What Frame To Use

Our Community Forums Bikes & Equipment What Frame To Use

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1064033
    MFC
    Participant

    I know you were asking about used, but you may want to consider someplace such as Nashbar for new frame. They may be able to give you some advice, their prices are good and things are constantly on sale, and have a pretty good return policy. I used them when I built up a road bike There are lot of frames for sale on ebay, but there seemed to be a lot of knock-off frames, and I felt more comfortable going with a company with a U.S. presence.

    #1064040
    trailrunner
    Participant

    First of all, you didn’t specify if you wanted a road frame or a mountain bike frame, but from the sound of things, you want a mountain bike frame.

    The 19 on your bike most likely refers to the size for a mountain-bike (or flat-bar) bike. In the old days, those bikes were measured in inches, whereas road bikes were measured in cm. The numbers nominally refer to the seat tube length, but there were several different ways to measure this, such as center-to-center and center-to-top. Nowadays, a lot of bike manufacturers do not use this method, and instead use S, M, L, XL, sometimes with intermediate sizes, such as ML. In your case, go to the Jamis website and look up the measurements of your frame, and try to replicate that. Usually the two most important measurements are top-tube length and seat-tube length. Another idiosyncrasy of measuring frame sizes is dealing with sloping top tubes, so keep that in mind if you run across virtual top-tube lengths. You should buy your frame to as close to the proper size you need, and fine-tune the size with things like stem length and rise. There’s only so much you can do with the fine-tuning, so getting the proper frame size is important. This is actually a whole topic by itself, but getting the proper fit is perhaps the most important thing factor in getting a new bike.

    You didn’t say why you wanted to build up a bike. If it’s to save money, you will likely be disappointed unless you already have bins of parts in your basement that you can use to build a franken-bike. If you are buying all the parts separately, or even starting with a groupset, you will likely wind up paying 2-3x more than if you bought the bike complete and already assembled from your LBS. If you’re building the bike to get the experience and the satisfaction of riding something you built, then that’s a great reason. Depending on what kind of general tools you already have, you will still need to buy some specialized tools.

    As far as rust goes, a little surface rust is OK. Use common sense. I probably wouldn’t pay for a used frame with rust unless it was something I just had to have. As far frame painting goes, that’s one thing that I don’t do. I’ve built and re-built bikes from scratch, but I will pay someone else do the painting for me. I just don’t like painting, and there are places that will do it all, including prep work, cheap enough (~$100, IIRC). I’ve had frames powder coated and painted, and I’ve used local places as well as places where I had to send my frame in. I usually opt for a utilitarian, single color, but there are places that specialize in completely replicating the original frame color scheme, complete with stickers. Those are usually for restoring classic or vintage frames, not for the run-of-the-mill commuter.

    MFC recommended Nashbar, and that’s a good idea. They usually have some cheap, generic, not ultra-light frames for $100-150 or so. I’ve never bought one, but I know people who have, and they are attractive for building a basic bike.

    You should also keep in mind basic compatabilities for things like bottom bracket type, headset size and type, seat post size, drop out spacing, disc brake mountings, and things like that. And when you start building it up, you have to ensure that your parts are compatible with the frame and with each other. It’s not rocket surgery, but it’s something that you need to keep in mind.

    #1064048
    BobCochran
    Participant

    Thank you both for your help. I’m interested in a road bike — one that can be equipped with metal fenders, wide tires, front and rear racks. I’m thinking in terms of a randonneuring type bicycle. Mainly I want to do the project to have a bike of my own — one that will give me freedom to try out different components. For instance, from what I’ve read, I’m guessing that drop bars can’t easily be substituted for the flat bars on my Jamis because the frame geometry is wrong for drop bars. I currently have 2 bicycles with flat bars and I think I need to experiment with drop bars. Trying out different parts is a big goal, to get a sense of what my own preferences are and what I think will work for me.

    As to cost, I realize a project like this will cost me more than just going to a shop and buying a bike off the showroom floor. Bicycle Quarterly recently published an article on a 1980s Trek road bicycle that someone converted into a reasonable randonneuring bicycle. That sort of a project is what I’m thinking of, except I don’t have a parts bin that I can fall back on to reduce costs. Also, the Trek model in that article didn’t really allow for wide tires.

