Dogsled Guy’s dog BIT ME — BEWARE

Our Community Forums General Discussion Dogsled Guy’s dog BIT ME — BEWARE

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #914581
    roadrunner
    Participant

    I am posting this here because it is the only local forum where a) people seem to know about Dogsled Guy and b) I needed to warn as many bikers/runners as possible.

    Last Wednesday I went running around 5:30 pm, picking up the W&OD at Sandburg Street (Dunn Loring). As soon as I started on the trail, I noticed someone at least 100 yards ahead of me on what appeared to be a bike with three dogs in front of him. The rider and the dogs had lights on them, so I assumed he was just a normal rider exercising his pets. Just before the footbridge over 495, he pulled off to the grass on the right (I assume to allow the dogs to relieve themselves). As a result, I caught up to him. When I was just about 25 yards away, he pulled out on the trail again, which placed him into the light of 495. This is when I saw (for the first time ever) the man your board has termed Dogsled Guy: a rider with three Siberian huskies, all loosely leashed together to pull him while he spurred them on with a short crop. OK, that is unique, I thought. As we crossed over the bridge, a rider headed toward us. As the rider came closer to Dogsled Guy, all of his dogs starting lunging to the left in the path of the rider. The rider moved quite a bit and zipped past, but I made a note to myself: Do not get near this guy’s dogs.

    As we approached the wooden bridge to Idylwood Park, Dogsled Guy turned in. I was relieved and put on speed up the trail. As I headed up, I glanced left and could see him working his way across the lower baseball field and up to the soccer pitch. As he was going slower than me, I assumed he was going to just run the dogs around the fields, so I gave him no more thought.

    I crossed 66 and started heading downhill on Virginia Lane. Just as I reached the spot where the trail turns slightly left (where you can begin to see Shrevewood Elementary), I heard a shout to my left (probably a name) and then the word “Don’t!” I turned and simultaneously saw and felt a big dog bite me right in the thigh. Dogsled guy and his dogs rushed past me, and then stopped. I shouted at him, “Your dog bit me!” His reaction?

    “Did it break the skin?”

    Not “Are you hurt” or “I can’t believe that happened” or even “Are you OK.” No, it was “Did it break the skin.” I was shocked, partly because of the bite and partly because of his reaction. It was the type of reaction one has when one has BEEN in that situation before, i.e. I was not the first person his dogs had bit. I told him I didn’t know whether the skin was broken (it was dark plus I was wearing running tights, so I couldn’t tell), so I told him to stay put while I went across the street to ask the homeowner to call the sheriff. As I moved away, though, he started to take off! I ran after him and grabbed him by the jacket, something that seemed to take him by surprise. I once again told him not to move while I went across the street. So what did he do? Well, as soon as I was across the street he took off again! Yes, he fled the scene.

    As I wanted to get the sheriff ASAP, I forgot about him and ran to the nearest house. The owner promised to call the sheriff, so I hit the trail hard to try and catch Dogsled Guy. I finally saw him at the intersection of Shreve Road and the trail, but when I got down there he had left the trail and disappeared into the neighborhood. I looked around a bit, but with my leg aching, I headed for home.

    When I got home and got undressed, I saw his dog had put a nice hole in my thigh, so I immediately went to the urgent care center. They dressed the wound and gave me an antibiotic script, but the most interesting part was they filled out a Fairfax County dog bite form. When I asked why, the doctor told me it was mandatory — and it was mandatory for me to report the attack to the County Sheriff! As I was going to do this, this was no problem, so I drove to the Sheriff’s Station in McLean. When I got there to report the incident, however, something interesting had happened: Dogsled Guy had called the bite in himself! Of course, he lied to the police about it, telling them “the runner hadn’t stayed around to give me his name.” Nice — what a piece of work.

    The good news is the dog was quarantined to be tested for rabies (and tested negative). I also had a very good conversation with the Sheriff’s Animal Control Officer, who informed me a file would be opened and his dogs would now be monitored. She did tell me any future reports of attacks/bites would be taken quite seriously, and asked me to pass the word about reporting any incidents with this individual to the Sheriff. So that is what I am doing.

    Good luck, and be extra cautious when you see this man on the trail.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #987250
    baiskeli
    Participant

    @dasgeh 70576 wrote:

    Yes, but dogs actually are not people. There’s a legitimate difference there.

    Hobo the Trail Cat doesn’t like where this is going any more.

    #987255
    consularrider
    Participant

    Probably better to ban the deer who wander the trails than the dogs. There are sections of trails in the Arlington area where I see more people with their dogs than I see people with their bicycles.

