@scoot 142199 wrote:
If I correctly recall the earlier presentation, Option 3 is an excellent design for all modes of travel. What were the main arguments of the opponents?
It was kind of hard to pin down, mainly why change, traffic will move slower and congest, and push cars onto neighboring streets, it is an arterial road, no major bike or pedestrian crashes in 10 years, lived here 30+ years and don’t like change, don’t have trouble crossing the street, the traffic study is wrong, and other creative but misguided arguments.
It is important to note that option 3 was strongly supported by local residents, 50+ people who live on/just off King St signed letters in support, and had support from older residents and younger ones with children. Their voices really made an impact on the board.