Closed thread

Our Community Forums General Discussion Closed thread

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #931867
    Mark Blacknell
    Participant

    I will point out that I, in fact, objected to the thread closure. But Tim Kelley, whoever *that* is, just pretended like he couldn’t hear me.

    Also, too:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]446[/ATTACH]

    #931870
    CCrew
    Participant

    :)
    thread.jpg

    #931966
    Usern Ame
    Participant

    Just thought I’d chime in –

    I agree with Roscoe that that it is rude to block traffic like that.

    I’d compare it to those occasional jackasses in the far left lane that won’t let you past even though slower traffic is meant to stay right. Share the road. It cuts both ways, and I don’t think that phrase was meant to mean that cars should just slow everyone else down by taking up the whole lane.

    #931980
    mstone
    Participant

    so you’re one of those people who just wants to speed along far in excess of the posted limit and expects everyone else to get out of your way. got it.

    #931994
    washcycle
    Participant

    @Usern Ame 10144 wrote:

    Just thought I’d chime in –

    I agree with Roscoe that that it is rude to block traffic like that.

    I’d compare it to those occasional jackasses in the far left lane that won’t let you past even though slower traffic is meant to stay right. Share the road. It cuts both ways, and I don’t think that phrase was meant to mean that cars should just slow everyone else down by taking up the whole lane.

    It’s rude to intentionally and unnecessarily block traffic.

    It’s impossible to prove that it’s intentional and debatable as to what is necessary.

    Thus you can never know if they’re being rude or just more cautious than you’d like. I guess we need to change the saying “You can never be too safe” to “You can never be too safe, unless it inconveniences drivers. Then you can be too safe.”

    #932012
    invisiblehand
    Participant

    @washcycle 10176 wrote:

    It’s rude to intentionally and unnecessarily block traffic.

    It’s impossible to prove that it’s intentional and debatable as to what is necessary.

    Thus you can never know if they’re being rude or just more cautious than you’d like. I guess we need to change the saying “You can never be too safe” to “You can never be too safe, unless it inconveniences drivers. Then you can be too safe.”

    I concur.

    Figuring out what is in someone else’s head is difficult. And more often than not, if you allow for some uncertainty on the part of the “rude” driver/cyclist/pedestrian ahead of you, their actions may not be so “rude”.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.