    Thanks a ton

    Bob

    #1064057
    hozn
    Participant

    Sounds like a fun project, and your proposed build sounds great, but you should prepare for this project to get expensive. It sounds like you have no expectations of reusing existing parts, so you are probably expecting that this won’t be cheap. Also, plan to buy multiple versions of the various components you need — i.e. when ordering bike stuff, you will probably order the wrong one at least once. Road stuff is a little easier than mountain, but the ecosystem is full of incompatible pieces. This is partly why building yourself is always way more expensive than buying the off-the-shelf bike. That and not getting access to wholesale pricing for components :) — If you buy everything used and don’t make too many mistakes, you might be able to get close in price. I recently did a paint & build-up project for my son’s bike (I think you saw that thread) and ignoring all the things I got/had for free (frame, bars, hubs, brake calipers & rotors) that was still a ~$1k project. (And I got the components right the first time, since I spent many days researching — and I had all the tools I needed.)

    I would say that you should try to figure out your road frame sizing, though. There are numerous online calculators, so start there; probably start with a fairly “non-agressive” (i.e. upright) position — calculators should ask you for that sort of input. Nothing would be more frustrating than building up the bike and realizing after a couple weeks that the frame is not the right size. To some extent you can err on the side of smaller and then size up with longer stems or more spacers, but doing that changes how a bike rides — and especially on a touring bike, you probably wouldn’t want super twitchy steering (long stem).

    Steel is fine — so is any other material, really. Powdercoating is somewhere around $100-150 around here. They’ll mediablast it and they may offer some additional ($$) services for rust removal, but I wouldn’t buy a rusty frame. See if you can find a used ti frame on ebay (once you know your size). Or buy a chinese ti frame for ~$600-800 if your budget allows it! :)

    Definitely go disc brakes if you want the flexibility to run big tires or switch between 700c and 650b. I would spec a frame with clearance for 700x45mm (which is what my Habanero frame has) and then also clearance for 650bx2.1 — then it could serve as a great mountain bike (of sorts) or a touring with 35mm tires + full fenders. If you can, get a frame that takes a tapered (1.125-1.5″) fork, though you can make do with a straight 1.125 fork if you must. There is only one full-carbon straight-steerer fork with fender eyelets, that I’m aware of (the Spot CX fork; it costs ~$400 new; I got mine for closer to $200 used on eBay). Frame supporting tapered fork definitely increases your options. Less critical, though, if you’re thinking of using a steel fork.

    Anyway, keep us posted!

    #1064060
    Judd
    Participant

    @hozn 152873 wrote:

    I recently did a paint & build-up project for my son’s bike (I think you saw that thread) and ignoring all the things I got/had for free (frame, bars, hubs, brake calipers & rotors) that was still a ~$1k project. (And I got the components right the first time, since I spent many days researching — and I had all the tools I needed.)

    !

    Sounds like your best strategy is to try to get hozn to adopt you. If you do a build, would love to see you document it on the forums.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #1064063
    Rockford10
    Participant

    This seems like a great time to remind forum members I have a 54 Soma Wolverine frameset for sale. As Soma says: “Its geometry is stable enough for off road touring, but sporty enough for all-around adventure.”

    You can usually find DKel out in the wild on a 56 belt drive Wolverine and I can probably arrange a test ride. [ATTACH=CONFIG]13265[/ATTACH]

    #1064076
    BobCochran
    Participant

    @hozn 152873 wrote:

    Sounds like a fun project, and your proposed build sounds great, but you should prepare for this project to get expensive. It sounds like you have no expectations of reusing existing parts, so you are probably expecting that this won’t be cheap. Also, plan to buy multiple versions of the various components you need — i.e. when ordering bike stuff, you will probably order the wrong one at least once. Road stuff is a little easier than mountain, but the ecosystem is full of incompatible pieces. This is partly why building yourself is always way more expensive than buying the off-the-shelf bike. That and not getting access to wholesale pricing for components :) — If you buy everything used and don’t make too many mistakes, you might be able to get close in price. I recently did a paint & build-up project for my son’s bike (I think you saw that thread) and ignoring all the things I got/had for free (frame, bars, hubs, brake calipers & rotors) that was still a ~$1k project. (And I got the components right the first time, since I spent many days researching — and I had all the tools I needed.)

