Buying First "Adult" Bike, Very Confused
Our Community › Forums › Bikes & Equipment › Buying First "Adult" Bike, Very Confused
- This topic has 52 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
americancyclo.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 28, 2013 at 7:05 pm #982364
DismalScientist
ParticipantBikesdirect and Nashbar fully specify their frames and wheelsets. The bikes I suggest had similar framesets and somewhat better components. The reason people buy BD bikes and part out the components is not that the frames are bad, but rather that the price of BD bikes often aren’t significantly higher than retail price of the groupset. I’ve bought a bike each from Nashbar and Bikesdirect and am not disappointed with either frame (although the wheelset on the Nashbar wasn’t particularly good–and there problem could easily and cheaply be lessened by using a good rear skewer).
When my 620 was originally built up, I used a 14-32 freewheel and a Deore rear derailleur. I can tell you from experience that a 28/32 low is perfectly fine for loaded touring in the mountains. I appreciated the 50 (sorry I was wrong: it wasn’t 52) tooth chainring even when touring fully loaded when experiencing tailwinds on the Great Plains. (The current 50/12 high gear is still useful now when putting the hammer down against these ELITE cyclists with their plastic bikes when riding the 620 unloaded.:rolleyes:)
Trek in those days may have been confused in what it was trying to sell–it is not as if trends in cycling are easily predicted. However, they consistently labelled their bikes according to their intended use. Sport-touring is simply an intermediate between racing and touring geometry. At that time, there appeared to be a major shift in demand to more touring bikes, but that shift was obviously very short lived.
September 28, 2013 at 7:30 pm #982366hozn
Participant@DismalScientist 65320 wrote:
Bikesdirect and Nashbar fully specify their frames and wheelsets. The bikes I suggest had similar framesets and somewhat better components. The reason people buy BD bikes and part out the components is not that the frames are bad, but rather that the price of BD bikes often aren’t significantly higher than retail price of the groupset. I’ve bought a bike each from Nashbar and Bikesdirect and am not disappointed with either frame (although the wheelset on the Nashbar wasn’t particularly good–and there problem could easily and cheaply be lessened by using a good rear skewer).
Yeah, in my experience their frames are great. I love my BD Motobecane Le Champion CF frame; it’s not the lightest carbon frame out there (~1200 grams for size 58), but it’s stiff and the attention to detail is impeccable. This frame gets great reviews. I know their ti frames get rave reviews too — both road and mountain — and my coworker loves is alu motobecane road bike — and, yeah, it was like $800 for that bike w/ Sram Apex build. From what I’ve seen the Nashbar frames (admittedly I’ve only seen a couple of CF frames from nashbar) are also quite good. I’m guessing that Nashbar is probably using more open-mould framesets than designing their own, but nothing wrong with that. Yes, people don’t buy BikeDirect bikes for the group; they buy them because they ride “just as nice” as a name-brand bike and cost half the price. (Maybe a bit more if you can catch a good sale at a LBS, but the value proposition is enormous.)
OP, see what you did? You can’t ask for advice about buying a bike on a bike forum. People are way too opinionated. Probably the best place to ask for bike-buying advice is in a public restroom — next urinal/stall over; that should keep the conversation short and on-point, if a bit awkward.
September 28, 2013 at 7:32 pm #982367mstone
ParticipantYou customized it, great, probably because the stock 28 cog was too high.
I think you’re overstating the consistency in their labeling. The 520 was itself both a touring and a sport touring bike at that time, with no significant changes apart from marketing between those model years. I think the 620 was the same frame as the 630 and some of their other models, and they were mostly differentiating on wheels. (Which were themselves more narrow than you’ll usually find on a modern tourer, but there’s much better selection of tires these days. )
September 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm #982369DismalScientist
ParticipantI don’t recall the exact order of things back then. Maybe I had the wheels with the original Heliomatic hubs
for a while before I switched to the Mavic sealed bearing hubs/MA40 rims (40 spokes!) wheelset. Even with the original equipment, it was better than my ’75 Schwinn LeTour with a 39/32 low when we some loaded touring with that.
September 28, 2013 at 7:49 pm #982370jabberwocky
ParticipantI don’t think there is anything wrong with buying online (I personally hate shopping local and buy almost everything online). But I recommend against it for a new rider getting their first bike. Being able to actually test ride is invaluable when you aren’t entirely sure what you want and are completely unfamiliar with how bike geometries differ.
And I’d caution against getting too hung up on the groupsets. There isn’t that big a difference between them. Is 105 a bit better than Tiagra? Sure. Is Ultegra a bit nicer than 105? Yeah. Is Tiagra still perfectly functional? Absolutely. Its not like a less expensive group is going to get you to work any slower or prevent you from riding further or anything.
September 28, 2013 at 8:38 pm #982373mstone
ParticipantMy first 10 speed was a Le Tour. Didn’t tour on it, though.
September 29, 2013 at 3:51 am #982382americancyclo
ParticipantMy first ten speed was a Panasonic Sport 500. Was I sporty? Jury still out. Maybe deserves its own thread.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.