Freezing Saddles scoreboard software updates

This topic has 49 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by hozn.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 49 total)

← 1 2 3 4 →

Author

Posts
February 6, 2015 at 10:34 pm #1022473

TwoWheelsDC
Participant

Just noticed the BAFS website got a nomination in the 2015 WABA Bicyclists Choice awards for “Best Use of Biking Data.” Nice work Hans and all the others who helped pull that together!

February 6, 2015 at 10:50 pm #1022476

rcannon100
Participant

Excellent! For that, I will vote.

February 7, 2015 at 12:22 am #1022478

DismalScientist
Participant

Where’s the ASPCA when we need them?

February 7, 2015 at 12:29 am #1022479

hozn
Participant

Cool – I had no idea. Thanks, whoever nominated it!

February 7, 2015 at 3:38 pm #1022491

GB
Participant

@TwoWheelsDC 107768 wrote:

Just noticed the BAFS website got a nomination in the 2015 WABA Bicyclists Choice awards for “Best Use of Biking Data.” Nice work Hans and all the others who helped pull that together!

Link:

http://www.waba.org/events/washington-area-bicyclists-choice-awards/

February 7, 2015 at 6:53 pm #1022492

Subby
Participant

Please take time to vote for the Freezing Saddles website!

February 17, 2015 at 1:15 am #1023225

Steve O
Participant

There’s some sort of odd step function going on with the coldest ride data. I have a hard time believing 9 people rode at 14.00 degrees and then 22 people all rode at 15.10 degrees with no one in between. Odd.

[IMG]http://bikearlingtonforum.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=7841&stc=1[/IMG]

February 17, 2015 at 1:30 am #1023226

vvill
Participant

@Steve O 108556 wrote:

There’s some sort of odd step function going on with the coldest ride data. I have a hard time believing 9 people rode at 14.00 degrees and then 22 people all rode at 15.10 degrees with no one in between. Odd.

It’s probably just the granularity of temperature that’s available in the weather data being pulled.

February 17, 2015 at 1:34 am #1023229

Steve O
Participant

@vvill 108557 wrote:

It’s probably just the granularity of temperature that’s available in the weather data being pulled.

It didn’t use to do this, though. It just started in the last week or so.

February 17, 2015 at 1:34 am #1023230

hozn
Participant

I suspect that is the case; we use start location. Maybe there are insufficient observations to get things more granular. There could be a bug, of course, though I haven’t seen anything in reviewing that.

February 17, 2015 at 1:35 am #1023231

hozn
Participant

@Steve O 108561 wrote:

It didn’t use to do this, though. It just started in the last week or so.

Hmm, ok. I will look into this more deeply, in that case.

February 17, 2015 at 1:38 am #1023232

jrenaut
Participant

@hozn 108563 wrote:

Hmm, ok. I will look into this more deeply, in that case.

While you’re at it, disqualify people who did their rides in Canada so I can have the Coldest Ride. I mean, Canada’s not even a real place, is it?

February 17, 2015 at 1:40 am #1023235

hozn
Participant

Oh, I was hoping you were volunteering to look into this

Yeah, I think Canada is the same as the Zwift island. Just an oversight that #nobafs was omitted from those rides, I am sure.

February 17, 2015 at 1:48 am #1023237

dkel
Participant

As long as we’re all complaining about the weather reporting () when do the stats get updated? My ride today was much colder than my currently reported coldest ride.

Much, much colder.

Soooo cooold!

February 17, 2015 at 2:03 am #1023239

jrenaut
Participant

@hozn 108567 wrote:

Oh, I was hoping you were volunteering to look into this [/quote]
I know, I’ve been a horrible slacker on the programming front this year. In my defense, I feel terrible about it. I hope to redeem myself by making pages for some pointless prizes as people figure out what they want to give pointless prized for.
Author

Posts