    I would say that you should try to figure out your road frame sizing, though. There are numerous online calculators, so start there; probably start with a fairly “non-agressive” (i.e. upright) position — calculators should ask you for that sort of input. Nothing would be more frustrating than building up the bike and realizing after a couple weeks that the frame is not the right size. To some extent you can err on the side of smaller and then size up with longer stems or more spacers, but doing that changes how a bike rides — and especially on a touring bike, you probably wouldn’t want super twitchy steering (long stem).

    Steel is fine — so is any other material, really. Powdercoating is somewhere around $100-150 around here. They’ll mediablast it and they may offer some additional ($$) services for rust removal, but I wouldn’t buy a rusty frame. See if you can find a used ti frame on ebay (once you know your size). Or buy a chinese ti frame for ~$600-800 if your budget allows it! :)

    Definitely go disc brakes if you want the flexibility to run big tires or switch between 700c and 650b. I would spec a frame with clearance for 700x45mm (which is what my Habanero frame has) and then also clearance for 650bx2.1 — then it could serve as a great mountain bike (of sorts) or a touring with 35mm tires + full fenders. If you can, get a frame that takes a tapered (1.125-1.5″) fork, though you can make do with a straight 1.125 fork if you must. There is only one full-carbon straight-steerer fork with fender eyelets, that I’m aware of (the Spot CX fork; it costs ~$400 new; I got mine for closer to $200 used on eBay). Frame supporting tapered fork definitely increases your options. Less critical, though, if you’re thinking of using a steel fork.

    Anyway, keep us posted!

    Thank you very much, you offer a lot of good advice here. I like the way you say the ecosystem is full of incompatible pieces. That is very good. And yes, I will be prepared to spend money and discover I ordered the wrong part more than a few times. Same story in home improvement work: oh, it is time to go back to Lowe’s because I really need this other part.

    I will work on getting my frame size calculated. That is my starting point.

    Thanks a ton!

    Bob

    #1064077
    BobCochran
    Participant

    Trailrunner, Judd, Rockford10: Thanks a lot for the great ideas.

    Bob

    #1064088
    anomad
    Participant

    For a road bike with big tires and fenders you are going to want some kind of touring or adventure touring frameset. Another option would be to start with a used bike that is close to what you are aiming for, customize the hell out of it, and start your own parts bin. A Volagi Viaje frameset would be pretty ideal for what you describe, but they aren’t easy to find. Surly Trucker or Cross Check also come to mind as well as a couple Salsa offerings. There’s a bunch of other boutique brands like the Volagi that I am not as personally familiar with. Disc brakes are the only way to go.

    26 inch wheels are not en vogue at the moment, but they will get you down the road or trail just fine. They’re cheap and plentiful. Considering something with that wheel size isn’t a bad idea since you’re shooting for larger tire volume and full fenders.

    A few years ago I built a Nashbar aluminum touring frame with spare parts (mostly) I had from a Surly Cross Check. Its been a great commuter bike but 35c tires are about as big as you’d want with full fenders. I run 32c tires. The geometry on that frame is a little weird too, I have to run a mile of spacers or a short high rise stem. Neither of which are ideal.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]13270[/ATTACH]

    #1064134
    huskerdont
    Participant

    Bob, this sounds fun. Really hope you post pics of progress. The tools will add up in expense, but then you’ll have them for future projects and repairs.

    I would consider, instead of looking for only a frame, looking for an entire used bike, then using the frame from that. Disassemble it and replace with other components (or reuse some of them if desired). You still get the frame, you could save some money on parts, and the extra bonus is that you get to get on the assembled bike and make sure it’s the right size for you. It also sometimes helps to install something if you’ve already removed it.

    However you do it, have fun. Since you have other bikes, you can take your time and not stress about it.

    #1064141
    vvill
    Participant

    I would still just buy a complete bike. If you don’t know much about parts and compatibility nor what you prefer it will be easier to start with a nice riding, coherent build and then swap out parts as necessary or as you feel like experimenting. Manufacturers generally put together a sensible combination of parts, especially on something like a gravel/touring bike where there is more emphasis on comfort/handling over longer rides, and durability, and less on aggressive geometries and lightweight parts, compared to a racing road bike. And other than pedals, the only thing you might mess with to begin with is a different saddle (even then, I’ve only had one stock saddle ever that I’ve really hated). The two major adjustments for fit (assuming you have the right frame size) – stem/handlebar and saddle position, can be adjusted to an extent with just a multi-tool.