    #987256
    baiskeli
    Participant

    Just to play dog-owner’s/devil’s advocate: bikes aren’t people either!

    Nor are the automobiles, so get them off the roads!

    Oh, wait, went too far with that devil thing.

    #987261
    jnva
    Participant

    @roadrunner 70551 wrote:

    Again, my sole intent was to increase awareness. I do not know this man at all, nor do I wish him any harm. I just don’t want anyone else bit.

    So the dog bit you, and you admitted assaulting the owner. Something just doesn’t add up. Since your wound is healing up nicely, and the dogs don’t have rabies (10 day quarantine?) then Im not too worried about his dogs. I’ve had way more bad interactions with people than dogs on the trail. Most people are nice, though.

    #987264
    rcannon100
    Participant

    @baiskeli 70584 wrote:

    Just to play dog-owner’s/devil’s advocate: bikes aren’t people either!

    Nor are the automobiles, so get them off the roads!

    Oh, wait, went too far with that devil thing.

    Yup. This would be the argument taken to completion. If anything that is not human that is a problem can be banned, than we ban bicycles, skateboards, strollers, jogging shoes, cellphones, ipods, …..

    There are lots of bad actors. There is no difference. A cyclists killing a pedestrian. A pedestrian not paying attention because of a cell phone. A skate boarder who latches onto a truck for a free ride. Electric bikes….. Declaring entire tribes forbidden is a non-starter solution. If we as cyclists even begin to suggest that another tribe should be banned because of the actions of a few, then we ourselves have a lot to answer for.

    #987265
    mstone
    Participant

    @baiskeli 70584 wrote:

    Just to play dog-owner’s/devil’s advocate: bikes aren’t people either!.

    I fully support a ban on unmanned bicycles on the trails.

    #987268
    baiskeli
    Participant

    @mstone 70596 wrote:

    I fully support a ban on unmanned bicycles on the trails.

    But what if a dog is riding the bike?

    See, you can’t get anything past me.

    #987270
    Tim Kelley
    Participant

    @baiskeli 70601 wrote:

    But what if a dog is riding the bike?

    See, you can’t get anything past me.

    Looks sketchy.

    #987271
    baiskeli
    Participant

    Hobo the Trail Cat is now extremely concerned about where this thread is going.

    #987274
    mstone
    Participant

    @rcannon100 70595 wrote:

    Yup. This would be the argument taken to completion. If anything that is not human that is a problem can be banned, than we ban bicycles, skateboards, strollers, jogging shoes, cellphones, ipods, …..

    No, that would be a separate and illogical argument. None of those things are independent, uncontrollable sentient beings competing with citizens for use of public property. Bicycles, skateboards, strollers, jogging shoes, cellphones, ipods, etc., have no independent motivation. Pets do. To claim that someone might be suddenly attacked by a skateboard in the same way that someone might suddenly be attacked by a dog is patently absurd.

    #987275
    mstone
    Participant

    @baiskeli 70601 wrote:

    But what if a dog is riding the bike?

    See, you can’t get anything past me.

    I stand by my position.

    #987284
    baiskeli
    Participant

    @mstone 70608 wrote:

    I stand by my position.

    Darn. Because I was totally serious about that.

    #987285
    jnva
    Participant

    Two solutions to this problem.

    1:[ATTACH]4188[/ATTACH]

    2:[ATTACH]4189[/ATTACH]

    #987286
    baiskeli
    Participant

    @mstone 70607 wrote:

    No, that would be a separate and illogical argument. None of those things are independent, uncontrollable sentient beings competing with citizens for use of public property. Bicycles, skateboards, strollers, jogging shoes, cellphones, ipods, etc., have no independent motivation. Pets do. To claim that someone might be suddenly attacked by a skateboard in the same way that someone might suddenly be attacked by a dog is patently absurd.

    If so, as devil’s advocate I’ll ask you why we have restrictions on what vehicles can be on the trails then–cars, motorcycles, mopeds, etc.?

    #987288
    mstone
    Participant

    @baiskeli 70619 wrote:

    If so, as devil’s advocate I’ll ask you why we have restrictions on what vehicles can be on the trails then–cars, motorcycles, mopeds, etc.?

    No, I don’t want this thread to go any further off topic into yet another unproductive discussion. Use the search function to find previous threads addressing your question. I replied to the assertion that a ban on dogs would be equivalent to a ban on things, and the resulting reductio ad absurdum; I made no assertion regarding bans on non-human things, so your devil’s advocacy is misplaced.

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 40 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.