Starduster
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
StardusterParticipant@Judd 226505 wrote:
The bad patch of trail bumps on the north end of Gravelly Point were removed on Saturday by Friends of the Mount Vernon Trail.
Check out the work at https://youtu.be/RNmQVDHWjVQ?si=73xYS4ZKDcK_1Pq4
I recognize that song!!!

StardusterParticipant#Vezzaford, welcome back! If I may offer my own input, based on 10 years as a bike commuter (The Bicycle Exchange, VA), all the Monuments at Night rides I led for Papillon Cycles, and a self taught “Universite du CIBIÉ” education…
I have always considered a bicycle “incomplete” unless it is set up for night work. It is confining to be limited to daylight hours. With great lights, night riding can be an *absolute blast*. But it can get very scary very quickly if your lights fail you. Being seen is important, but *being able to see* is more so. Quality lighting is now available regardless of the format you choose- rechargeable battery, permanent dynohub installation, or E-bike.
For *off-road* trail riding, there is already plenty of product out there. Perfect, provided you don’t point your driving lights at oncoming cyclists (que the “Cover your lights!!!” rant). If you are illuminating someone’s face, you are blinding them. Simple. But most of us are riding on the street or the W&OD, with oncoming traffic. I run European spec *layered beam* headlights from Busch+Muller on everything but my vintage Peugeot (which carries period correct “glowing filament” lighting. I have the other bikes for serious night work). These lights have a sharp cutoff, for maximum forward range *without* blinding oncoming traffic. *Just like* a good automotive low beam headlight- the headlights we and our parents and grandparents grew up with. Many of them designed to meet European road approvals. The best known of these are the German road traffic standards- StVZO. If you ride a recent E-bike, you likely already have a headlight like this installed as original equipment. That’s a *good* thing. Even better, we’re now seeing switchable low beam/high beam lamps for the trail. Just like a motorcycle…


First & 3rd pics are a B+M CYO Premium, showing the sharp cutoff, and a wide even spread of light with forward range. The 2nd, a more recent B+M IQ-X, which my Trek 412 currently runs. I should mention that *both* USB-rechargable and permanent dynohub lights offer the same output levels now. E-bike standards & requirements have evolved to now allow even more lumens & lux plus a high beam function. Regardless, just like your headlights on the car, you should properly aim those lights for best results, keeping the top of the beam’s hot spot at or below 0 degrees horizontal. These lights are no longer the exclusive province of the Europeans- Busch+Muller, SON/Schmidt, or Supernova. Check out product from Trek (their Kindbeam lamps) or Outbound Lighting.

