2-Wk Custis Trail Detour, Aug 24-Sep 6
Our Community › Forums › Road and Trail Conditions › 2-Wk Custis Trail Detour, Aug 24-Sep 6
- This topic has 38 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 7 months ago by
mstone.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 10, 2020 at 3:06 pm #1106508
DanB
Participant@ursus 202263 wrote:
Agreed. If they want those who want to follow the rules but don’t go there daily to go on the correct side, they will have to put up several signs.
They could use this as a template–for clarity.[ATTACH]21672[/ATTACH]
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
September 11, 2020 at 10:59 am #1106511consularrider
Participant@Starduster 202223 wrote:
We have a traffic circle on a bike path.
We have a traffic circle on a bike path!
Is this new design practice?
There’s been the W&OD mm0 traffic circle forever, hardly anyone follows traffic circle etiquette there.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21674[/ATTACH]
September 11, 2020 at 2:35 pm #1106513zsionakides
Participant@consularrider 202273 wrote:
There’s been the W&OD mm0 traffic circle forever, hardly anyone follows traffic circle etiquette there.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21674[/ATTACH]
I had no idea that was actually supposed to be a traffic circle. I thought it was just for decoration.
That being said I rode through this new traffic circle on the Custis trail yesterday and can pretty much guarantee people going eastbound will cut the circle if it’s open.
September 11, 2020 at 2:41 pm #1106515dbb
Participant@consularrider 202273 wrote:
There’s been the W&OD mm0 traffic circle forever, hardly anyone follows traffic circle etiquette there.
When the trail is tangent to one side of the circle, it isn’t likely that it will get treated like a circle. Most riders (myself included) see the area to the left in the photo as an off-trail paved area.
September 11, 2020 at 4:04 pm #1106518Starduster
Participant@consularrider 202273 wrote:
There’s been the W&OD mm0 traffic circle forever, hardly anyone follows traffic circle etiquette there.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21674[/ATTACH]
Oh that one? I always treated it as the trail terminus, largely because of the major intersection just beyond, which dominates the path of travel. Custis @ Bluemont is more like a roadgoing traffic circle. I will ride it soon enough and will report back…
September 11, 2020 at 4:06 pm #1106519Starduster
Participant@Sunyata 202245 wrote:
Mountain bikers on commuter bikes will also love it.
#WWDDWe all know someone here who will bunny-hop it!
😎
September 13, 2020 at 2:06 pm #1106534Starduster
ParticipantRode through the Custis/Bon Air traffic circle yesterday.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21675[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]21676[/ATTACH]
First pic is approaching westbound from the detour. While I was here, a couple of serious cyclists passed through eastbound and navigated the circle as we should, without drama. Second shot is from where you would approach from the Custis underpass. This really isn’t going to be a big problem…
September 13, 2020 at 2:38 pm #1106536zsionakides
ParticipantWent through eastbound this morning and coming out of the circle to the hill requires a pretty sharp turn. If someone cut the wrong way across the circle it’d be hard to see them unless you looked back for them.
I think the intent here was good, but I can bet that favored paths will involve cutting the circle eastbound the way it’s situated.
September 13, 2020 at 5:49 pm #1106537DanB
ParticipantHow do I signal coming up to a little circle like this one? If you’re eastbound and want to go through the underpass (when it opens), I think it’ll be best to signal a left turn as before–and then go counterclockwise around the island.
There’s the chance that some may think you’re going to cut left before the center island, but I don’t think that can be helped. It might make other trail users more cautious, because the intentions aren’t totally clear. That could be a good thing.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
September 13, 2020 at 6:10 pm #1106538dbb
Participant[ATTACH=CONFIG]21678[/ATTACH]
Here is a shot from Friday morning. This is the uphill exit from the circle and evidence of folks cutting the corner (I’m of the position that these are inadvertent).
Not sure any cyclists were consulted in the design. If Arlington only had some group that would offer advice on such matters. Maybe they could call it a Bicycle Advisory Group, or something like that.
September 13, 2020 at 9:38 pm #1106540zsionakides
ParticipantAfter seeing this, I’d prefer they just go back to the T intersection with the stop sign on the Custis trail part. Moving the intersection away from the overpass fixed the sight line problem, but adding this circle in creates a whole new set of problems that didn’t exist before. This isn’t really a high traffic location that benefits from such a traffic device.
September 13, 2020 at 10:16 pm #1106541Steve O
ParticipantI’ll have to check it out, but I think a circle seems like a round peg in a slightly ovalized hole or something.
I can imagine something that functions like the circle but is not shaped like it, more like an elongated triangle. What the designers missed was that 90%+ of the traffic is the Custis and only a small fraction will use the south-side detour route. That’s just a neighborhood connector, really.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21679[/ATTACH]
September 13, 2020 at 11:56 pm #1106543Judd
ParticipantHow many laps of the new traffic circle do you guys think I can do in a single day? #NewHainsPoint
September 14, 2020 at 12:52 am #1106545dbb
Participant@Judd 202310 wrote:
How many laps of the new traffic circle do you guys think I can do in a single day? #NewHainsPoint
Remember to pause your Garmin when you stop to puke!
September 14, 2020 at 1:00 am #1106546dbb
Participant@Steve O 202308 wrote:
I’ll have to check it out, but I think a circle seems like a round peg in a slightly ovalized hole or something.
I can imagine something that functions like the circle but is not shaped like it, more like an elongated triangle. What the designers missed was that 90%+ of the traffic is the Custis and only a small fraction will use the south-side detour route. That’s just a neighborhood connector, really.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]21679[/ATTACH]
Steve’s sketch would have allowed eastbound riders to make a fairly clean left turn to go under the interstate. The installed circle abandons that 90 degree opportunity and instead gives something closer to 135 degrees. Alas, we have something else.
I fear that most westbound riders will just salmon that short segment. Great chances for chaos.
It will be interesting to look at the corner of the exit heading to the current detour route. The mud there will show the number of riders that didn’t stay on the asphalt.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.