I imagine might require some extensive work to bring to the same grade as the trail.
Unfortunately runners hate running on concrete. They claim it is “harder” than asphalt which is often why they gravitate to the W&OD and bike lanes over sidewalks.
Unfortunately runners hate running on concrete. They claim it is “harder” than asphalt which is often why they gravitate to the W&OD and bike lanes over sidewalks.
Unfortunately runners hate running on concrete. They claim it is “harder” than asphalt which is often why they gravitate to the W&OD and bike lanes over sidewalks.
Concrete is harder than asphalt, but human weight isn’t significant enough to really put into play the fact that concrete compresses much less than asphalt.
Concrete is harder than asphalt, but human weight isn’t significant enough to really put into play the fact that concrete compresses much less than asphalt.
I thought the desire paths next to the trail were because runners (and some walkers, including me) didn’t want to be on either concrete or asphalt. Neither are great for the body. Although after lots of sun and no rain, I am not sure the ground around here is much softer.