On my wife’s Breezer, battery powered Euro-spec taillights from B+M and Spanninga. Both steady lights, and despite their diminutive size, each is motor-vehicle-taillight bright, as they should be. Most new E-bikes are equipped this way.
On flashing lights…Be honest, they are a *defensive* lighting measure needed to make sure a distracted/inattentive motorist sees you. Hopefully. Such is our reality on the streets. It should not be, but it is. But *not* needed on the bike trail, where you are the biggest meanest whatever on the trail. If you run bright flashers on the road after dark, I recommend pairing them with a steady light. I found it is difficult for a driver to accurately judge closing distance to a blinking light. I, as a driver, once had a close call with a cyclist that way.
Hope I haven’t thrown too much at you. But I also want you to be safe out there.
StardusterParticipant@reji 226500 wrote:
Still closed as of 9AM 12/6
[ATTACH=CONFIG]30921[/ATTACH]A live report at Noon from WJLA Ch. 7 indicates that section still closed. Probably from George Mason drive up to the Holiday Inn.
StardusterParticipant@lordofthemark 219649 wrote:
Watching me try to ride with a cup of coffee should be a treat for all.
There’s a tool for that. The Zojirushi mugs are worth the treasure hunt. Yeti also makes excellent mugs.[ATTACH=CONFIG]30915[/ATTACH]
StardusterParticipant@consularrider 226254 wrote:
Got an email today that there will be light give-aways on November 1 (Rosslyn), November 2 (MVT near CC Connector), and November 3 (W&OD at Columbia Pike) from 4 to 6 PM. This time they are doing it before daylight saving ends (November 5)Anyone know if they are looking for volunteers to help?
Yes, they are! https://www.bikearlington.com/events/. The Eventbrite registration may be filled, but they will not turn away anyone who wants to help!
StardusterParticipant@JorgeGortex 226224 wrote:
If you use the Custis, beware the walnuts in the section of trail between Lincoln St. and 20th St. Also, at the junction where the Roosevelt Bridge spur meets the start of the Trollheim bridge heading south. Those sneaky buggers could kick a tire sidewise causing an accident. FWIW.
Walnuts, you said? [ATTACH=CONFIG]30895[/ATTACH]
October 3, 2023 at 12:20 am in reply to: Survey on a project to close the trail gap on the inland MVT #1126786
StardusterParticipant@Starduster 226184 wrote:
That makes good sense.
But in the meantime, can they make the rail crossing at Pendelton safer for cyclists to traverse?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]30890[/ATTACH]
This is the crossing angle if you go due straight eastbound on Pendleton.
StardusterParticipantLast posting for September. I had to report an emerging problem with the freshly paved Doctors Run Connector. The section above the picnic area has a steep dropoff on the downhill side.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]30889[/ATTACH]
And it appears some of that new asphalt has crumbled and fallen down the hill. I hope *without* taking a pedestrian or cyclist with it. It has been reported to Arlington County.
Ignore the tire pump image. That belongs elsewhere.
StardusterParticipant@Judd 226205 wrote:
I seem to recall that Arlington built this park so it should be a 311 request.
There are replacement seals for these pumps that are supposed to be replaced yearly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK folks, I reported this to Arlington County on the website.
September 26, 2023 at 1:24 pm in reply to: Cyclist killed on River Rd near Little Falls Pkwy, Bethesda, 8/26/22 #1126883
StardusterParticipantAn update, from today’s Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/09/25/langenkamp-sarah-plea-bike-crash-bethesda/
The truck driver pleaded guilty, was fined $2000.00. “Sufficient justice”?
StardusterParticipantI came. I saw. I rode. It was not bad at all. Granted, this was not during peak volume for this park. There will *still* be times when “full time trial mode” is not possible. But if it helps us cyclists co-exist better with the locals who picnic and fish here…
[ATTACH=CONFIG]30881[/ATTACH]
September 22, 2023 at 1:42 pm in reply to: Survey on a project to close the trail gap on the inland MVT #1126872
StardusterParticipant@lordofthemark 226178 wrote:
IIRC there was talk of using the spur for construction materials for the HilCo development.
That makes good sense.
But in the meantime, can they make the rail crossing at Pendelton safer for cyclists to traverse?
September 20, 2023 at 12:41 am in reply to: Survey on a project to close the trail gap on the inland MVT #1126866
StardusterParticipant@Judd 226162 wrote:
If you’re looking for suggested comments, Friends of the Mount Vernon Trail have some here: https://mountvernontrail.org/2023/09/10/friends-of-mount-vernon-trail-endorses-e-abingdon-drive-bike-lane-project-option-2/
Judd: Is the CSX railroad spur & sidings that used to service the power plant and Robinson Terminal officially abandoned? The multiple tracks between E. Abington & N. Fairfax (behind the power plant) are seriously overgrown and reclaimed by nature-not a chance of rail traffic using it in its current state. Further south, while a couple of switches and sidings are removed, there is *still* the single track that crosses the Pendelton and N. Union turn, (with a rail crossing of Pendleton at a dangerously narrow angle,) serving the final Robinson Terminal building, and dead ending at the water project. What are Alexandria’s plans for that?
StardusterParticipant@consularrider 226134 wrote:
Ballston connector has been repaved by the Beaver Pond
[ATTACH=CONFIG]30873[/ATTACH]
Just saw DrP reported too
Is the section of trail down to the pond finally open?
StardusterParticipant@dbb 226125 wrote:
It will be interesting to see how they hold up. I’d expect we will start seeing dings and tire scrapes as motorists discover they don’t drive as well as they think.
Betcha a motorist complained when they hurt their car on the curb they didn’t see.
-
AuthorReplies