New to road bikes and wondering between two

Our Community Forums Bikes & Equipment New to road bikes and wondering between two

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #935994
    DaveK
    Participant

    @DismalScientist 14576 wrote:

    I think road bike these days only means it is not a mountain bike (and perhaps not a hybrid or a cruiser). Certainly fixies with flat bars are considered road bikes by many. Traditional touring bikes don’t have all that skinny tires, but are likely considered road bikes. I’m not certain I understand the distinction between cross bikes and touring bikes. Perhaps it is a lack of eyelets for attaching a rack and somewhat shorter stays.

    I’d say the clearances built in for mud and gunk have something to do with it, although I’ve never examined that variable between a dedicated touring bike and a cross bike. Racy cross bikes will have shorter stays, but I find most have a little longer wheelbase and a little slacker front end geometry than your typical road bike. Both traits common to tourers as well. Eyelets can also be found on most low-mid range cross bikes since so many of us (myself included) are using them as commuters.

    Lines are blurring everywhere!

    #935998
    KLizotte
    Participant

    @DaveK 14561 wrote:

    These kinds of things help determine what you should be riding. Any kind of bike shop that doesn’t start by asking you those questions isn’t worth your time and money. The right bike makes all the difference.

    Unfortunately I’ve found salespeople in LBSs to be a real crapshoot. Sometimes you get someone who is really knowledgeable, attentive and patient; other times, you get someone who doesn’t ask any questions, isn’t very helpful, and will sell you the first thing you lay your eyes on.

    That said, it’s best to visit all of your neighborhood shops a few times each. Time consuming yes, but better than having to replace the bike a year later.

    #936001
    WillStewart
    Participant

    You might want to consider a performance recumbent as well. Bikes@Vienna have a wide variety and you would be surprised at how comfortably fast you will be able to go having great visibility at the same time.

    [IMG]http://thelazyrando.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/bbraam.jpg?w=510&h=380[/IMG] team-rans-raam-2.jpg

    #936003
    JimF22003
    Participant

    I don’t think you want a Tri-specific bike unless you intend to do triathlons (or maybe time trials.) They are purpose built for riding alone and being as aero as possible, while saving certain muscle groups for the subsequent run phase of a tri.

    You can google various comparison articles. Here’s one of the first ones I found:

    http://www.livestrong.com/article/112808-difference-between-triathlon-road/

    #936009
    dasgeh
    Participant

    @JimF22003 14587 wrote:

    I don’t think you want a Tri-specific bike unless you intend to do triathlons (or maybe time trials.) They are purpose built for riding alone and being as aero as possible, while saving certain muscle groups for the subsequent run phase of a tri.

    I believe most people also find the fit to be less comfortable than a road bike (at least until you get used to it). Again, depends a lot on what you intend to do with the bike. If you’re thinking of doing tris, great. If you’re thinking of doing tris and commuting / touring around for long rides on the weekends, you may be happier with a road bike. You can get a pretty good aero position on most road bikes.

    #936012
    KS1G
    Participant

    One more vote to make sure whatever you decide to buy fits you before buying anything. I am helping a friend buy her 1st road bike (has a hybrid and is ready to make the move up). Over several visits to different shops, she has figured out she prefers woman-specific geometry, her frame size (which varies with make), top tube length preference (10mm makes a huge difference), likes SRAM action but preferes feel Shimano brifter hoods (going to have to pick one or the other), and prefers carbon to Al/carbon mix. And narrowed it down to 2 shops and 2-3 bikes. She’d be unhappy and have wasted a lot of money if she’d gone out and bought what she initially thought she wanted, and be wondering if she’d gotten the best deal for the right bike if she bought what she saw at the 1st shop (although that is one of the bikes she’s considering, so it’d have been a good choice).

    #936013
    QuantFail
    Participant

    Well I just came back from visiting two LBSs.

    I found a Felt Z6, everything Carbon except for the Handle bar, so Frame, Fork and seatpost were Carbon. Then the next LBS had a Cavalo Calabrese, which is a bike made by Nashbar which is the same as Fuji I think, same frame the salesperson told me, was Carbon everything (Frame, Fork, Seatpost and Bar). Both of these bikes are for 1200. The Felt was a 2010 and the Cavalo was a 2011. They struck me as more bike for my buck than the others. The Cavalo had SRAM components and the Felt has 105s. So I guess it’s a toss.

