Bikethink vs. carthink
- This topic has 12 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
So here’s a theory that might be farfetched, but whatever.
Weekly shopping trip this morning, first to the farmer’s market and then the grocery store. Too much to buy for one trip if I took the bike. So, take the car and get it all in one trip, or take the bike and make two trips?
The bike, of course. It’s an easy decision, because two trips gives more bike time, and more time is better on a bike!
“Carthink” is all about trying to save car time: speeding, fighting traffic, trying to avoid jams, maximizing car productivity by getting as much done as possible in one trip.
“Bikethink” is different. Because bike riding is fun, and any extra time spent riding can be justified for the exercise, we look for excuses to ride more, not less! We’re looking for MORE time on the bike, not LESS time in the car. Two trips on a bike is, by definition, better than one. Twice the fun!
Similar to a conversation I had at work. I usually take a roundabout loop through Capitol Hill that adds a mile or two to my commute in order to avoid a couple bad rush hour intersections near Union Station. Colleague asked: “Doesn’t that take longer?” Answer: “Yes, and that is a good thing. Within reason, and as long as I’m moving (bikes hate being stationary), I’d much prefer a longer route if it’s more pleasant. More riding is better, not worse!” He shook his head, uncomprehending.
Congestion has socialized us to optimize NOT being stuck in the car any longer than necessary. Big source of stress and annoyance.
I like bikethink better. Since we spend a lot of time transporting ourselves places, better that it be fun.
Bike rack at the store today:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]419[/ATTACH]
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
