FSSB #4 Mid-Winter Super Team Challenge
Our Community › Forums › Freezing Saddles Winter Riding Competition › FSSB #4 Mid-Winter Super Team Challenge
- This topic has 27 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 2 months ago by
cyclingfool.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2014 at 7:55 pm #993005
Mikey
Participantjust to give you an idea of what it would look like (note – this is a draft and will be updated at midnight)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4684[/ATTACH]
February 5, 2014 at 8:00 pm #993006Mikey
Participanthere is what it may look like, I’ll work out the bugs for file size.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]4685[/ATTACH]February 5, 2014 at 9:02 pm #993011ShawnoftheDread
ParticipantI like that Super Team 2 goes out of order from the other teams. ELITE.
February 5, 2014 at 9:04 pm #993012cvcalhoun
ParticipantI’m thinking this means those poor Slackers–who joined with the expectation that they wouldn’t be expected to do much of anything–are suddenly going to be under pressure from the #1 team to up their game.
February 5, 2014 at 9:08 pm #993013Mikey
Participant@ Dread – matchups were designed for competitiveness
@ cvcalhoun – No, I fully expect the Chris and Chris show to carry the 18 other ridersFebruary 5, 2014 at 9:17 pm #993014ShawnoftheDread
Participant@Mikey 76641 wrote:
@ Dread – matchups were designed for competitiveness
I get that. The matchups go in order, they’re just placed on Super Team numbers out of order in one spot.
February 5, 2014 at 9:22 pm #993015Mikey
Participant@ShawnoftheDread 76642 wrote:
I get that. The matchups go in order, they’re just placed on Super Team numbers out of order in one spot.
Yep, 2+9 >> 5+6 , these matchups makes both first round matches more interesting. I don’t want to set up any cakewalks in the first round (espially not the team I would be on).
February 5, 2014 at 9:29 pm #993016KayakCyndi
Participant@Mikey 76641 wrote:
@ cvcalhoun – No, I fully expect the Chris and Chris show to carry the 18 other riders
Great, way to add even more incentive for them to ride!
February 6, 2014 at 2:48 am #993039Subby
ParticipantSlackers should be renamed the Ringers because they are chock full of ass-kicking winter riders. HUGE advantage to be paired with them.
GO GO GO SOOOOOOPERTEAM ONE!!!!
February 6, 2014 at 4:15 am #993044cvcalhoun
ParticipantI love how everyone assumes that Sloppy Seconds will be #1 going forward. For the record, there has actually been only one week that Sloppy Seconds has been on top of the weekly rankings. What has happened is that a different team jettisons to the top each week, but then can’t keep it up the following week. We Sloppies aren’t at the top any one week, but are consistent enough to take top honors overall.
February 6, 2014 at 4:23 am #993045Mikey
Participant@cvcalhoun 76674 wrote:
I love how everyone assumes that Sloppy Seconds will be #1 going forward. For the record, there has actually been only one week that Sloppy Seconds has been on top of the weekly rankings. What has happened is that a different team jettisons to the top each week, but then can’t keep it up the following week. We Sloppies aren’t at the top any one week, but are consistent enough to take top honors overall.
I’m only assuming that they are going to be #1 in 36 min, at the start of FSSB #4.
February 6, 2014 at 4:28 am #993047cvcalhoun
ParticipantAh, okay, I was misreading it to say that you’d set up the teams based on the first week after the start of FSSB #4. If we’re setting them up based on past performance, I would agree it’s unlikely we’ll drop out of first place in the next 32 minutes.
@Mikey 76675 wrote:
I’m only assuming that they are going to be #1 in 36 min, at the start of FSSB #4.
February 6, 2014 at 7:49 am #993052hozn
Participant@cvcalhoun 76640 wrote:
I’m thinking this means those poor Slackers–who joined with the expectation that they wouldn’t be expected to do much of anything–are suddenly going to be under pressure from the #1 team to up their game.
As a member of said team, I would vote that Slackers team not be included (though in realize that throws a wench in the math). Slackers team has no handicap and riders are participating for purely social side effects of the competition. Seems wrong to enter them into the team competition. Of course, it is a side bet, so it may not matter; I personally don’t monitor the leaderboards so I won’t be feeling any extra pressure to ride
February 6, 2014 at 12:09 pm #993055Arlingtonrider
ParticipantDitto.
February 6, 2014 at 1:34 pm #993067consularrider
ParticipantQuote Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
@ cvcalhoun – No, I fully expect the Chris and Chris show to carry the 18 other riders@KayakCyndi 76644 wrote:
Great, way to add even more incentive for them to ride!
Great, now I’ll have to actually ride my handicap.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.