Virginia anti-mask law is still on the books

Our Community Forums General Discussion Virginia anti-mask law is still on the books

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #914751
    PotomacCyclist
    Participant

    § 18.2-422. Prohibition of wearing of masks in certain places; exceptions.

    It shall be unlawful for any person over sixteen years of age while wearing any mask, hood or other device whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, to be or appear in any public place, or upon any private property in this Commonwealth without first having obtained from the owner or tenant thereof consent to do so in writing. However, the provisions of this section shall not apply to persons (i) wearing traditional holiday costumes; (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment or other activities and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons; (iii) engaged in any bona fide theatrical production or masquerade ball; or (iv) wearing a mask, hood or other device for bona fide medical reasons upon (a) the advice of a licensed physician or osteopath and carrying on his person an affidavit from the physician or osteopath specifying the medical necessity for wearing the device and the date on which the wearing of the device will no longer be necessary and providing a brief description of the device, or (b) the declaration of a disaster or state of emergency by the Governor in response to a public health emergency where the emergency declaration expressly waives this section, defines the mask appropriate for the emergency, and provides for the duration of the waiver. The violation of any provisions of this section shall constitute a Class 6 felony.

    (Code 1950, §§ 18.1-364, 18.1-367; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1986, c. 19; 2010, cc. 262, 420.)

    http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-422

    (f) For Class 6 felonies, a term of imprisonment of not less than one year nor more than five years, or in the discretion of the jury or the court trying the case without a jury, confinement in jail for not more than 12 months and a fine of not more than $2,500, either or both.

    http://leg1.state.va.us/000/cod/18.2-10.HTM



    The Virginia Bicycling Federation reported on an effort to modify the law a year ago. Those efforts were unsuccessful. Although no cyclists appear to have been charged under this law for wearing a mask/balaclava, the threat of prosecution remains. Apparently the law was originally passed to counter KKK activities. It was later argued that it might help to deter bank robbers, although I’m not so sure about that one. (A bank robber is already committing multiple serious offenses. I don’t think he will worry too much about breaking the anti-mask law as well.)

    http://www.vabike.org/wearing-a-winter-mask-still-a-felony-in-virginia/

    Again, no cyclists have been arrested under this law in recent years, but one of the VBF board members stated that he had been stopped and told he was in violation of the law, and could be charged with a felony.

    This topic has probably been discussed before on the forum, but I think it’s good to bring it up again each winter, until the law has been modified.

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #990458
    DismalScientist
    Participant

    What do you expect from Southerners? I hear they cancel school when it gets too “cold,” even when the temperature is above zero!

    #990460
    rcannon100
    Participant

    Dang, halloween and mardi gras must suck in Virginia.

    (any enforcement would probably be so rife with civil rights problems I am not sure I would worry)

    ((If you are really concerned, just right “Winter Sucks” across your mask and then it is a first amendment issue))

    #990462
    Arlingtonrider
    Participant

    Yes, I think we had this discussion last year or maybe the year before that. Thanks for mentioning that perhaps the law could be modified, but I doubt that anyone will want to re-open it and risk having the inability to enforce it where it should be enforced. Unless there is a real problem, aside from that one individual who stopped the VBF board member, I’m not overly concerned about it. I think good safety/health arguments could be made to challenge any enforcement efforts against cyclists, skiers, etc.

    #990492
    mattotoole
    Participant
    Quote:
    ((If you are really concerned, just right “Winter Sucks” across your mask and then it is a first amendment issue))

    Best idea yet! Sadly, no bill to get behind this year.

    #990493
    Fast Friendly Guy
    Participant

    @PotomacCyclist 73964 wrote:

    § 18.2-422. Prohibition of wearing of masks in certain places; exceptions.

    It shall be unlawful for any person over sixteen years of age while wearing any mask, hood or other device whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered so as to conceal the identity of the wearer……However, the provisions of this section shall not apply to persons …. (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment or other activities and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons;

    Lucky thing Trish N lives in MD. (seen her Strava photo lately?) I think we’re okay based on (ii), however, I intend to do my part by almost never robbing either a bank or a 7-11 while riding my bike on a really cold day. I ask all my fellow riders to join me in setting this good example. Note: if you do feel compelled to do a hold-up, please, for all of us, leave your bike at home. Dave

    #990495
    Rod Smith
    Participant

    I briefly acquired a bit of notoriety when the bicycle riding bank robber was discovered to be a contractor with Quick Messenger Service named Rod (it was the other Rod, not me).

    #990496
    Brent
    Participant

    @PotomacCyclist 73964 wrote:

    (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment or other activities and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons;

    I am not a lawyer, but I’m pretty sure this puts cyclists in a safe position. Protecting your face from the cold is definitely a physical safety issue.

    Sent from my XT1056 using Tapatalk

    #990499
    Amalitza
    Guest

    @Rod Smith 74003 wrote:

    (it was the other Rod, not me).

    So you say…

    #990509
    Terpfan
    Participant

    Kind of surprising they still haven’t changed it given the broad range of folks it would encompass from cyclists to skiers, hunters, teenagers playing paintball, Halloween, etc. Or at least change the designation from felony to misdemeanor. I wonder what stopped the change before? My guess is prosecutors probably argued for it claiming they only use it judiciously (heard that argument about small scale poker games several times from similar organizations in another life/career).

Viewing 9 replies - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.