Discussion on Team Points Cap and Non-regional Teams
- This topic has 79 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 4 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Fifth year riding. Here’s what I think of the most significant changes in my book. Oh, this was also the first year that I was a (co-)captain.
1. 100 mile total cap on contributing to the team points – I really liked this. It removed a significant portion of stress from my life and made it possible for me to actually have more hobbies than just riding my bicycle during the winter. Oh, and I got to hang out with my family more. It was still a struggle to reach 100 miles some weeks, but overall this is the level that I liked, personally. I could understand if people want to raise this to 150. But overall, I felt this helped to put more focus on team efforts!
2. Non-regional teams – I didn’t like this as much. Obviously I had a great team (17!), but because of weather and other conflicts I found it difficult to organize rides outside of my local area successfully. Combining this with the team points cap also affected my personal ability to organize group rides with members spanning all three effective regions. I don’t think that the two rule changes mesh very well, and would prefer to get rid of the non-regional teams decision before getting rid of the team points cap decision.
That’s my take on it. I’m curious to hear what others think across the DC metro area. Cheers.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.