    #936030
    Greenbelt
    Participant

    @DaveK 14577 wrote:

    I’d say the clearances built in for mud and gunk have something to do with it, although I’ve never examined that variable between a dedicated touring bike and a cross bike. Racy cross bikes will have shorter stays, but I find most have a little longer wheelbase and a little slacker front end geometry than your typical road bike. Both traits common to tourers as well. Eyelets can also be found on most low-mid range cross bikes since so many of us (myself included) are using them as commuters.

    Lines are blurring everywhere!

    Saw this last night: disk brake equipped cross bike with narrow-ish CX tires (more for harder track than pure mud I think). Long-distance commuter bike of the future, I think. I was drooling.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]752[/ATTACH]

    #936036
    DaveK
    Participant

    @Greenbelt 14618 wrote:

    Saw this last night: disk brake equipped cross bike with narrow-ish CX tires (more for harder track than pure mud I think). Long-distance commuter bike of the future, I think. I was drooling.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]752[/ATTACH]

    I’m currently drooling over the Raleigh Furley (SSCX with discs) I saw at Revolution – http://www.raleighusa.com/bikes/steel-road/furley-12/

    …or the sweet, sweet Kona I saw at BicycleSpace last weekend – http://www.konaworld.com/road.cfm?content=honky_inc

    #936038
    WillStewart
    Participant

    If you are shifting from “up on the bars” with your hybrid to a “down on the drops” position, you may want to consider how that might feel on your back, neck, shoulders, wrists, etc for the duration of your commute.

    #936042
    Greenbelt
    Participant

    @DaveK 14624 wrote:

    I’m currently drooling over the Raleigh Furley (SSCX with discs) I saw at Revolution – http://www.raleighusa.com/bikes/steel-road/furley-12/

    …or the sweet, sweet Kona I saw at BicycleSpace last weekend – http://www.konaworld.com/road.cfm?content=honky_inc

    I looked at the Honky Inc, but went with the Jamis BosaNova instead (a better price on the disk-equipped steel bike, although I discarded the silly stock fenders, went with bigger tires, and eventually upgraded the brakes). The Jamis just seemed to fit me perfect, and I can ride it for hours without any pressure points or discomfort. Their new cross bike is going to be a competitor though for commuters I think — I can’t wait to ride one. It’s a quite a bit lighter, but I’ll have see how comfy it is on the road.

    #936053
    dasgeh
    Participant

    @QuantFail 14597 wrote:

    Well I just came back from visiting two LBSs.

    Hope it was fun! I have a Felt (ZW25, I think) and I LOVE it. Mainly because of fit, but I commute on it everyday and have done a few tris on it. I’ve had it for 3 years. Love it.

    #936057
    CCrew
    Participant

    @WillStewart 14626 wrote:

    If you are shifting from “up on the bars” with your hybrid to a “down on the drops” position, you may want to consider how that might feel on your back, neck, shoulders, wrists, etc for the duration of your commute.

    For the most part that transition is positive, as you have much more in the way of options with drops on hand and body positioning than you do in pretty much a fixed position on a hybrid

    #936059
    WillStewart
    Participant

    @CCrew 14647 wrote:

    For the most part that transition is positive, as you have much more in the way of options with drops on hand and body positioning than you do in pretty much a fixed position on a hybrid

    True, but the hybrid position is relatively comfortable in all the areas I stated, and hands on the drops can introduce neck, back, shoulder, wrist, etc discomfort and/or pain.

    #936061
    DismalScientist
    Participant

    @WillStewart 14649 wrote:

    True, but the hybrid position is relatively comfortable in all the areas I stated, and hands on the drops can introduce neck, back, shoulder, wrist, etc discomfort and/or pain.

    Perhaps you can raise your stem or move your seat forward relative to the bars. Use gloves for wrist issues.
    Normally you don’t shift from the drops, but rather from the hoods.

    (Or from the downtube, as God intended…)

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.