    Most bikes in the touring/gravel/adventure segment should suit your needs, although if you are open to buying a new bike specifically marketed for 700c + 650b compatibility, there’s these
    Diamondback Haanjo https://www.bikerumor.com/2016/07/13/monstrous-new-diamondback-haanjo-carbon-adventure-bike-will-tackle-epic-ride/
    Open U.P. https://opencycle.com/up/ (a review is pending on Bicycle Quarterly, I believe)
    3T Exploro https://www.bikerumor.com/2016/06/11/3t-hits-the-gravel-with-all-new-multi-surface-exploro-carbon-frame-and-650b-wheels-first-look/

    The DB Haanjo comes in a bunch of pre-configured variations, including 650b, drop bar, flat bar, etc. and would easily be relatively inexpensive (the other two are carbon only).

    I recently got a Salsa Warbird which fills this niche for me although I haven’t tried 650b wheels yet. The Raleigh Roker/Tamland was a close second. I also considered the Diamondback Haanjo, GT Grade, Jamis Renegade, Kona Rove, etc. (Open U.P. as well, but it was well out of budget.) Many models are available in more than one of the main materials (steel/aluminum/carbon/titanium). The Surly Disc Trucker is an option too if you want steel and. The Warbird will definitely take 700×42, and the Roker too from what I recall, but some of the others may max out around 40mm. Even the “big 4” road brands have options nowadays (Specialized AWOL, Giant AnyRoad, Trek 520/720, Cannondale Slate).

    Websites like http://g-tedproductions.blogspot.com/ http://ridinggravel.forumchitchat.com/ http://gravelcyclist.com and theradavist.com may also give you some ideas as to where riders and companies are going with their builds these days. I read quite a bit about riders’ impressions of bikes like the Raleigh and Salsa online before I pulled the trigger.

    Even if you’re not looking to specifically ride on gravel, gravel/adventure riders do look for a mix of speed and comfort over long distances and use 35-40mm tires (or more), so it suits your interests. Most organized competitive gravel rides are also not subject to UCI regulations so the bike designs and component choices have arguably been more purpose driven, varied, and adapted faster than road racing bikes (which seem to constantly beat the drum of “x% more lightweight y% more aero and z% stiffer than last year’s model”). Before the bike industry spawned the “gravel/adventure” bike category, there were of course already touring bikes but they tended to really emphasize classic designs, and heavier durable parts – whereas gravel racers went closer towards to a road bike in terms of lighter weight, and modern components.

    It’s certainly possible to change the Jamis to drop bars, but you might find the reach to the hoods a little long, depending on how it’s set up. The biggest problem with drop bar conversions is you’ll need at a minimum new shifters/brake levers which are expensive, and likely brake calipers too.

    #1064193
    BobCochran
    Participant

    Thanks everyone! I have a lot of reading, research, and thinking to do based on the advice given here.

    I’ll say something in due course.

    Thanks a ton

    Bob

    #1064206
    EasyRider
    Participant

    Those late 80s Trek 650b conversions are fine if the goal is to make a bike you already love a little more capable. But it sounds like you know what you want (maybe a VO Polyvalent m4, Soma GR?). A converted a frame that you don’t yet own would only get you halfway there.

    #1064228
    dkel
    Participant

    I love drop bar bikes with fat tires. My research over time has found that touring bikes are very flexible with regard to tire size and ability to take fenders and racks, but will often only allow tires up into the 30-something with fenders. The “adventure bike” category is relatively new, and will frequently allow tire widths into the 40s with fenders. The difficulty is that there aren’t yet many offerings in that category. A Surly Straggler will allow at least 41s with fenders, and is available in a 650b version. You should totes buy that Wolverine frameset, though. Not that I have a personal interest in it or anything.

    #1064268
    EasyRider
    Participant

    @dkel 153048 wrote:

    You should totes buy that Wolverine frameset, though. Not that I have a personal interest in it or anything.

    If Soma made a 650b Wolverine like Surly does with the Straggler, I’d have already bought one, instead of joining the NFE waitlist. On paper, the smallest 50cm Wolverine has nearly the same frame measurements as my 53cm RB-T. Putting tires bigger than 40cm on it (the whole point) would probably take the standover up to 32″. That’s at the tip-top of the range for me at 5’7″, particularly if riding on rough stuff and I wanted to be able to put a foot down in a hurry.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.